This is a very well written account of a highly complex episode of diplomacy.
I thoroughly enjoyed the read. The writer has done an excellent job in explicating all the threads of this entangled history. He did this by taking each thread, each piece of the jigsaw and painting the picture in imaginative and colourful detail. So, when he picks up the next thread he backtracks in time and tells the other story which chronologically really runs in parallel. And so forth with the next strands. All the time though he gives you a little glimpse of what the other strands are up to. And so he weaves a magnificent tapestry and you get the full picture of this crucial and colourful saga. (Whilst reading, I was reminded of Tarantino films like e.g. Pulp Fiction, where the chronology is chopped up, but in the end it all comes beautifully together.)
This is an exciting story of high diplomacy, intrigue and counter-intrigue. There is an abundance of great characters. I was left musing on the possibilities of an adventurous mini-series for television. Though I'm focussing here on the readability of the story and on its adventurousness, the writer, in my opinion, treats it with the seriousness it deserves and never forgets the terrible subsequent history of the region.
A commentator of another review (Danny of Arabia) has implied - I think - some bias in this account (though I'm not sure from his comments whether he actually read this book or only some blogs by the author). I don't know enough to judge this, but to me the narrative seemed pretty fair to all parties - but due to lack of knowledge I am unable to tell whether crucial bits of history were left out or distorted etc. Still, the book has whet my appetite for more and surely the more different authors you read the less chance of bias. All in all I recommend this book as a great narration of a complex and sensitive topic which remains relevant today.