I was once discussing the Cyprus problem with a young German woman. While she told me that she loved the island, she could not comprehend why in 2004, the two communities could not come together and reunite the island. She was drawing parallels with Germany and the Berlin wall, and Nicosia and the buffer zone which still divides the island's capital into the South of Cyprus, controlled by the legitimate government of the Republic of Cyprus, and the North, which is under the control of the illegal self-declared state called the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) and the Turkish troops that control the area since 1974. While I tried to explain to her the difference between Berlin and Nicosia, she seemed unable to grasp the idea of Greek and Turkish nationalism, enosis (union with Greece) and taksim (separation), ideas that have shaped the history and life of Cyprus. It occurred to me that the Cyprus dispute seems to be generally unapproachable to people that have not been raised on the island, and for good reason.
Cyprus is a unique place. It has developed since its independence in 1960 from a new, decolonized state, to one of the most militarized areas in the whole world. The cause for this has been the Cyprus problem, the main political issue that has affected the island since its independence in 1960. Far from being a simple political issue, the Cyprus problem has been shaped by a number of different factors - political, historical, social, cultural, ethnic and so on. It has evolved to be a complex and confusing issue, that still shapes everyday life on the island. The memory of the bloody conflict of the 1960s, the Greek coup d'etat and the Turkish invasion that followed in 1974, is still too vivid for both communities that live on the island. It is no wonder that the Cyprus problem and the politics of Cyprus confuse, and are often misunderstood, by outsiders. For one to understand the problem, one has to understand, not only the history, the culture, and the society that has led to it, but also the one that has developed around it. In a sense, one has to understand Cyprus itself.
Mr. James Ker-Lindsay seems to grasp all these fairly well. The book that he has produced is a solid starting point for anyone who wants to understand Cyprus, its politics, but also its everyday life. As an introduction, "The Cyprus Problem: What Everyone Needs to Know", is an excellent, balanced, and up to date explanation of the Cyprus problem, where it came from, and where it is going. For experienced readers on the subject, it might not add much to your knowledge, but it is a great summary for anyone to own. James Ker-Lindsay avoids criticism of historical or political situations and personalities, allowing the reader to reach his/her own conclusions. The book's weakness is, in my opinion, on the history of the island, which I did not find to be clear and analytical enough. However, this is not a history book, and I wouldn't want to review it as one. The history examined is enough to bring the issues Ker-Lindsay discusses into context. Overall, James Ker-Lindsay has succeeded in writing a solid introductory text on the Cyprus dispute, and I would advice it for everyone that is interested in Cyprus.