First of all I have to declare an interest (and a concern) here. Ben Kane and I are colleagues in the historical fiction genre, and friends to boot. He's recently reviewed my first book and been kind enough to make some positive comments - and I suppose the praise of our peers always means a lot to any professional - and I therefore approach this review in the interesting situation that if I take a positive view of 'The Forgotten Legion' it can 'only be' as an act of mutual back scratching. Indeed I thought long and hard before setting finger to keyboard at all on the subject, but decided that not to comment on Ben's debut novel would just be counter productive, given the way I reacted to his work. So...
Ben often says that 'The Forgotten Legion' would be a better book were he to write it now, and think we can all say the same about our early work. We mature as writers, learn what works best and become more skilled at plot and characterisation (you can either write dialogue or you can't, and no amount of literary study will change that in my opinion). So if Ben were to re-write TFL he might produce a more 'polished' work, but might also run the risk of losing the energy that I found in the book, that sheer sense of 'what if...' that has a fan of alternate history like me stroking his chin and thinking.
Ben holds a sizeable audience in the palm of his hand, and it's easy to see why. The risk with historical fiction is that we tend to know more or less what's coming. We know that Crassus makes a right old mess of his war with the Parthians and ends up with a gut full of molten gold, but Ben, like all really good historical fiction writers, manages to get the reader, even those with a good idea of what's coming, to read on regardless, fascinated by the detail he provides and hooked by the plot elements woven around the bare details that most of us know. The plot provokes the reader to read on, and find out what's going to happen to the captives once the dreadful defeat at Carrhae has played out, whether Romulus and Fabiola really are Caesar's illigitimate children from a rape years before, and how this will all come together in future volumes. Alongside the plot lines, Ben's characterisation crafts real people, scarred by experience and circumstance and with strengths to be exploited and weaknesses to be coped with, characters the reader will happily follow along the story's arc with a genuine sense of concern for their well being.
Lastly, and critically for me, Ben really does his research, and when he's going off piste in terms of what we know as historical fact he tells the reader so in order to be clear as to what's based on the record and what isn't. He clearly has a long and successful career in front of him, and I can only see his work going from strength to strength as his powers develop. Well done Mr Kane, and thanks for making it easy for me to solve my dilemma by providing me with so much entertainment.
Oh yes, and silk to 'arrow proof' shields, eh Ben? *quietly tucks the fact away for future use...*