The premise isn't a bad one: the plot is built around the Cabbalistic idea of 36 righteous beings (Lamed Vovniks) whose existence keeps the universe from descending into chaos. The 36 are getting killed off one by one, and it's up to one man, David Shepherd, to save the world. Of course he isn't alone -- he's got a good-looking female sidekick -- and he's personally involved, since his stepdaughter is one of the Lamed Vovniks. And he doesn't believe in Cabbala in the first place.
I have a high tolerance for stories like this -- I like my airport thrillers. But this one really is terrible.
There are 63 chapters in 348 pages, so an average chapter is only 5 pages long. The chapters skip from one situation to another with breakneck speed, giving the reader no time whatsoever to take an interest in the plot before it moves on again. The characters are one-dimensional and unsympathetic, and the writing style (or styles) can be so bad it's distracting. One villain is described -- in what is supposed to be a tense scene -- as being built like a Bulgarian discus thrower. I rest my case.
If it were just the odd phrase here and there that jarred, I wouldn't mind too much, but the problems run far deeper. Every page is riddled with clichés. Character progression is minimal and contradictory: one minute David's starting to think there might be something to all this Cabbala stuff; the next, he's a rationalist again. It's as if each of the authors wrote their own sections without referring to what the other was doing.
There is no real attempt made to go into any detail about Cabbalistic theology: the few paragraphs devoted to the subject are simplistic in the extreme. The main character is too dull to try and further his understanding, and the reader is left wanting.
The above criticisms aren't in any way comprehensive -- these are just the ones that immediately spring to mind. If you're tempted to buy this book because of the Dan Brown comparisons, don't bother. Dan Brown might have his flaws, but at least his work is readable. 'The Book of Names' has nothing going for it at all.