Higher education is changing, student numbers are multiplying, and while we might like to teach only by tutorials to five people, it is just not possible. In my time as a lecturer, I have gone from teaching on a programme with an annual intake of 35 to one of 250. Biggs' analysis and very practical advice could not have come at a more crucial time.
Biggs coined the term "constructive alignment" to indicate the way different components of education should support each other - for example, teaching methods and learning outcomes. Somehow in teaching those 250 people we want to motivate as many as possible to engage deeply with the course material, bring about conceptual change not just in the most thoughtful who will engage almost no matter what we do, but in that vast bulk of medium motivated students who can be easily lost or easily gained. For me, thinking about the issues Biggs raises, aligning teaching with assemment, and thinking creatively about both to engage as many students as possible, has been immensely rewarding. Attempts are not always successful of course, but the process of exploring the space of teaching and assessment methods has led me to better places than I was at before.