I have been a Beatles fan since 1964, seen the Beatles in concert here in the US 3 times. Over the years, I've read just about every book on the Beatles, including Hunter Davies, Phillip Norman and other authors who either loved them, or had an ax to grind. Ms. Sutcliffe certainly does a great job in her book of doing such that. I became very concerned when she began to judge and
accuse people that are unable to stand for themselves. The memories of Stuart were beautiful, just adding to the information I've digested about him. She offers a strong statement that Stuart and his life were important to the "birth of the Beatles". However, she gives the impression that Stuart's contribution was dismissed. I don't agree. Stuart has always been representated through the Beatles(or publicists) as a very intelligent, talented young man who made several very positive contributions to the Beatles. I just didn't understand the purpose of the story. Most of it we've read a thousand times. In conclusion, I felt that John Lennon, Paul McCartney and George Harrison were all unfairly represented in this book. John and Stuart are not here to defend anything that was stated in the book.