The Gap: The Science of What Separates Us from Other Animals and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
  • RRP: £19.99
  • You Save: £0.01
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 12 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
The Gap has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Like New | Details
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: SHIPS FROM USA: PLEASE ALLOW 10 to 21 BUSINESS DAYS FOR DELIVERY. LIKE NEW/UNREAD!!! Text is Clean and Unmarked! Has a small black line on edge of pages. Tracking is not available for orders shipped outside of the United States. If you would like to track your domestic order please be sure to select the Priority/Expedited Shipping option.
Trade in your item
Get a £1.58
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

The Gap Hardcover – 13 Feb 2014

3 customer reviews

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£10.49 £5.26
£19.98 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 12 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

The Gap + The Accidental Species: Misunderstandings of Human Evolution
Price For Both: £37.98

Buy the selected items together

Trade In this Item for up to £1.58
Trade in The Gap for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £1.58, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Hardcover: 352 pages
  • Publisher: Basic Books (13 Feb. 2014)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0465030149
  • ISBN-13: 978-0465030149
  • Product Dimensions: 15.6 x 3 x 23.5 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 268,963 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description


A "PUBLISHERS WEEKLY" Top 10 Fall Science Title "A rewarding, thought-provoking journey.... Mr. Suddendorf cuts an entertaining swath through a thicket of research studies on primate cognition....The author's style is not only consistently interesting and informative but at times delightfully playful.... a welcome addition to the growing literature explaining science to the intelligent layperson."--"Wall Street Journal" --The Wall Street Journal

"Beautifully written, well researched and thought provoking, "The Gap" searches for key differences between humans and the rest of the animal kingdom, and presents a balanced overview of the current status of our understanding of the mental abilities of animals. I found it fascinating and strongly recommend it to everyone who is curious as to how we have evolved to become the dominant species in the world today. Thank you, Thomas Suddendorf, for writing this book." ----Jane Goodall, PhD, DBE, Founder, The Jane Goodall Institute, and UN Messenger of Peace

"Fascinating reading... A fine example of science made accessible for general readers, combining history, personal anecdotes, clear accounts of research and a broad picture of human evolution." --Kirkus Reviews

About the Author

Thomas Suddendorf is a professor of psychology at the University of Queensland, whose research has been covered by the BBC, Discover, and the New York Times. He lives in Queensland, Australia.

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book is an absolute must-read for anybody with an interest in contemporary psychology and/or open questions concerning the complex relationship between Man and the other animals.

A few very strange reviews have been written about this book, taking some kind of moral stance and judging not the book, but our relationship to animals from some moral point of view! Thus, the book/the author get in part mediocre ratings as a sanction, in some way, for mankind’s attitude towards animals!! This is, obviously, completely besides the point (to say the least), and does little justice to a very remarkable scientific (and literary) achievement. The book is very interesting, strongly backed by indisputable scientific work and references, and a pleasure to read, as the author explains without ever lecturing, and even often manages to be quite entertaining.

This book is very 'konsequent' and essentially 'sachlich' (to use German adjectives with hardly any English equivalent), meaning it may come across, on the whole, as a bit dry. But this makes the demonstration and the contents all the more intelligible and stringent.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Mr Patrick Jones on 23 Sept. 2014
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 92 people found the following review helpful By Chris Roberts on 12 Jan. 2014
Format: Hardcover
Mankind is impossibly predictable...

It burn a ruinous blood, ever violent...

The wild kingdom is harmonious, intuitive...

The great beasts do not wage organized war...

The egret does not commit suicide...

The Alaskan Grizzly does not have murder on its mind...

The Bengal Tiger does not engage in arson...

The condor does not strafe chemical agents on its fellows...

You're not going to see a monkey on Hollywood and Dead Vine Streets...

Nodding out in the gutter, a needle in his arm...

Man destroys mindlessly...

The beasts are far, far advanced of man...

Because beasts simply live...

Chris Roberts
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 27 reviews
51 of 55 people found the following review helpful
The gap between the minds of men and critters 17 Nov. 2013
By Alan F. Sewell - Published on
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
This book seeks to answer the curious question of why human beings apparently have no close relatives on the evolutionary tree. After all, evolution is a painstaking slow process of incremental accumulation of genetic mutations that eventually differentiate the species. Most species have many close relations.

So WHY is there only one species of human beings extant, and no other species even comes close to what we’ve accomplished in the way of obtaining dominion over the Earth?

The traditional theoretical answers are:

1. (Religious) Man is a divine creation who was DESIGNED to be different from every other species.

2. There WERE until recently (a few tens of thousands of years ago) several species of hominids but homo sapiens eliminated them by:

A) Interbreeding with them.
B) Exterminating them
C) Gently outcompeting them so that over a period of hundreds of thousands of years we gradually became the dominant hominid
D) All of the above.

