I'm a parent. I have young girls in KS1 who "don't like maths" and who are "no good at it". I personally found maths fun at school, college and university, now in my job and even more so in my leisure time. So I couldn't understand my girls' attitude.
The other day my seven year-old had a homework worksheet with about 20 questions. It was something like adding two numbers in the range 50..100. She first declared that she couldn't do it. Then we picked an easy one and worked through it together - she counted-on in her head and in fact completed the whole thing without help. Before starting the next question she had dropped her pen, twice, swivelled around on her chair and asked if we were finished yet. She declared again that she couldn't do it. Again she did it by herself, counting on, only this time she was slightly off because she'd miscounted. It was at this point that I decided to cut the session short. This was not the first time, I was failing, and I needed help.
I've never read any book in this field before. The Elephant in the Classroom was not what I was expecting. I was looking for something practical, perhaps some maths problems to work through together or guidance on how things are taught these days, such as multiplication "groups" and "number squares". What I got was something aimed at changing the way maths is taught in the UK. To my surprise this was both enjoyable and compelling. I found several reasons that helped to explain my daughters' attitudes. These reasons were more complex than I had ever imagined. These are the sort of issues that would make you change your vote or join the PTA. Many of the issues are demonstrated by serious, long-term studies, with startling results. There are examples of the dire maths questions posed in maths classes today, and great examples of really intricate problems that have inspired and delighted pupils of all abilities.
It turns out that the fact my daughter had been given a worksheet with 20 questions is a red flag in itself. The questions were too easy. She didn't know why she was doing them. They bored her. She was mechanically applying rules rather than discovering new ones. Jo Boaler declares "this is not maths", and I wholeheartedly agree.
I have since returned to that worksheet with my daughter, only this time we picked one question, 57 + 84, and discarded the rest. We focused on trying to find all the different ways in which we could answer that question, together. Obviously there was counting-on, but we agreed that was tricky with such big numbers. We got out some beads but gave up, now understanding why we don't always use the same techniques. We then started to break the numbers up and focus on the tens while ignoring the units. My daughter suggested that we treat the tens as units, 5 + 8, and then add the zeros back afterwards. I suggested swapping the units around, 7 and 4, so we could add a small number to a big number and count-on more easily. In the end we had half a dozen solutions to the same problem, we had *both* learnt new ways of doing it, and more importantly we had fun.
Only four stars because I would have liked more example problems aimed at primary school children.