The Genius in All of Us traverses a similar path to
Talent is Overrated and
Outliers, but has enough differences to warrant a look. Unlike Gladwell's splendid Outliers, which is more of a journalistic investigation and less aimed at personal development, The Genius in All of Us focusses on the specific type of 'hard practice' that high acheivers perform. Unlike Talent is Overrated, Shenk's focus is less on corporate excellence and more on personal excellence.
Shenk's focus seems more personal (almost -if one can forgive the cliche- existential), and this permeates throughout his work. At one point, he even discusses the struggles he has as a writer, and he clearly puts himself through some punishment in the writing and editing process, re-drafting until he is absolutely happy. As a consequence of his own perfectionism, this book is short, with only half of it being taken up by the actual text- the last half is his notes and references. It is good to see a book in this genre with a flora of referencing; I did however, feel a little cheated when I realised this book was over halfway through (especially after buying the hardback).
Had I been aware of this before hand, I would still have bought the book, and having realised Shenk's network of referencing at the back, I would have worked through his notes concurrently, as they do provide an extra level of analysis. He is also -as far as I am aware- the only author in this genre to tackle the issue of genetics and how they relate to level of performance (he goes as far as to critique the 'monozygotic twin' studies so beloved of Pinker in
The Blank Slate). In addition, he also deals nicely with some of the many critiques leveled at Gladwell's thesis about how many hours is required to make someone 'elite'.
Finally, he focusses heavily on the successes of Michael Jordan, but Jordan's success is only part of the story- I would have liked some consideration of Jordan's brief (but disastrous) flirtation with professional Baseball. Why did Jordan's drive not translate into results? Was he too old? I'm quite sure that Shenk's thesis would not be harmed by Jordan's failure, but strengthened, after all, part of the thesis of this book is the embracing of failure.
In the end, this is a well referenced, even-toned book that adds to a growing number of well researched self-help books.