- Directors: Sidney J. Furie
- Format: Colour
- Language English, German
- