- Hardcover: 340 pages
- Publisher: Hutchinson (19 Jan 2006)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0091800137
- ISBN-13: 978-0091800130
- Product Dimensions: 23.6 x 15.2 x 3.6 cm
- Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars See all reviews (16 customer reviews)
-
Amazon Bestsellers Rank:
175,712 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #86 in Books > History > Archaeology > By Period > Classical Greek & Roman
 Trade In this Item for up to £9.10
Trade in The Elgin Marbles for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £9.10, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Plus, get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Product Description
This highly readable book by an exceptional young archaeologist tells the story of the Parthenon from its origins to the present day, in a sweeping narrative which combines a careful presentation of the archaeology of the Parthenon with a historical survey of the Acropolis throughout its history. Wide-ranging, authoritative and fascinating, Dorothy King's book raises important questions about the ownership of works of art, and imaginatively recreates the Athenian world in which the Parthenon was built.
From the Publisher
A brilliant and controversial young archaeologist rekindles the drama of classical Greece for a new readership and traces the history of the Parthenon and the disputed Elgin Marbles.
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
23 of 25 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
This is a badly written book which reads like a first draft and needs the service of a decent editor. The main problem is repetition. Another problem is repetition, so we are repeatedly told the same thing as if for the first time on several occasions. For instance the removal of a Caryatid from Eleusis by Clarke is told three times in the space of a dozen pages. At one point she manages to repeat herself in the same paragraph.
Dr. King's attempt at narrative history founders on her inability to control her subject matter in a disciplined manner. The plot leaps backwards and forward leaving the reader bewildered. For example, the `Nisbets' are recorded as having returned to Scotland, yet in the following paragraph are still in the Levant. I found myself repeatedly flicking back through the pages with a furrowed brow wondering what I had missed.
One page 222 we are told that `Lancret' was able to read the Greek inscription on the Rosetta stone. This is the only mention of him in the entire book. Who is he? I don't know, the author didn't tell me. On page 21 Miltiades is mentioned, but has to wait several more pages before he is actually introduced as a Greek General.
The really annoying chapter of the book is the one on Marbles themselves. The publishers do not include a plan of the Parthenon, so it is almost impossible to keep track of the descriptions. There is no glossary. The use of abstruse architectural terminology could have been softened with an explanatory diagram but isn't. The end result is confusion and frustration rather then enlightenment.
I am annoyed by this book, as there is a much better book within it. Clearly the publishers had little faith in the work otherwise they would have printed it on better quality paper. As it is, within ten years this book will look older than the marbles themselves.
Dr. King's attempt at narrative history founders on her inability to control her subject matter in a disciplined manner. The plot leaps backwards and forward leaving the reader bewildered. For example, the `Nisbets' are recorded as having returned to Scotland, yet in the following paragraph are still in the Levant. I found myself repeatedly flicking back through the pages with a furrowed brow wondering what I had missed.
One page 222 we are told that `Lancret' was able to read the Greek inscription on the Rosetta stone. This is the only mention of him in the entire book. Who is he? I don't know, the author didn't tell me. On page 21 Miltiades is mentioned, but has to wait several more pages before he is actually introduced as a Greek General.
The really annoying chapter of the book is the one on Marbles themselves. The publishers do not include a plan of the Parthenon, so it is almost impossible to keep track of the descriptions. There is no glossary. The use of abstruse architectural terminology could have been softened with an explanatory diagram but isn't. The end result is confusion and frustration rather then enlightenment.
I am annoyed by this book, as there is a much better book within it. Clearly the publishers had little faith in the work otherwise they would have printed it on better quality paper. As it is, within ten years this book will look older than the marbles themselves.
15 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Without doubt the worst and most annoying book I purchased (silly me) during 2007. The 'argument' is shockingly unbalanced and prejudiced - in favour of Elgin when we do finally get there, and against Byron whose stance is seriously misrepresented. It is also littered with inaccuracies and historical errors en route: Demosthenes was a 'famous Greek philosopher' apparently, the date of Athens turning democratic is wrong, dates in modern Greek history are distorted or ignored in order to prop up the 'Elgin' case etc. etc. On top of that, it is tediously repetitous and in places almost even self-contradictory. Don't publishers employ competent editors who know anything any more? Or can edit? (answer: remarkably few, unfortunately). It isn't even a good polemic - for which a case might, just might, be made. Some of the history of the Parthenon is actually interesting and has some value for a general readership, but this is blown by the dubious quality of what surrounds it. Zeus preserve us from some pea-brained TV executive thinking there is a glib programme lurking somewhere in this deeply flawed effort with the self-promoting 'PhDiva' queening it up as presenter...
