The End of Men: And the Rise of Women and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more

Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Start reading The End of Men: And the Rise of Women on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The End of Men: And the Rise of Women [Paperback]

Hanna Rosin
2.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
RRP: 12.99
Price: 11.96 & FREE Delivery in the UK. Details
You Save: 1.03 (8%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
Only 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition 4.68  
Hardcover --  
Paperback 6.99  
Paperback, 11 Oct 2012 11.96  
MP3 CD, Audiobook --  

Book Description

11 Oct 2012

What Betty Friedan, Simone de Beauvoir, Susan Faludi and Naomi Wolf did for feminism, senior editor of The Atlantic Hanna Rosin does for a new generation of women: an explosive new argument for why women are winning the battle of the sexes and why men are no longer top dog.

Women are no longer catching up with men. By almost every measure, they are out performing them.

We are at a turning point in history. In 2010, for the first time, the balance of the British workforce tipped towards women, who now hold around half of the nation's jobs. In the US, meanwhile, for every two men that receive a BA, three women will achieve the same. Not only do women dominate colleges and professional schools on every continent except Africa, young single women earn more than men in the US, and more than a third of mothers in the UK and the US are their family's main breadwinner.

The tides have turned. The 'age of testosterone' is decisively over. At almost every level of society women are proving themselves far more adaptable and suited to a job market that rewards people skills and intelligence, and a world that has a dramatically diminishing need for traditional male muscle.

In this landmark, once-in-a-generation book, Hanna Rosin reveals how this new world order came to be and its great implications for marriage, sex, children, work, families and society. Unhampered by old assumptions and ideologies and drawing on examples from across the globe, The End of Men helps us see how both men and women can - and must - adapt for a radically new era.

'[Its strength] lies in the nuanced portraits Rosin draws of people trying to grapple with new currents of power, to assimilate political and economic change in their living rooms and trailers' FT Weekend

'In this bold and inspired dispatch, Rosin upends the common platitudes of contemporary sexual politics with a deeply reported meditation from the unexpected frontiers of our rapidly changing culture' Katie Roiphe, author of The Morning After and Uncommon Arrangements

'The End of Men describes a new paradigm that can, finally, take us beyond 'winners' and 'losers' in an endless 'gender war.' What a relief! Ultimately, Rosin's vision is both hope-filled and creative, allowing both sexes to become far more authentic: as workers, partners, parents...and people' Peggy Orenstein, author of Cinderella Ate My Daughter and Schoolgirls

Hanna Rosin is a senior editor at The Atlantic magazine and a founder and co-editor of DoubleX, Slate's women's section. She has written for the New Yorker, The New York Times, GQ, and The New Republic, and for a number of years covered politics and religion for the Washington Post. In 2009 she was nominated for a National Magazine Award, and in 2010 she won one. She is the author of a previous book, God's Harvard: A Christian College on a Mission to Save America. Rosin lives in Washington, DC, with her husband, Slate editor David Plotz, and their three children.

Frequently Bought Together

The End of Men: And the Rise of Women + The XX Factor: How Working Women are Creating a New Society + The Athena Doctrine: How Women (and the Men Who Think Like Them) Will Rule the Future
Price For All Three: 36.06

Buy the selected items together

Product details

  • Paperback: 320 pages
  • Publisher: Viking (11 Oct 2012)
  • Language: Unknown
  • ISBN-10: 0670922641
  • ISBN-13: 978-0670922642
  • Product Dimensions: 21.2 x 15.4 x 2.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 2.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 268,198 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description


Praise for "The End of Men""[Rosin] covers an impressive amount of ground about women...A great starting point for readers interested in exploring the intersecting issues of gender, family and employment." - "Kirkus " "In this bold and inspired dispatch, Rosin upends the common platitudes of contemporary sexual politics with a deeply reported meditation from the unexpected frontiers of our rapidly changing culture." --Katie Roiphe, author of "The Morning After" and "Uncommon Arrangements"""The End of Men" describes a new paradigm that can, finally, take us beyond 'winners' and 'losers' in an endless 'gender war.' What a relief! Ultimately, Rosin's vision is both hope-filled and creative, allowing both sexes to become far more authentic: as workers, partners, parents...and people."--Peggy Orenstein, author of "Cinderella Ate My Daughter" and "Schoolgirls"Praise for Hanna Rosin's "God's Harvard " ""God's Harvard: A Christian College on a Mission to Save America", is a rare accomplishment for many reasons - perhaps most of all because Rosin is a journalist who not only reports but also observes deeply." ---"San Francisco Chronicle " "A superb work of extended reportage." -- "Chicago Sun-Times " "Nuanced and highly readable." -- "The Washington Post "

About the Author

Hanna Rosin is a senior editor at "The Atlantic "and a founder of DoubleX, "Slate's" women's section. She has written for "The New Yorker," "The New York Times," "GQ," "The New Republic," and "The Washington Post," and is the recipient of a 2010 National Magazine Award. Rosin lives in Washington, D.C., with her husband and three children.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

2.2 out of 5 stars
2.2 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
18 of 19 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Well heck! 20 Aug 2013
By Fute
Format:Kindle Edition
My wife left this book on the bedroom table when she went out to work this morning. Attracted by the pretty colours on the cover and having nothing else to do all day I eventually worked out which way round it went and stretched out on the couch in my underpants for a read. A couple of times I nearly lost interest but the print was nice and big and there were loads of references to TV shows that I used to watch back before my wife hid the remote so in the end I stuck with it, rising only a couple of times to grab a beer or urinate out the door of the trailer.

From what I could gather Ms Rosin seems to think that we men have in some way lost our 'maleness' - that being the ability to make more money, get higher grades and generally be better human beings then our womenfolk - and at times I found myself agreeing with her, and then hating myself for doing so. And then hating myself for hating myself for agreeing with her. And then just getting all plain confused.

She does have a point though. Since feminism came along we've let ourselves go a bit, us men. Reckon we held that door open a little too long and now we're stuck out in the rain being laughed at. But hey ho - that didn't bother me none as I stretched out on my couch smoking and reading and scratching my what-nots. You ladies wanted empowerment - enjoy!

Back to the book. It seems to comprise of Ms Rosin hanging around with a load of really busy women with waster husbands who lead her to the easy conclusion that we're all total dweebs.
Read more ›
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
7 of 9 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Linkjacking enters the Gender Agenda 4 April 2013
By style83
This has to be one of the most-discussed books on the question of gender in, well, the history of the gender debate. I used 'linkjacking' in the review title because a dramatic title such as this could never fail to fly off the shelves and gain hits online. The book itself suffers from three main flaws:

1) The statistical data is selective at best and flawed at worst. Here is a breakdown of the statistics used in the book:


2) Since publication, one of the stay-at-home dads involved in the book has complained of being misrepresented in the book. His story makes for interesting reading:


3) On another level, one must feel pity for Rosin's son for the way she has publicly cast gloom over his life chances. The stereotyping which emanates from the book has had some British commentators frothing.

Needless to say, Rosin will make a shedload of cash from this and see this as proof of her case. Meanwhile, in the Declining West, both women and men will see their economic power diminish. Now that is something which will, in her words, cause 'a ripple', and which both genders will have to adapt to.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
22 of 29 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars A most frustrating book. 15 Nov 2012
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
The title of this book is misleading. The author in no way proves her thesis that the end of men is anywhere near. She does show that some men have difficulty adapting to the 21st century. The whole premise is just wrong.

On the back cover of the book it is stated that 50% of those in jobs in the UK are women. So what? Over 50% of the population are women. It also states that women dominate professional schools on every continent except Africa. While women may be the majority of students in faculties such as law and medicine in some developed countries, they are in a tiny minority when it comes to professors and those who are in the management of education and in control of the finance which is allocated to education. She doesn't mention at all the number of women who are denied education completely in some parts of the world. She also doesn't mention the fact that only 14% seats on the boards of European companies which are quoted on the stock markets are occupied by women. Anybody who doubts the dominance of men on the world stage should have a look at the photographs of the get-togethers of the countries of the United Nations.Count the women leaders.

I think the problem with this book is that the author concentrates on a small set of people in a certain socio-economic position, and ignores the plight of poor women, single parents and those on welfare. Even those women she writes about in relation to their so-called sexual liberation have adopted stereo-typical male standards of behaviour in their work and in their love lives, and are not particularly fulfilled in either.

I could go on, but will finish with the observation that if you wish to read an academic book which is based on a wide sample of different societies, and which give a comprehensive view on gender today, this is not the book.
Was this review helpful to you?
3 of 5 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Important, though not completely convincing. 6 Oct 2013
By Simon
Format:Kindle Edition
Some people will hate this book. Consider one of the reviewers here at Amazon. Self-proclaimed "British Expert" Kevin Smith had this to say:

"This book is telling actually just 2 clear things, underlined and repeated over and over again:

EVERYTHING that a women does is RIGHT. No matter what.

EVERYTHING that a masculine man does is WRONG and he is GUILTY for being born a man.

Things are simple, without any other shades of grey, for her"

The reviewer continues to furnish us with some colourful examples to illustrate his case. Unfortunately, none of them has anything whatsoever to do with the book he's reviewing. Bit of a missed opportunity there. Still, it's not as though Mr. Smith ever claimed to be a "book review" expert, so perhaps we shouldn't judge him too harshly.

So why all the anger and the one-star ratings? Is the book really as bad as all that? I suspect that much of the problem stems from the bombastic assertions on the back cover of the book. It's there that we're told that "by almost every measure, [women] are outperforming [men]". If the book stands or falls by this claim then I would have to concur with the other reviewers. It's true - despite providing us with an abundance of interesting and unexpected facts and arguments- Rosin nonetheless fails to make a watertight case for the bold conclusion promised by the back cover (this failure becomes most apparent when the author dedicates a later chapter to dealing with the difficulties many women have with getting fair pay and promotions - which rather undermines her case.)

Might there be more to a book than just one argument though..? Can't we find value in the many details, statistics and anecdotes that the author presents us with (even if they are partial)..?
Read more ›
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 3.5 out of 5 stars  165 reviews
127 of 134 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars A Believable Premise, an Overhyped Book 17 Sep 2012
By Nancy Finn - Published on
Format:Hardcover|Verified Purchase
The End of Men boils down to a handful of really significant statistics. Young women hold a 3 to 2 advantage in bachelor's degrees, are outearning men in their twenties, and are beginning to crowd men out of nearly all the major professions. Exactly what this might portend is appropriate to an Atlantic magazine article, which served as the basis for this book, but does not suffice in Rosin's hands to make a thoroughly engaging book. Instead, she creates a dichotomous narrative structure emphasizing Plastic Woman, who is flexible and adaptable to the new economy, and Cardboard Man who manifestly is neither. The examples and interview subjects that she selects never stray outside this arc. The men are universally either sniveling Greenberg-like characters, when not represented as merely stupid and lazy, while the women are described in the most gushing diction as literally, "Katniss-like." The book is riven with pop culture and literary references apparently meant to support the thesis, but Rosin makes only the most half-hearted attempt to get behind what accounts for this role reversal. She simply appears to believe women are by nature innately suited to the service economy, while troglodytic men are not. Furthermore, despite taking a few jabs at class inequality, she positively swoons over the rich and powerful. Her portrayal of most working class people, male and female, smacks of smug condescencion.

