But not for the obvious reasons. In fact, a better word would probably be "painful" instead of "difficult". I am a huge fan of Coe's, I've read all of his books and I simply couldn't wait to get my hands on The Closed Circle. One thing I've always admired in Coe's books was that he seemed to find it amazingly easy to avoid cliches and contrived plots - everything in his books seemed to flow perfectly and his use of a variety of storytelling techniques always kept me hooked. In The Closed Circle, however, I noticed a tendency on the part of the author to go for the easy route by spelling it out too much. His style was didactic, often patronising, and the jokes were thick-cut. Coe's signature, subtle humour, seemed to have vanished. The other thing that I found really difficult to deal with was the ideology: because I agreed with the anti-war, anti-NF views expressed in the book, it was a real disappointment to see that the discourse didn't go beyond the average "war is evil" analysis. There was no depth. Overall, my feeling after finishing this book was that it was ok but as a huge fan of Coe's, it could have been a hell of a lot better. To me, this was a rushed effort. Too much pressure from Penguin, perhaps?