One of the most fascinating and enduring quests is the ongoing search for the historical Jesus. The best accounts we have of this charismatic figure is intertwined with Gospel theology. There have been no lack of books on the subject for over one hundred years of publishing. What distinguishes this latest is the amazing career and the integrity of its author. For me, it is a wet dream to have been excavating for over thirty years the paths, cities, caves etc of the Holy Land. Shimon Gibson has done just that, and his contribution is the archaeological survey rather than the manipulation of old texts and new ideas.
Unfortunately there is a lot of both which dilutes the author's unique insight, but this book is probably the most honest and down to earth (pun intended) we can hope for. Most other academics are more concerned to display their wisdom and talk among themselves. Gibson is far too modest and decent for that. The most valuable parts of the book are the insights into the Israel Antiquities Authority for whom he worked over most of his career.
Shimon Gibson was in the team who surveyed in April 1980 the Talpiot "Jesus" tomb, a matter clearly central to the book's theme. In my view the evidence of a cover-up is pretty obvious and it is sad that this book points readers in the direction of disbelief as imposed by IAA. Why does Gibson state on p. 128, "Recently, the tomb of Jesus was identified in a cave at Talpiot ..." then an epilogue (p. 175) is devoted to the party line to discredit the theory? Gibson reproduces his drawings with certain elements one must state were deliberately omitted in the brief IAA report which, incidentally, was delayed until its 1996 review?
More disturbing is the blame attributed to his co-worker, the late Joseph Gath, who "left behind only sparse and incomplete notes about the results of his excavation." Well, what was his boss doing in 1980? Gibson also contradicts the statement of Gath's widow that the latter knew that Israel had found the tomb of Jesus and as an exile of Poland was terrified and silenced by the prospect of anti-Semitism. I'm sure it is no part of the conspiracy, but it is curious that conflicting dates of his death are published (I'm assuming that, like Jesus, he only died once).
If only the dead could talk ... but as Gibson implies, that's the archaeologist's job. And this is the armchair student's most accessible view of the arena. For further study, the Bibliography includes some elusive but reliable sources. Unlike so many books in this discredited genre, "The Final Days of Jesus" deserves to be a best-seller.