Her forecasting models for what this dangerous economic imbalance might entail do not seem in any way systematic. Rather, they are derived from anecdotes, which of course she selects. She claims to be apoltical, merely a faithful chronicler of the "the world as it is," producing a work to transcend the gender wars, a conceit into which many reviewers seem have invested. In its language choice, illustrative examples, and chosen quotations, however, it is a work of considerable misandry. The End of Men looks forward not just to an age in which male supremacy will end; it glories in their approaching humiliation as incompetent, unbending males founder in the new economy while infinitely adaptable women flourish. She never sees fit to examine why boys might be failing, except when, in a remarkably distasteful vignette, she holds up her own son's shortcomings relative to her daughter; she never tires, however, of explaining how women's supposed inherent qualities are bolstering their success. She may well have accurately identified an important social trend, but rather than produce thoughtful social analysis, she has contented herself with a venomous jibe.
439 of 490 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars The End of Journalism 21 Sep 2012
By Tyro - Published on
The theme of male obsolescence is tiresome, to say the least. It also has a curious quality of seeming fresh no matter how many times, and in how many ways, it is repeated. I remember back in 1999 seeing a "forum" in Harpers called "Who Needs Men?" At the time I thought, Wow - they're still recycling that same article? Almost 15 years later, the same idea is repeated with each month's salvo of junk-nonfiction - and no sign of slowing down.

Some reviewers will no doubt complain that you can't talk this way about women. They're right, but no one cares about the double standard. Similarly, a few will be offended by her snide tone on the subject of men. What, were they born yesterday - it's just the normal tone everyone takes. It's not "misandry" that makes this book bad. It's not the perky, informal writing style. I wasn't expecting her to write like Orwell or Roth. It's bad because the writer doesn't know much about this or any other subject.

To be fair, or fairer, I did learn two things from this book. Firstly, readers love to hear their group praised and never tire of such praise. Secondly, when women are perceived to be failing, people blame it on environmental factors or prejudice. When men come up short, it is blamed on men's inherent shortcomings. Why are there so few female chess grandmasters? Well, little girls aren't encouraged to play chess. Why are there so few men in PR? Well, women have better communication skills. See? It makes perfect sense.

But I can't say the same about this book. Rosin bases most of her theory on the recession. It is a "man-cession" due to men's inherent inability to adapt. (By the way, the story of the human race is one of adaptation, is it not? Economic and otherwise. Men played a small but significant role in this history.) "Cognitive research" shows this (cognitive research about sex differences shows some of the darndest things - see reviews of Louann Brizendine and other junk-science-on-gender authors: also Leonard Sax). But never mind that.

1. "Women in poor parts of India are learning English faster than men." Good God, no. As an Indian I know that knowledge of English is a matter of formal education, pure and simple. But India, according to the government census, has one of the lowest rates of female literacy in the developing world. While the gender gap is decreasing, according the US Department of Commerce, "there continues to be a large gap" in literacy rates favoring men. This is worst among the poor: "in poorer states, the rate of literacy gap has been growing." (You can easily find this on the US census site.)

2. "In the past, men derived their advantage largely from their size and strength..." Seriously? This weary cliche sounds convincing to people who've never thought about the subject. Newton, Mozart, Fischer, and Einstein were not big, strong men.

3. "Women own more than 40 percent of private businesses in China.." I don't know if Rosin reads Foreign Affairs (seems doubtful), but she should know this is ridiculous. Who cares when you don't cite your sources? The sky's the limit! Anyway, China has a woman shortage, so such economic strides on the part of women would be quite remarkable were they true. As it is, Chinese women are doing better than average, with ownership of 8.7% of private businesses. You can find this statistic almost anywhere (try BBC sites or, really, anywhere).

4. The ever-flexible Ms. Rosin, who must do Pilates at Lucille Roberts, makes much of the journalist's favorite statistic: "young women in urban areas - 22-30 year olds - are doing better than young men." Let's do what journalists (used to) do, and look closer. According to US Department of Labor statistics, women's median full-time earnings as a percentage of men's in the first quarter of 2012 for the ages of 20-24 are 88%; for the next age group, 25-34, 91%. Pretty good, right? This means younger women earn about 88% of men's median earnings (MEDIAN earnings: this doesn't mean they're paid less for the same job.)

