- Hardcover: 224 pages
- Publisher: Granta Books (1 Sep 2008)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 184708043X
- ISBN-13: 978-1847080431
- Product Dimensions: 20 x 13.4 x 3.6 cm
- Average Customer Review: 4.1 out of 5 stars See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 288,503 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
'A curiosity cabinet of spurious reasoning and spin ... Every society needs its guardian of good sense: Baggini is ours' --Financial Times
Review
'A book to treasure for Baggini's never-miss lucidity'
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
If you are looking for an in-depth look at rhetorical methods then look elsewhere. This is light, fluffy reading and those with more than average awareness will find little to chew on. That said it does make for a quick read and makes plenty of valid points, albeit often pretty obvious ones. If you read the media without looking behind the language then you should be read this or something similar. The only problem of course is that the book is really designed for those who would not read a book on the subject. Catch 22. The tone is a trifle inconsistent, veering between chatty to more measured and, sorry to say, includes some hideous modern office-style slang, which will date terribly. He is also obviously trying hard to be fair to everybody, admirable but not always entertaining. The best joke: sweeping statements are always wrong. Nice. It reads as if the author is holding back and only really comes alive when he starts bringing out the big guns and pointing out the philosophic arguments that underpin the destruction of the fallacies and takes a proper swing at something. The book itself suffers from amateur-looking typesetting (including huge leading), poor fonts and could certainly have done with a better editor to weed out the occasionally bizarre word choices. Good, but not what it could have been. Next time please let go a little.
16 of 17 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
I am a firm fan of Baggini's previous works, but I have to say this is my favourite and in my view his best. I have been aware of some of the most common tricks used in arguments, but this book helps to clarify and contextualise the sleights of hand often used either knowingly or unwittingly by those trying to convince us. The chapters are short and punchy and I continually found myself thinking 'oh go on then...one more chapter and then put it down'. The only warning I would issue is that if you wish to retain healthy relationships with friends and loved ones, avoid shouting 'false dichotomy!' or 'post-hoc fallacy!' whilst watching the news or reading the newspaper. Perhaps a knowing smile, or a wry shake of the head will suffice...
Overall, an uncommon combination: an accessible book, but one that makes the reader feel genuinely 'educated' after dipping into it.
Overall, an uncommon combination: an accessible book, but one that makes the reader feel genuinely 'educated' after dipping into it.
8 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
In the 'The Duck that won the Lottery', 100 different logical fallacies are explained clearly and concisely. Each fallacy is initially presented by giving a well known argument that contains it, then the fallacy is explained and then a more subtle argument that may or may not contain the fallacy is provided. The clear objective is to make the reader think.
There are four reasons why I really like this book:
1.
By using simple but relevant examples to explain each fallacy, Baggini makes things easy to read and easy to understand. For example, not everyone knows what a false dichotomy is, even though many of us thought Bush's infamous: "You are either with us or the terrorists" sounded a bit dodgy.
By using this approach something esoteric becomes non - esoteric.
2.
After presenting an obvious example that contains a fallacy, he presents another argument which may or may not contain the very same fallacy. Things aren't as obvious and a bit more thought is required.
The intent here is obviously to make the reader question their own opinions. Yes it's easy, to pick other people's arguments apart but the chances are many of our own are a bit faulty. We may just have to think a bit more to realise that.
3.
After several well known arguments are shown to be just more examples of sloppy thinking, there is a subtle reminder that bad logic is just ubiquitous. Most arguments are poorly thought out and contain not much more than catchy rhetoric. This is remarkable considering the origins of logic go back over 2,500 to Aristotle et al and we are still struggling to come up to speed with it.
4.
Have you ever heard an argument which you think didn't make sense but you just couldn't explain exactly what was wrong with it? This book would definitely razor sharpen your ability to pick a hole in any argument. But that said, an over indulgence in this pastime may quickly loose friends as the reality is very few opinions are logical. There's usually a subjective assumption or a leap of logic between premise and conclusion.
All that said, I have read five of Baggini's books now. They are usually excellent - this book, no exception. In fact, it's probably his best yet. I would even go so far as to say it's my favourite book of 2008.
There are four reasons why I really like this book:
1.
By using simple but relevant examples to explain each fallacy, Baggini makes things easy to read and easy to understand. For example, not everyone knows what a false dichotomy is, even though many of us thought Bush's infamous: "You are either with us or the terrorists" sounded a bit dodgy.
By using this approach something esoteric becomes non - esoteric.
2.
After presenting an obvious example that contains a fallacy, he presents another argument which may or may not contain the very same fallacy. Things aren't as obvious and a bit more thought is required.
The intent here is obviously to make the reader question their own opinions. Yes it's easy, to pick other people's arguments apart but the chances are many of our own are a bit faulty. We may just have to think a bit more to realise that.
3.
After several well known arguments are shown to be just more examples of sloppy thinking, there is a subtle reminder that bad logic is just ubiquitous. Most arguments are poorly thought out and contain not much more than catchy rhetoric. This is remarkable considering the origins of logic go back over 2,500 to Aristotle et al and we are still struggling to come up to speed with it.
4.
Have you ever heard an argument which you think didn't make sense but you just couldn't explain exactly what was wrong with it? This book would definitely razor sharpen your ability to pick a hole in any argument. But that said, an over indulgence in this pastime may quickly loose friends as the reality is very few opinions are logical. There's usually a subjective assumption or a leap of logic between premise and conclusion.
All that said, I have read five of Baggini's books now. They are usually excellent - this book, no exception. In fact, it's probably his best yet. I would even go so far as to say it's my favourite book of 2008.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
The Talented Mr Baggini
An absolute gem of applied reasoning for the real world. Don't let anyone try to persuade you otherwise. Read more
Published 13 months ago by MRS V M TIPPLE
You're on your last chance Baggini
I think I keep going back to Baggini's works because I really enjoyed 'The Pig that Wants to be Eaten' and want to read some more similarly mind expanding stuff. Read more
Published 18 months ago by N. Chivers
Excellent if a little pedantic
As a follow up to The Pig That Wants to be Eaten: And Ninety-nine Other Thought Experiments this is a resounding success. Read more
Published on 27 Jan 2010 by SAP
A light introduction to logic
Maybe it's not very profound, but I appreciated his factual approach to the ways of bad reasoning and how to avoid them Sometimes obvious, sometimes pointing out unthought-of... Read more
Published on 4 Sep 2009 by Ventura Angelo
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