The author in the Acknowledgements makes a gratuitously catty remark about Evangelos Venizelos, former Greek Culture Minister, not having answered her questions - adding 'but politicians rarely do'. Given 'Dr' King's approach to accuracy and balance, others might also consider that to be rather good advice.
The author in the Acknowledgements makes a gratuitously catty remark about Evangelos Venizelos, former Greek Culture Minister, not having answered her questions - adding 'but politicians rarely do'. Given 'Dr' King's approach to accuracy and balance, others might also consider that to be rather good advice.
24 of 31 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Dr King's book has been reviewed by the press it's been long ago (since last year if not mistaken), and there are used books already at Amazon, so why is she accusing people of writing reviews before having read it? I recently read a review by "The Independent" online, which was hardly of praise for the book. Personally I found the book, but also Dr King's Press talks, quite aggressive and passionate and I wonder why and whether this is an appropriate academic behaviour. In addition, I expected to read a book of academic standards, so I did not appreciate the rambling at certain parts and the tasteless jokes and gossips about politicians such as M. Merkouri. Finally, archaeological inaccuracies complete the picture. For example, the Parthenon was mainly a temple devoted to Athena, despite its other uses by the people of Athens. Before the present 5th century BC building there was another Parthenon under construction, but it was destroyed by the Persian attacks. The Parthenon was definitely a building that stood out on Acropolis, and its decorations could be seen clearly, especially as the naturally honey-coloured marble (that the British Museum turned to bright white with surface destruction!) and the individual figures sculpted on it were coloured with bright colours, like red and blue. This is known by few, as the Victorians spread the wrong impression that the Greek temples were 'white as doves'.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
A lively and readable history on a fascinating topic
I enjoyed this book very much, it is easy to read despite the scale and complexity of the subject. The detailed two-thousand-year history which it presents of the Parthenon, and of... Read more
Published on 4 July 2009 by Fred
Lacks lustre.
A thorough if repetitive re-hash of the same old arguments. Needs a good edit.
Ms King needs to travel more to shake off her fearful British stuffiness. Read more
Ms King needs to travel more to shake off her fearful British stuffiness. Read more
Published on 26 Mar 2007 by Charlie Williams
Simply brilliant
In this scholarly yet wholly accessible volume, Dr King explains the history of the Elgin Marbles and where they fit into Western civilisation. Read more
Published on 12 Nov 2006 by Adrian Murdoch
Whose Marbles are They?
Dorothy King has given us a good read. While the book is titled "The Elgin Marbles," it offers much more. Read more
Published on 10 July 2006 by Peter K. Tompa
Excellent
Any book that takes a firm stance on the Marbles is going to polarise opinion. For my part, I really enjoyed Dorothy King's history and argument.
Published on 2 Jun 2006 by Suzanne
Clear and superb treatment of this complex and very controversial...
Much has been said and written about this book already. To be honest, the discussions and angry reviews clearly show two main points: the reviewers have clearly not read this fine... Read more
Published on 13 April 2006 by Jesper Jensen
Superb popular treatment of a complex topic!
After taking a quick look at the rabid reviews of this book, I immediately purchased it. I was not dissappointed. Read more
Published on 21 Feb 2006 by P. Schultz
Prejudiced and unreliable
There are several valuable, scientifically prestigious, editions about Acropolis monuments and their impact today. Read more
Published on 21 Feb 2006 by "phidias1821"
Great Story
I've been looking for a good popular history of the Parthenon, and this is the first one I've found. Read more
Published on 7 Feb 2006 by Rose Tascher
Not a Good Book!
I preordered the book and received it a few days ago. I have to be honest and say that this book is really bad. It reads for like a science fiction novel. Read more
Published on 3 Feb 2006 by "sweetsicle"
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