5. This is where the admirably adaptable Rosin misstates one of the most common factoids around. It's not "young women" who are doing better than their male counterparts - it's "full-time, non-working, childfree women in urban areas." This shouldn't be generalized to "young women," as Rosin does. She extols the virtues of young women like an apparatchik writing a HUD-funded "Girl Power" pamphlet. So, what of these young marvels, so well-adapted to "hook up culture" (with which the anecdote-happy Rosin seems weirdly obsessed)? Most of the difference between the never-married, urban denizens is among Hispanics. 23.7% of this group (urban, unmarried, etc.) are Hispanic men; 15.9% are Latinas, wise or otherwise. And within this group, the median earnings for men (2010 ACS statistics) are $24,000; for women, $25,000. The net advantage among young unmarried female city folk is $1,000, accounted for by the higher incomes of Hispanic women. (Among blacks, men have a slight advantage; among non-Hispanic whites, the sexes are more or less equal.) We should be talking about why Latins earn so little, male or female, but that doesn't sell books or provide fodder for David Brooks editorials.

6. Liza Mundy, Rosin's partner in puerility, makes much of the "women wear the pants" idea so common in our times. But in US marriages only 28% of women earn more than their husbands (US Census). For working women, it's more like 38%. This is misleading, though, because male-centered industries (like construction) are often seasonal (more profitable at certain times of year), and are more subject to ups and downs than female-centered industries like education or health care.

7. These female-centered industries are often subsidized by the government. I come from Washington DC, and I can tell you there is no "he-cession" or "she-cession" there. Why? Because they're papering the walls of the Kennedy Center with all that currency they keep printing or borrowing from the Chinese Politburo. The stimulus may have been a rip-roaring success that prevented a depression, as the president says, but it didn't do much for old school manufacturing jobs. Despite what you've heard, these industries (you know, the ones that make cement or ball bearings) are still a big part of the US economy. Originally Mr. Obama was going to toss a lot of money their way, but lobby groups (such as NOW) complained, calling it a "burly man" bailout. (You can find this in Christina Sommers' essay "No Country for Burly Men.") So - here's my point - much of female economic success is subsidized by tax dollars. Health care can't fail, not because it's too big, but because, like a skinny kid with a smart mouth, it's got a big friend for protection.

8. The language used by NOW - "a burly man bailout" - shows the kind of attitude that gets Hanna rosining up her bow and playing a scratchy tune. Her book drips with this kind of sitcom contempt for men, without even sparing her own son. Maybe she would have rather had another daughter; she gleefully recounts an anecdote of a doctor specializing in sex selection who believes that couples are requesting girls these days. "In the '90s, when Ericsson looked into the numbers for the two dozen or so clinics that use his process, he discovered, to his surprise, that couples were requesting more girls than boys, a gap that has persisted, even though Ericsson advertises the method as more effective for producing boys." The doctor Rosin apparently interviewed hardly invented prenatal sex selection: it's been available for ages. And researchers (remember them?) see evidence that in the United States, as everywhere else, couples are picking boys. A study at the University of CT Health Center looked at the ratio of live births in the U.S. and found evidence that couples were selecting for boys (Prenat Diagn. 2011 Jun;31(6):560-5. doi: 10.1002/pd.2747. Epub 2011 Mar 27). A second study at the Department of Economics, Columbia University looked at the census and found "son-biased sex ratios" (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 15;105(15):5681-2. Epub 2008 Mar 31). This is not to mention the strong bias for sons in China and India which threatens to create a worldwide male majority. AIDS, which disproportionately affects women in Sub-Saharan Africa, may contribute to this male future.

Since virtually every country in the world with birth rates above replacement levels is Muslim, one might look at the evidence and worry about the end of women. "Hooking up" is punishable by death in some countries.

But who cares about evidence when you can interview a small, all-female sample, throw around some anecdotes and get more hype than, well, a real journalist? Credulous Amazon buyers will praise this because it's familiar and makes them feel good. It keeps them vaguely amused and pleased until next month's book about male obsolescence (or maybe a musical?).

