In the United States the distributors advertised this film as a prequel--horrid word--to "The Queen," which, of course it is not. Since I am an avid follower of British Politics, though--being addicted to BBC "Democracy Live" and "Any Questions?"--I found it riveting.
Stephen Frears has created a fascinating depiction of the two politicians at the outset of their careers, who were to dominate British politics--for better or worse, depending on one's view--for thirteen years. He has also given us a glimpse into what, in Shakespeare's hands, might have been a single scene in one of his political tragedies.
"The Deal" presents Gordon Brown, beautifully portrayed by David Morrissey, as a man of sincerity who is motivated politically by an earnest and zealous desire for reform; who cherishes the leadership of the Labour Party (and future as Prime Minister, should the party eventually come to power) as a goal to be sought as a prize of honour for diligent work. Fate intercedes in the form of the young, eager, charismatic and increasingly ambitious attorney, Tony Blair--Michael Sheen turns in his usual nuanced portrayal--whom the more politically experienced Brown befriends and mentors in the House of Commons. The director leaves Blair's motivations ambiguous though, only implying the moment when he decides to seize the power; whether he does so by chance or by design is left to the viewers to decide. David Morrissey's sensitive portrayal of Brown, however, conveys the wounded pride of a man who recognises--too late--that his lifelong ambition is being usurped by a plausible chancer who values the party leadership--not from conviction, but only as a means to an end.
The devil in "The Deal" is Peter Mandelson (aka "The Prince of Darkness" in some political circles), MP and Party Spin Doctor, who, in an opportune change of allegiance, chooses Blair's easy charm over Brown's difficult dourness as the most likely winning ticket from the Opposition to the Government side of the House of Commons. The tragedy comes in retrospect, because the viewer knows that although both men achieved their aims--first Blair, and then, belatedly, Brown--in the final estimation, the prize, which they each coveted so dearly, eventually disintegrated, leaving their respective reputations--as far as public opinion is concerned--in tatters.
The subject of the dynamics of ambition, power and the role of the media is particularly relevant today, in light of the ongoing "phone hacking" scandal which keeps threatening to consume the political discourse on both sides of the Atlantic.