"The Country Wife" - William Wycherley (1675)
I enjoy re-reading plays for the new ideas they give me about directing them. Sometimes, of course, I wonder what on earth I was thinking the last time I read them, or where other directors get their ideas.
I enjoy this play, but there's no denying it's long for contemporary consumption. Act Five will need a lot of livening up to make it fun for a modern audience. And that's what they're going to be demanding after over two hours of fun.
It's a very talk-y act and we don't really do that these days. Everyone is justifying their behaviour and what they will do in future, or talking about what the public in general think about morals. It's good stuff, but a director would be just too tempted to get out the blue pencil and cut for the sake of getting to the bows
The trouble is that after the "infamous" china scene in Act Four like a casual post-nightclub coupling, the audience will want to get home; they've had the sexual fun and can't usually be bothered with any long chats afterwards.
That's one thing that needs to be dealt with.
I was also thinking about sexism issues: women as chattels, men dominant and selfish, imbalance of power. Then I realised that the characters work against their contemporary mores. The play is a comment on the status quo. Bingo! The characters can stand as they are (we sometimes lose this point in a welter of post-university thought policing). The actors must be fully aware of the implications of seventeenth century law and moral codes in order to play this. This play needs a director and a dramaturg. It needs an equal balance of fun. Therefore, it's a real tightrope walk of a play to produce.
Too serious, and it is a tedious drag, too comic and it becomes trivial sexist nonsense, like a bad "Carry On" (yes, there were some good ones!) More than anything "The Country Wife" needs intelligent actors who are as expert at comic technique as they are at background research, and a director who knows how to mix it.