And why? Because readers like to hear their group praised.
153 of 168 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Fascinating points often overwhelmed by sample bias 10 Sep 2012
By Indy Reviewer - Published on
Format:Hardcover|Vine Customer Review of Free Product (What's this?)
Hanna Rosin's "The End of Men" is an interesting but not fully satisfying look at the economic progress of women, the relative economic decline of men, and the societal effects of both. While the book treats the first two subjects quite thoughtfully, Rosin doesn't do as well when she explores the broader implications of this shift. A troubling and repeated tendency towards sample bias weakens many of her arguments, and even the author admits that her initial thesis probably isn't correct. Still, it's an interesting read, but not nearly the landmark work that has been suggested in some quarters. 3 stars.

Despite the claims of the well-oiled marketing push behind the book, many of the topics here aren't novel. Goldberg's The Hazards of Being Male was among the first to notice a relative decline for men back in the 1970s, Faludi's Stiffed was referenced by Rosin as motivation for her Atlantic article of the same title (although oddly, that controversial reference nearly disappears in the book), and Save the Males and Manning Up have been more recent, albeit openly polemic, entries. On the economic rise of women, the far-less hyped The Richer Sex is a recent general release covering much the same territory, and there is a wealth of academic material on many of the subjects.

The originality of "The End of Men" is in how it combines the overt economic and social gains made by women with the contrast of the relative economic decline of men. Summarizing much of her book in a sentence, women are at parity in many professions, have moved ahead in education, and the younger generation of men are falling further and further behind. Rosin's work on this is insightful, and had she stayed on this topic this would have been a much shorter, 5 star review.

Unfortunately, the author goes off track during her projection of societal changes caused by this economic shift. Many of her guesses appear reasonable, but in the course of trying to make her points the author repeatedly cherry picks data. The result is a far weaker book.

One instance where this makes a chapter miss badly is on how economic parity has affected mate selection and sexual choices. Much as Stepp does in Unhooked and Bogle does in Hooking Up, Rosin notes that many young women play the hookup culture just as viciously as their male counterparts. Building off Baumeister and Vohs' theory of "sexual economics", Rosin then adds a reasonable and interesting twist to the debate: perhaps women's new found academic and economic equality may have a role in their sexual behavior.

However, as she attempts to advance "may have" to "does", Rosin loses the objective reader as she ignores arguments that might not fit her point. For instance, there is nary a mention of what both epidemiologists and economists believe is a major factor in the rise of casual sex: the perception of lower consequences for acquiring STIs versus a generation ago. A pithy but accurate cultural snapshot of this view are Nirvana's "I'm so horny, but that's ok, my will is good" versus Girls' "All adventurous women (have a couple different strains of HPV)".

In a strange turn, although Rosin has hired controversial sociologist Mark Regnerus to write several Slate articles on the subject, she doesn't address one of his main conclusions in what is the most robust work on the sex lives of young Americans, Premarital Sex in America. To Regnerus, the data suggest that the "hookup culture" is less prevalent in overall society and more a function of limited time and potential mates at elite schools rather than a massive societal change. As it turns out, the most egregious practitioners of this culture are neither elite nor particularly concerned with education and economic equality. Instead, they're young Americans who aren't college educated, and he pointedly warns about Stepp's results being biased by her selection of elite university students.

Despite this, Rosin is undeterred and proceeds directly to Yale for interviews. Her focus group for the dating behavior of "hard hearted" professional women becomes Wall Street traders, a curious choice as even their colleagues in finance consider that group as rather spectacular (to put it mildly) outliers of social behavior regardless of their gender. The dating behavior of men is largely ignored save for their desire for sex. As such, they are summarily divided into "player" and "loser" classes, which allows Rosin to conclude that the "free agents" of the player class are uninterested in relationships. To the author, the combination of their interests combined with women "dominating campuses" clearly result in the "Girls Gone Wild culture". This disappoints on both the practical level - an exploration of her later observation that women have continued to use traditional criteria like income and career prospects for selecting their partners and have firmly resisted "marrying down" would have been far more relevant to the overall picture she's painting - and is disturbingly poor scholarship.