3. Perhaps we actually DO have closely related species (apes and orangutans) who look more different to us than they really are. An alien from another planet might consider them to be just another subspecies of hominid. Recent observations of apes in captivity and the wild have revealed cooperative behaviors all to similar to the “politicking” that goes on all the time in human societies.

These theories have been discussed so often in recent years that I was a bit reluctant to buy this book.

However after previewing it in Kindle, Author Thomas Suddendorf’s logic is so well stated and his writing is so entertainingly lucid that I could not resist purchasing the book and making time to read it at a leisurely pace so as to comprehend it fully. It turned out to be an enjoyable and informative read from cover to cover.

Suddendorf begins by pointing out the obvious --- that the “gap” between man and all other creatures is in the brain and the mind. He provides a good account of recent research that has identified the specific biological differences in the neuron structure of human brains vs. our mammalian cousins. He then explores the psychological differences between the way that human beings and the lower primates appear to think.

Suddendorf warns us not to jump to any quick conclusions about the “gap” between the thinking process in humans and animals. We barely understand how human beings cogitate (conscious vs. unconscious), so let’s not imagine that we can be certain how animals comprehend their world. With that caveat in mind he relates many experiments with the higher primates that APPEAR to show cognitive abilities in animals. He comes close to pinpointing the dimensions of the “gap” that exist between the more intelligent animals (horses, dogs, apes, and dolphins) and human beings.

The gap appears to be both smaller and larger than one may have suspected. In the social sense the gap appears small. Suddendorf points out that chimpanzees have developed highly politicized societies whereby individuals are preoccupied with their social standing. They appear able to "model the minds" of others in their group and thereby know how to advance their social standing by appeasing or deceiving them. Several individuals may cooperate together to advance their common interests, such as by conspiring to kill the dominant “alpha male" and replacing him with a new hierarchy.

Some societies of chimps act exactly like human gangs, terrorizing rivals with torture and murder who intrude on their turf. Other societies of chimps appear to be “hippies” who’d rather make love rather than war.

In their capacity to form social hierarchies the gap between these animals and us seems quite small. But in terms of abstract thinking --- the ability to theorize about how to improve on their environments through artificial constructs, the gap is large.

CONSIDER ONE OF THE MOST fundamental aspects of our human mind: we can imagine things other than what is available to the senses. We can picture past, future, and entirely fictional worlds and think about them. William James noted that it is the capacity to conceive of alternatives that allows us to question why things are the way they are. Humans ask big questions like: what are we, where do we come from, and where are we going? Most cultures have elaborate creation myths that children are told when they start raising these questions.

Questioning and finding meaning are essential to the human mind. (Why else are you reading this?) But what about animals? Do they ponder past, future, or fictional events? Do they search for the meaning of life? Can they conjure up worlds beyond what they can perceive here and now? Do they have even the most basic imagination? How could we find out?

The book accomplishes its goal of defining what the gap is between human and animal intelligence. It also provides a “101” education about the evolution of human intelligence during the past 10 million years. And it has some fun with projecting where evolution might take our intelligence in the future.

The writing style is perfect to enable a layperson to obtain a good general understanding of what’s current in science of human evolution and the SPECIFIC brain structures and cognitive differences that gives Man the dominion of the earth.
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful
The Gap: Between Two Legs and a Crotch 10 Jan. 2014
By Andrew Smart - Published on
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
There aren’t many questions bigger than: ‘What makes our minds so different to other animals? According to some pundits, more information has been produced in this century than has accrued in all the millennia before and it’s expected to go on exploding. So how do you make sense of the deluge? One way is to find people, who you trust to have the deepest, wisest, latest stuff worth weaving into your own big picture. Thomas Suddendorf brings established facts from a range of fields, such as palaeoanthropology, linguistics and genetics to his own fields of evolutionary psychology and child development to craft a powerfully persuasive argument for the evolutionary course of what he refers to as ‘The Gap’ – the mental gap between our closest relatives, the great apes, and us.

