The Declining Significance of Homophobia, by Mark McCormack, is, according to its author, a `good news story'. The good news being that homophobia amongst young people is on the wane. His research with mainly young men students in three English sixth forms reaches very different conclusions to that of the more sobering surveys by LGBT organisations such as Stonewall.
McCormack tells us that the young people he studied do not marginalize and discriminate against each other on the basis of sexual orientation, or even perceived orientation. This is because homophobia has declined in our culture, since the `homohysteria' that characterised the 1980s and 1990s. He also looks at language, and argues convincingly that in many contexts, young people's use of the term `gay' to mean `lame' or `rubbish' is not homophobic, but merely a sign of changing times, and linguistic shifts.
I agree with McCormack that attitudes are changing and expanding, to accommodate a more accepting approach, both towards homosexuality, and towards `feminine' behaviours amongst men, (think David Beckham in a sarong, or Alex Reid in women's lingerie). However I have a few problems with his reasoning, and with the identity politics he uses to explain and celebrate this change.
One weakness of the book is a lack of depth of understanding on the part of McCormack about the history of homophobia. He relies almost solely on the work of his `mentor' Eric Anderson to explain how homophobic attitudes gripped the (western) world during the 1980s and 1990s, when AIDS was seen by many as a `gay plague'. And when the age of consent was higher for homosexual men than for heterosexuals. Other writers who are missing from McCormack's book who have carefully examined the recent history of homophobia, include Mark Simpson (Anti- Gay 1996), David Halperin (How To Do The History of Homosexuality, 2004), Steven Zeeland (Barrack Buddies 1993) and Keith Boykin (Beyond The Down Low 2005).
Whilst the end of the 20th century was indeed a bleak time in many ways for sexual freedom, in others it was positive. `Gay culture' went mainstream in the 80s and 90s, with bands such as The Smiths, Culture Club, The Pet Shop Boys and Erasure topping the charts. Fashion and advertising began to exploit the `pink pound', with models such as Marky Mark showing off their `assets' to gay consumers.
I think McCormack is also wrong to focus as heavily as he does on `gay' identities and `gay rights' politics. One thing I remember most fondly about the 90s was the explosion of debate and activism around the concept of queer. But McCormack is very dismissive of this `queer turn', and in particular of writers such as Judith Butler who he describes as `elitist' and `obscure'. He reverts to the use of `gay' identity politics and `gay' terminology to describe and represent all LGBT people.
I have one final criticism of McCormack's book, which extends to a general criticism of masculinities theory overall - it relates to what could be seen as an unmentioned, unacceptable great big pink `elephant in the room'. The elephant's name? Metrosexuality. I think McCormack's thesis and research would be improved immensely by giving serious consideration to this `21st century' phenomenon, of men expressing their `desire to be desired' via consumer and media culture. According to Mark Simpson, originator and key theorist of the concept of metrosexuality,
`Contrary to what you have been told, metrosexuality is not about flip-flops and facials, man-bags or manscara. Or about men becoming `girlie' or `gay'. It's about men becoming everything. To themselves. In much the way that women have been for some time. It's the end of the sexual division of bathroom and bedroom labour. It's the end of sexuality as we've known it.' (Simpson 2011)
It does not make sense to me, that a world in which the oppressive and repressive phenomenon of homophobia is declining and even disappearing, would also be a world in which sexual identity categories such as `gay' remain unchanged. The `end of sexuality as we've known it' is a difficult concept to grasp, especially for those of us who have been discriminated against because of our sexuality, and who consider it a key aspect of our identities. But I think it is on the horizon. For, to quote one of my favourite homos ever, Christopher Isherwood, `we're all queer in the end'.