Any book refuting creationist arguments is welcome, and more so for a book that covers so many fallacies as this one. So that warrants three stars.
However, I felt there were problems with the book. While certainly wide-ranging, it does not go into sufficient detail (perhaps to conserve book length.) Often an argument against a creationist position requires its utter destruction, that ends with creationism not just rebuffed but lampooned, and there are few cases where a simple statement can pull this off. Rather than developing the good counter arguments, the author seems to take a by-the-numbers approach, which leads to some weak, insubstantial or unnecessary points being brought up (and yes, they do exist, even when taking on creationists).
I am aware that this is a handbook, and is intended as a quick reference guide for any non-creationist who feels threatened by a seemingly good argument that they can't refute or just wants to get one up over the evangelist two dorms down, but the book would have benefited from a more proseful, hardhitting, persuasive style. As it is the book is often uncompelling, and it is not difficult to imagine the more "talented" creationists weaving together counterarguments to the unsatisfactorily stated points raised through misrepresentation, logical fallacies, pseudo-scholarship and so on (whereas better presented books are responded to by ignorance). Indeed, looking at creationwiki, this is already taking place.