This is an interesting book. Harvard educated Thomas Cleary, through this book, combines the teachings of Confucius as found in the Analects (Lunyu), with that of the commentaries found in the ancient Chinese Book of Changes (I Ching-Yijing), that Cleary believes are written by Confucius himself. This is based upon the traditional belief that either Confucius, his descendents or his students (and their descendents), wrote, edited or re-organised the commentary chapters known in the Book of Changes as the 'Ten Wings'. These ten chapters effectively transformed a Bronze Age manual of divination, into a Confucius 'Classic' that presents a philosophy that seeks to define the concept of 'change', and how change might be managed and controlled.
The key to Cleary's thinking in this instance, might be gleamed from the fact that he mentions E Bruce Brooks in his Acknowledgements. Brooks taught Cleary whilst he was a student at Harvard University, but more to the point, Brooks, along with his wife 'E Taeko', together authored a book entitled 'The Original Analects', within which they present their research suggesting the the received Analects and its order of aphorisms, was arranged differently at its inception.
In this book, Cleary presents the 64 hexagrams of the Book of Changes. With each hexagram is a simple, short paragraph of wisdom, attributed to Confucius himself. These paragraphs vary from one to four lines of writing, with the average length being two lines. These sayings are taken from chapter three and four of the Ten Wings associated with the Book of Changes - the so-called 'Xiang Zhuan', or 'Symbolism Treatise'. Readers may be more familiar with Richard Wilhelm's rendering of 'xiang' as 'image'. These short statements are always two sentences long in the original Chinese and describe two distinct attributes:
1) The first line describes the symbolism (or 'imagery') of the constituent trigrams that comprise the individual hexagram.
2) The second line advises upon what a king or 'superior person' (junzi) would do, so that their behaviour is 'coorect'.
Cleary chooses to ignore the first line of each xiang, and instead focuses upon the wisdom contained solely in the second lines. Ineffect, Cleary is using only half of each Xiang Zhuan statement, and attributing its construction to the great sage Confucius. This serves Cleary's greater purpose of linking the Analects directly to the Book of Change. The authorship of the Xiang Zhuan is disputed however, even amongst traditional scholars. Some do accept that Confucius wrote the Xiang Zhuan, whilst others assert the it was infact the Duke of Zhou. Richard Wilhelm suggests, in his notes regarding his translation of the I Ching, that the philosophy of the Xiang Zhuan is directly linked to that found in the 'Great Learning' (Daxue), which is one of the 'Four Books' of Confucianism. However, what is interesting is the fact that with each hexagram and its symbol statement, Cleary carefully selects passages from the received Analects and arranges them around each hexagarm. Each hexagram has around three or four aphorisms from the received Analects, attached to it by Cleary. What Cleary achieves with this book is a re-arranging of the Analects itself, into what he considers to be a more logical presentation for a Western audience. Appreciation is of course subjective, and it is the reader who must decide the validity of such efforts. As both texts - the Analects and the I Ching - are fairly obscure in their respective, traditional formats, it does seem a rather odd undertaking to use one Classic text to clarify the other, when both are, in the process, altered beyond recognition. The book has merit however, and is certainly useful to the spiritual seeker and scholar alike.