As she continues exploring the new cultural landscape, the problematic trend of selection bias continues and becomes especially troubling during her discussion of dysfunctional men and their even more dysfunctional relationships in Alexander City, a former mill town that has seen better days. Troy spends his days sitting around in a trailer with a child while his stripper girlfriend Shannon pays the bills and complains she has "two babies at home", Charles files his unemployment claim with two of his former subordinates while his executive wife complains about his "brooding" and tells him to "get over it", and in a broad swath of stereotyping seemingly all Japanese men are more enamored with virtual girls than real ones.

It's easy to believe that social structures in places like Alexander City have been upended in the debris trail of economic displacement, and that it's entirely possible more women than men have adapted to the new reality of what jobs are actually available locally (as the author notably doesn't explore the lives of the ex-Russell employees nicknamed "transients" who commute to jobs elsewhere.) However, Rosin's repeated selection of interview subjects that seem to be bottom-of-the-barrel brings up the suspicion that perhaps one reason they were chosen was because a more representative sample wouldn't have produced quite the results she wants.

One of the most egregious examples of this arises in her chapter on the "balanced" see-saw marriage of the educated class. Steven, the male half of the example, is still trying to figure out how to complete law school in his late 30s and is a stay-at-home-dad - and his interpretation of the latter role seems to include letting his child smear feces on the wall until his wife comes home to clean it up. There are tens of millions of alternating dual-career couples who have been a lot more successful in balancing things out, millions of stay at home dads who raise children more conventionally, and a decent amount of academic work on how they do so; surely one or two of them could have been found to be brought into her narrative. Rosin's choices repeatedly smack of selection bias for even those otherwise sympathetic to her overall point, and it's a real disappointment.

This is probably linked with the book's final problem. As Rosin admits in the introduction, she began her work with the belief that "womanly" traits were becoming more important in this new era than "manly" ones, but found this answer wasn't supported by what she'd researched. Despite this, the author clearly struggles with the temptation to try to push her original thesis. Many problems arise as a result; the weak chapter on the rise of female violence and the odd claim that changes in a factory she visits are from the adoption of non-patriarchal values rather than 30 years of refining industrial management are but two of several examples where the book gets sidetracked. Rosin is certainly within her rights to choose how to raise her children as she sees fit - she concludes the real problem here is that males aren't "flexible" enough and that she should be raising her sons with the "womanly" trait of "bending" - but as a writer she would have been far better off if she'd employed a little flexibility of her own in giving more leeway to an editor to clean this up.

All this is a shame, because even some of Rosin's more controversial points are worth considering. 3 stars. Worth a read, but not nearly worth the hype.
48 of 53 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Ridiculous, Hateful, Harmful to Both Men and Women and Wrongheaded! 14 Dec 2012
By Anastasia McPherson - Published on
I first became aware of Hanna Rosin when a member of a group I belong to posted a link to Ms. Rosin's lecture about the same subject matter. I had my doubts even about the title of the lecture and the book, but persevered because I am aware of the fact that middle and upper middle class women, based purely on grades, are now occupying more seats in college and the professional schools and was curious to see what was being made of this phenomenon. I will merely point out, that the gains Rosin mentions are limited to a very narrow segment of the middle to upper middle class and completely ignore working class and poor women and leave the economic interpretation of that to the readers of this review.

Based on Hanna Rosin's lecture and her book I can only conclude that Hanna Rosin hates men and doesn't wish for the human race to actually evolve, but for hatred, aggression and misunderstanding to prevail. One of her first comments in the lecture, was that she wasn't against men, after all, "she herself owned three." I am not kidding, this is an exact quote. Imagine Rosin's ire if her husband had said the same about her and her daughter. Or insert black person or Jew for man and see how offensive the comment really is if it isn't apparent already.

