This book contains an excellent, clear and well written overview of Andrei Tarkovsky's films and style as a director. It is very detailed and full of information, all you need to get a guide to these "difficult" films. I also like that even while the authors admire Tarkovsky as a great director, they don't hesitate to point out less flattering sides and flaws in his films.
The first part gives some interesting details about the Soviet film industry in the 1960s and 70s, when Tarkovsky produced his first five major films: Ivan's Childhood, Andrei Rublev, Solaris, Mirror and Stalker. It also nuances the storys about how the Soviet system worked against Tarkovsky. Of course, the film bureaucracy was hard to deal with and made several crazy demands that could have ruined T:s films. But then again: he actually managed to make five films and get them through the socialist-realist censorship. For example: all 30 demands for cuts and so on on Solaris were somehow avoided. Maybe this says something about Tarkovskys status as a director, his first film (Ivan's Childhood) was an immediate international success. Also, there were other directors shose careers were halted by the system when they were only allowed to make one film.
The first part also contains biographical information and discussions on Tarkovsky's working method and aesthetics. Tarkovsky wanted films to be a "poetic" art form, and an art that captured "time", like a sculpture of time. Here we can think about the long takes in his films, they got longer over the years and in The Sacrifice, his last film, the opening take is over 9 minutes.
The second part is an overview of his seven films, one chapter for each. I find the analyses very clear and interesting. One thing I find fascinating is the ambiguity about what is real and what is dream or fantasy. Does the zone in Stalker really exist? Is Hari in Solaris human? What in Nostalghia is dream and what is reality? And does the protagonist in The Sacrifice delude himself, or is he more clear than the others? And so on. This is one aspect that makes the films so interesting and open to different interpretations. Also, the authors discuss the use of different themes lika fire, rain, milk, horses and so on. They suggest they have no fixed symbolic meaning, but should be seen as poetic themes that recur through the films: the levitation scene in Solaris has counterparts in Mirror and Sacrifice, the hotel room in Nostalghia looks similar to the room where Stalker lives, the "holy fool" appears as both Stalker and Domenico and Alexander, the close ups of medieval paintings, the vegetation under water, the rain and so on... This is why the book is called "A Visual Fugue".
The third part deepens the analysis of the themes of Tarkovskys films.
All in all I can really recommend this book to anyone who, like me, want an enlightening and clear introduction.
Also, the authors (Vida Johnson and Graham Petrie) comments on the Criterion DVD of Solaris (my favourite Tarkovsky film). This commentary is recommended listening to (and the DVD is splendid).