Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 70% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
30
4.5 out of 5 stars
Format: Kindle Edition|Change
Price:£5.76
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

TOP 1000 REVIEWERon 25 August 2013
This is, to steal a line from elsewhere, a book of two halves. There is the poem itself, running to no more than a few hundred lines, and comprising a very slim section of the book. Secondly there is an "Introduction" and (for want of a better phrase) and "After" section written by Christopher Tolkien.

The poem itself, is interesting enough, and in fact begs to be read aloud. It adds another string to the already tightly woven threat of things Arthurian, and is of course interesting because of the style in which it was written - Alliterative Verse.

The second section contains the microanalysis of JRRT's ideas, motifs and motivations in writing the poem. This reads like the similar sections in the posthumous publications - ie serious, meticulous and soporific for all but the most dedicated of fans.

So, I think the poem itself is worthwhile, but at this price it may be better to wait for the paperback version. If the second section - the analysis - appeals to you, then this is the version to purchase.
0Comment| 16 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 30 May 2013
"The Fall of Arthur" is J.R.R. Tolkien's unfinished contribution to the already considerable body of literature about the legendary British king. Composed as it is in imitation of Old English 'alliterative' verse, an often-used term Tolkien himself had reservations about, it is quite a challenge to read. At his best, Tolkien was capable of producing some truly great poetry, and he expended much thought and labour on "The Fall of Arthur", having, as his son describes in the Foreword, an "exact and perfectionist concern to find, in an intricate and subtle narrative, fitting expression within the patterns and rhythm and alliteration of the Old English verse-form." The result, while happily composed in modern English, is language so charged with meaning (and language charged with meaning is as good a definition of poetry as I can come up with) that I was only able to read it in short increments to have any hope of being able to take it in. While it may at first glance be of negligible appeal to any but Tolkien completists and those indiscriminately enamoured of Old English poetry, "The Fall of Arthur" may be found to have much to recommend it by those who make the effort to actually read it. Particularly striking in what is after all an archaizing work, and highly unusual in any work by Tolkien, is the treatment of the traitor Mordred's tormenting sexual desire for Queen Guinevere, as is his characterization of the famous queen herself, in very modern terms, as a woman of flesh and blood with her own needs, hopes and desires, caught between, and on unequal footing with, three men of power (Arthur, Mordred and Lancelot) in a story that can only end badly no matter what the outcome. Consider for example how Tolkien describes her during her flight from Camelot as a "hind hardly from hiding driven/her foe had fled, fear-bewildered,/cowed and hunted, once queen of herds/for whom harts majestic in horned combat/had fought fiercely"; yet despite her status as an unwilling trophy in a world (whether historical or legendary) ruled by men, she trusts to her own resolute nature:

Guinevere the fair,
not Mordred only, should master chance
and the tides of time turn to her purpose.

In its final, i.e. posthumously edited and published, form (editor Christopher Tolkien wryly comments that "no manuscript of my father's could be regarded as 'final' until it had safely left his hands") "The Fall of Arthur" is 40 pages (or 954 lines) long. The remaining 176 pages of editorial apparatus can appeal only to Tolkien completists and those indiscriminately enamoured of all things Arthurian, and I must confess that I was unable to read it all, though the inclusion of C.S. Lewis's scathing criticism of Geoffrey of Monmouth's "History of the Kings of Britain" was an incisive gem well worth persevering for. Be all that as it may, I'll end this attempt at a review by letting the poem speak for itself:

never and nowhere knights more puissant,
nobler chivalry of renown fairer,
mightier manhood under moon or sun
shall be gathered again till graves open.
Here free unfaded is the flower of time
that men shall remember through the mist of years
as a golden summer in the grey winter.
0Comment| 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
JRR Tolkien had a passion for ancient myths and legends. But for some reason, he never wrote much about the stories of King Arthur.

That isn't to say he didn't write anything about the Once and Future King. In the 1930s, he wrote "The Fall of Arthur," an epic poem that he abandoned in favor of his more famous Middle-Earth books. This is not the genteel, courtly Arthur of Thomas Malory -- this is a rough, ancient-feeling poem that follows the rhythm and flow of Anglo-Saxon poetry.

"Arthur eastward in arms purposed/his war to wage on the wild marches,/over seas sailing to Saxon lands,/from the Roman realm ruin defending..." The malevolent Mordred convinces Arthur and Gawain to set out to war, during which he will take care of Arthur's kingdom. The two battle their foes to the east, and are wildly successful...

... until "from the West came word, winged and urgent,/of war assailing the walls of Britain." Mordred has treacherously turned against Arthur, and is even pursuing his beautiful queen Guinever, who flees the castle to avoid him. So Arthur heads back home to reclaim his throne, even as the exiled Sir Lancelot is drawn back to help the man he wronged.

