I came to this book fresh from reading her two novels, full of expectation. But it's disappointing. She simply doesn't seem at home in this genre. In an essay form she tries to expand her sharp observations into longer arguments, with definitions and examples, and counter-examples etc. It's not a mode she seems at ease with, and too often her points become sketchy and even amateurish in their polemical style. I winced (because of the awkwardness of it) where it reads weakly like a newspaper column griping about modern America and the loss of its Christian (ie Calvinist) heritage. The book does try sometimes at the theological side of it all, but it wants to have a general readership as well as a scholarly one at ease with the history of ideas and with theology, and it becomes stranded between the two. So if you've not read Robinson yet, I'd advise sticking to the two wonderful novels. 'Gilead' is her most serious working through of the puritan heritage, done not in essay form but in layered narration and meditative prose.