Central to his quest is the identification of the building blocks of the mind, which he broadly defines as the ability to think of things which are beyond our immediate perception. To establish the base of the gap he applies tests developed by famed child psychologist Piaget to chimpanzees, orangutans and gorillas and finds that they are able to meet the tasks of Piaget’s last object permanence task (called 6b!). ‘Like human two-year-olds, but unlike other primates, adult great apes have demonstrated that they can think about things they did not perceive.’ They pass the test of a mind by inferring a probable place for an object they can no longer perceive. Having gauged the lower limits of ‘The Gap’ he probes for the upper limits: ‘key uniquely human attributes that may have led to a profound shift in human behaviour’. He divides human behaviour into six domains: language, mental time travel, mind reading, intelligence, culture, and morality’

However, his exploration of the domains of ‘The Gap’ reveals another gap – a gap in the mental apparatus of humans that has diverged over the last eight million years or so. As the inner gap divided and widened in our ancestors, like two legs of a mental system evolving in tandem, it opened ‘The Gap’ between us and our nearest relatives. Along one leg there is an increasing complexity of scenarios which our ancestors could hold as ‘pretend perceptions’. Along the other leg there is a complimentary drive to influence the contents of the mind of others - most evidently in the evolution of language and its group phenomenon called culture. In between he stirs up a pot of intriguing quandaries…

Here are a couple of examples that stirred my thinking. ‘Great apes… have been shown to delay gratification’ and ‘for a reward forty times larger than the immediate reward option, chimpanzees may wait up to eight minutes.’ It seems that while most other animals use the past to influence the present – great apes also use the past to influence the future. So if a two year old child already has a mental mechanism similar in sophistication to an adult chimpanzee – yet has perhaps another thirty years to go, (a recent study he refers to indicates that some parts of our brains don’t complete development till mid-thirties) then have we the intelligence to unravel such an intricate development of intelligence? And, then, looking at the bigger picture, why were our ancestors so driven by nature to break completely the bonds of time and space – to imagine anything they wanted? He notes where this rapid selection has occurred in the brain: ‘For example, brain imaging studies have found that when participants are asked to recall past events and imagine future scenarios, the same areas of the brain … are involved.‘ How stable is such a recent realignment of cognitive abilities? How vulnerable is our new-fangled imagination apparatus to mass delusion and exploitation? Do we have the intelligence to untangle the truth of us?

In an example from the domain of morality Suddendorf notes that ‘evolution works only on how memory influences fitness, not for how accurately memory reflects the past per se.’ Later he quotes Darwin: ‘The highest possible stage in moral culture is when we recognise that we ought to control our thoughts.’ But Darwin was writing nearly 150 years ago, when knowledge was still mostly gained through experience and private reading. Hasn’t the nature of the source and hence the control of knowledge changed dramatically since then? Are we discussing the fitness of a morality made by individuals to a culture that is as naked as nature intended for over tens of millions of years? Or are we swept along in a ‘blue pill’ morality, our natures tailored, enculturated, deformed by institutions for the fitness of the modern state in its Darwinian struggle for political domination of this planet?

There are many other mind stretchers but the crux at the ‘crotch’ of Suddendorf’s ‘The Gap’ is: will it narrow, stay the same or widen? He goes for a wider gap – for two possible reasons – the extinction of our great ape relatives and so the gap extends to monkeys or/and we extend those legs and get to increase our intelligence. He cites the Flynn effect. But there is another prospect – ironically built on the baby like belief – out of mind, out of sight, the ‘unmentionable gap’, the forbidden thought -that humans have speciated since they began escaping Africa. At the end of this mindless gap is the final scenario - the spectre of the last man to know ‘The Gap’.

His Faustian spirit shines through his big picture (or is it meta scenario) with observations made with love, curiosity and a willingness to go wherever hard reality takes him. His research and his collaborations around the world – and his real life adventures – bring the frontier of neuroscience to the independent thinker. A few books are worth the extra time of a deep read. This is one of them. Because he takes our view of us and animals to the frontier; a frontier from where we might see far enough to change the fate of … ‘The Gap’.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Us vs. All of Them 20 Feb. 2014
By Taylor McNeil - Published on
Format: Hardcover
How special are we human beings—we homo sapiens? We take a look around at the other animals—first even recognizing that we are animals, in particular primates, is sometimes difficult—and say to ourselves that we are indeed pretty darn special, clearly many cuts above the rest of the animal kingdom. We speak, write, create art, build iPhones, and heck, are lords of all we see. On the other hand, how about other animals that seem pretty smart, like our cousins the great apes (orangutans, gorillas, and chimpanzees) and in whom we see some, well, familiar faces and traits. And aren’t dogs and cats pretty clever sometimes, not to mention some birds that have even been known to wield tool-like objects?

Thomas Suddendorf, a psychologist born in Germany and now teaching in Australia, systematically lays out the issues in his remarkable book, The Gap: The Science of What Separates Us from Other Animals. To know what separates us, we have to know what’s special about us and what makes us tick. Suddendorf takes us on a fascinating tour of what it means to be human, and then systematically looks at attempts to find traces of those same traits in other animals.

Above all what sets us physically apart are our brains. Suddendorf has a chart that shows graphically the average excess amount of brains in weight over and above what would be expected based on body size for a number of species. The one outlier? Humans. Far behind are the great apes, and several steps below them are various monkeys—just as they are steps away from us on the evolutionary tree.