Sadly, the poem was never finished, and it ends after a rousing little speech by Gawain. So to pad out the book, Christopher Tolkien wrote a multi-part essay about the poem and its depiction of Arthur -- the Saxon overtones, the presence of Rome and other countries, Tolkien's use of language, and comparisons to other works of medieval Arthuriana.

He also expounds on its connection to Tolkien's "Silmarillion" (aka the Elf Bible), the various notes that Tolkien left behind that indicate his intentions for the remainder of the poem, and the evolution of the poem, based on Tolkien's multiple drafts. These parts are not particularly interesting except from a scholarly standpoint -- the real draw is the poem itself.

Though Tolkien wrote "The Fall of Arthur," it feels as though he uncovered a forgotten piece of parchment and simply translated the story. This is a very Anglo-Saxon Arthur, with none of the polished medieval flavor that most stories have -- he's depicted as an Invasion-era Briton who bravely fights back against the eastern invaders.

And anyone who has studied "Beowulf" will recognize the way this was written -- short lines, strong alliteration, caesura (mid-line pauses) and kennings (two words connected to form another one: "the wind-wreckage in the wide heavens"). The entire poem has a strong oral flavor, with the swaying rhythms of old Saxon poetry.

And Tolkien's use of language is as exquisite as ever ("Grey her eyes were as a glittering sea;/glass-clear and chill"), evoking feelings of a wild but civilized world, of banners with ravens, ships ablaze on the sea and castles overlooking the sea.

"The Fall of Arthur" is not a work for the casual Tolkien reader -- instead, it's a beautiful, sadly incomplete epic poem that makes you wish he had been immortal, so he could have one day completed it.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 8 August 2013
I'm not accustomed to reading alliterative verse. So I can't really speak as to how well Tolkien pulled off that particular aspect of the writing.

However I can say that the story itself was engrossing and I found that the act of reading it in alliterative verse format gave it a certain quality of novelty which I found very appealing.

The only problem, which I knew going into it as the publisher makes no secret of the fact, is that the story is too short as Tolkien (like so many other works) never completed it before he died.

In my opinion a brilliant addition to any collection of Tolkien's work, or indeed of medieval literature.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 21 September 2013
If you love your Arthurian Legends, you are going to love this book. The poetry is fully developed in its intricate combination of rhymes and alliterations. The complementary comments bring clarity to the original text and the different versions that never saw the light before.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 16 May 2016
Beautiful book. Lovely slipcase edition. I have the full collection of these and I'm never disappointed.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 21 October 2014
I'm only sorry that Tolkien did not finish this, but what there is of the story is gripping. Especially fine are Guenever tricking the treacherous Mordred, Lancelot pondering indecisively whether to return to England, Gawain establishing a beachhead as Arthur returns from the continent to deal with Mordred's uprising. Tolkien had a gift for composing alliterative verse. Christopher Tolkien's introduction and commentary provide valuable background information.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 12 June 2013
I've always been a voracious reader, and my drug of choice is fantasy. Like many people, Lord of the Rings was my gateway drug.

After yearly re-reads and losing myself in the many supplementary works of Tolkien, I've since moved on to other fantasy worlds, but LOTR will always remain my first love. So it should come as no surprise that, some time last week, I lost my mind when someone posted a link to this release. I'd had no idea it was in the offing, and sped on over here where I threw away £9 for instant delivery to my Kindle.

I feel a little swindled, as it turns out that the long abandoned, unfinished and previously unreleased work only took up about 30% of the book, with the rest being essays and notes by Christopher designed to shine a little light on and place the poem in context (and pad the book enough to justify the price).

Apparently an alliterative Old English poem, I wouldn't know one of those if it walked up and alliterated in my face, but I can say it was somewhat effective (when I understood it) - Arthur seems to be battling some desolate, wind-driven landscape in a foreign campaign while Guinevere(who is given short shrift for being such a tempting slut) is menaced by Mordred, who is trying to take over Arthur's kingdom, and Lancelot sulks across the water, waiting for a summons from King or Queen that never comes. If the poem had been finished I imagine it would have made for a good telling of the back-end of the Arthur legend. But it's not finished, and so didn't really do much else for me.

As for Christopher's contributions, they were helpful when it came to looking at the poem in the context of the Arthurian tradition, and how Avalon and Tol Eressea has certain similarities, but when it came to the evolution of the poem it nearly sent me to sleep.

Oh well, one to learn from then....and I'll head to the library for any future releases from the Tolkien estate.
0Comment| 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 31 December 2013
Haven't actually read this yet so can't comment on the actual story. I bought it more because i have many of the other de luxe editions by Harper Collins and didn't wan't to be missing one. Picked this up for a great price on Amazon compared to the high street. The quality is similar to the other de luxe editions, which I'm guessing you already own if you are considering on buying this edition.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 15 January 2014
Like Tolkien's other books, have friends and historians who write on the subject too therefore I was quite interested in the comparison.
Would have like book in better condition though, but still perfectly readable.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.