I think that the recent up tick in women in the professions could be a good thing for society - we might actually be able to figure out how to best take advantage of everybody's talents and strengths at different times in their life cycle and do things that are good for everybody and increase human productivity and happiness. Ms. Rosin seems intent upon taking a very small portion of the middle and upper middle class, applying this sample across the board whether it fits the facts or not and exacting revenge for millennia of male oppression and aggression by replacing it with female aggression. In one portion of the book, Rosin, as another reviewer mentioned, extols the wonderful new female aggression and its benefits by citing an instance where a group of black girls pushed a white middle-aged man around a subway platform and bullied him. This is admirable? This is what we as women should emulate? Really? Again, imagine the roles reversed with a group of men harrowing a young black woman on a subway platform. Those men would be looking at a discussion with the law at the very least and the women should be too. Equality also means responsibility, it doesn't just mean that more rich white girls get to go to college.

Finally, Rosin seems so privileged that she is unaware that the world required physical upkeep, especially the complex world of technological civilization. Rosin dismisses the need for the applied engineering and practicality of many blue collar jobs, traditionally and still done by men as being done by "robot" in the future. Really. Men still do a lot of the thankless, hard and dangerous tasks that keep this world running for the rest of us and rubbing their nose in the s*** they shovel is not going to make things better for anyone.

Channeling male aggression that is the result of testosterone and training has always been a challenge for civilization. I don't deny that and finding positive outlets for natural male behavior in a late technological society has proven difficult just at the moment. But, we are facing huge challenges as a species and a planet and it will take the combined will and work of men and women to meet the coming challenges. We will probably be stupid and repeat our history of war and violence, which will make men even more valuable. No doubt Ms. Rosin will be the first to seek protection in a dangerous situation, but if she had her way in this book men would be what exterminated? Disappeared? Spontaneously vanish?

Women, it turns out, when given a level playing field are smarter than they have previously been given credit for and can excel in the trades and professions given a chance. I don't think this is news and any woman in history could have privately told you this even when it was socially unacceptable. But this fact doesn't in turn make men useless or stupid themselves. What it could do is open up new ways for women and men to work together for the good of all - instead she is spreading hatred. Rosin also dismisses a fact of life that feminism has been ignoring for forty years. Women are physically weaker than men, yes there are a few examples of athletes, but for the most part this is an across the board fact. Male aggression has often used this fact against us, combined with the fact that women are more vulnerable while pregnant and when they have small children.

A wrongheaded, poison penned diatribe that causes trouble for everyone, doesn't explore how the gains of a small number of women could be folded into a different kind of cooperation between the sexes, ignores poor women and those not meant for the white collar professions completely and seems to consider men vermin. Just nasty and I would be offended if any man wrote of women this way and they have. This is not progress, this is the same kind of mistakes people have been making forever in promulgating hatred.
31 of 34 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Feminism for the Petty Bourgeois 21 Sep 2012
By Mr. Graeme L. Willis - Published on
In this book Rosin argues that women are better suited to the new economy which has followed the great recession. Drawing from cherry-picked examples, Rosin has surveyed the damage after the great recession and sketches how these changes have been positive for American women living in the new post-Industrial American economy.

Since the seventies, the middle class has been shrinking due to structural changes in the economy. Middle and lower class men have been the losers and have faced flat wages and job losses in American manufacturing for decades.

Rosin views this from afar and uses this as evidence of the failure of men to adapt to the new surroundings we now see in post-Industrial America. To Rosin, this is the new normal and quite acceptable state of affairs and men should have seen this coming.

In the first chapter, Rosin has profiled selected successful business women and promiscuous college co-eds. To Rosin, the average promiscuous college student is quite flexible, ergo well suited to the new economy. This is actually her argument.

Rosin cherry picks examples of successful women working as strippers, lawyers, and service sector drones. Since these women are treading water in the low-wage low growth economy, they are winners.

Rosin cherry picks examples of men come from the now dead manufacturing sector, frat boys and video game addicts, ergo men are useless.

This book is terrible and full of self selection bias, i was expecting better.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category