Suddendorf lays out the arguments using different qualities that seem to set us apart from all other animals. As Suddendorf writes: “Consider one of the most fundamental aspects of our human mind: we can imagine things other than what is available to our senses. We can picture past, future, and entirely fictional worlds and think about them.” He notes that there is little evidence, despite attempts to produce it, that any other animals have this quality, especially by experiments using “out of sight, out of mind” as the test. Children at a young age are able to keep an object in mind after it is hidden, but other animals rarely have this ability. Mirror recognition, too, is rare, though some of the great apes recognize themselves in mirrors, though monkeys cannot.

Language is another line of demarcation. “The most fundamental feature of language is that it allows us to exchange thoughts,” he writes. There are also many different languages—more than 6,000—and types, such as sign language and Braille. Human language is breathtakingly diverse and rich; our use of metaphor is one example of the ways it can be stretched willy-nilly. Experiments teaching language to great apes have yielded some comprehension, but nothing like the complexity of human language ability. Suddendorf gives masterful explanations of these issues involving language, just as he does with all these topics—his writing is clear and cogent, and conveys complex information with ease.

Planning for the future is another of the attributes that humans seem to have a monopoly on. As Suddendorf quotes Richard Dawkins, “Long-term planning … is something utterly new on the planet, even alien. It exists only in human brains. The future is a new invention of evolution.”

Suddendorf explains research done on very young children, and compares it with similar work done with great apes like chimpanzees. Our primate cousins seem to perform at the level of about two-year-old children—but never progress beyond that. And that is Suddendorf’s main point: an odd species here and there might show some level of understanding and communication skills, but none rises beyond a low level that humans quickly surpass.

Is there more to learn about other animals’ cognitive abilities? Certainly, and Suddendorf is careful to point out repeatedly what he’s detailing is the level of knowledge we have now about other animals’ cognitive abilities. But he’s also pretty confident—and convincing—when he says there is a gap, and that the gap is growing—not because we’re getting smarter; we’re simply eliminating our near relatives through extinction.

In fact, the gap is wider than it might otherwise have been, for the simple reason that our closest relatives are now extinct: the Neanderthals, the Denisovans (another hominid group found in Siberia)—and possibly even others that have eluded our attention, but whose genetic fingerprints we may soon find. The Neanderthals and the Denisovans left Africa before our ancestors did, setting north and creating their own paths. They even mingled with us—some 1-3 percent of our genes come from Neanderthals—except for current-day Africans, who have none of the genetic mixing.

The Neanderthals became extinct some 30,000 years ago, but if they were still around, the odds are the gap between them and us would be much smaller than between us and the great apes. What led to the Neanderthals’ collapse isn’t known.

But what will lead to the extinction of gorillas—another close relative—is clear: us. Through habitat destruction and simple predation, we will destroy them. Later generations of humans will perhaps marvel that the gap between humans and monkeys—distinctly more distant cousins of ours than the great apes, with much lesser cognitive abilities—is so large. Would that we perhaps weren’t quite as smart—and thus effectively destructive—as we are.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Very informative 22 Dec. 2013
By Felipe Korzenny - Published on
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
Interesting book. Well written and documented. Perhaps a little dry, but makes important points the similarities and differences between humans and their cousins.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
A hominin weed species? 2 Jun. 2014
By J. A. Haverstick - Published on
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Just read this book. Long interest in "animals' vs "people". Philosophy perfesser, I'm afraid. I find this author's writing style absolutely engaging. Much of the argument - about recursion, etc -is getting old hat by now to the human population interested in the topic, but it is well and humorously presented here by a guy whose first language isn't even English! Also, we've got the "theory of mind" issue and what the author calls "mental time travel".Perhaps the most thought provoking remark in the book is that if we had the 20 or so Hominins now extinct existing, we'd not need to ask the question of why we're so "different". Think about the almost miraculous activity of, say, ants raising mushrooms. But in the ants' case(s) we can almost always track the intermediate steps kind of spoiling the illusion. But here we are, seemingly alone and different with no stepping stones in sight.

There's a theme here that just is part of the default thinking of almost everybody who writes or talks about the rise of humanity, if that's what you want to call it. Kudzu, house sparrows, the fungus wiping out species of amphibians as we speak, well, they're WEED SPECIES! Us, well, we're SPECIAL! Not some hominin escaped from an environment to devaste our new neighborhoods. Does "mental time travel" make us a special case as an animal? What if an ant psychologist wrote this book? Well, she couldn't write, you say. Yes, but we can't do a lot of ant things, either. There's just a lot of "religion" involved in the assumptions here. As someone who spends hours watching my honeybees behave, I think we've got hardly a clue about the mental lives of our fellow creatures. But you'll enjoy this book. It's about where we are now.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know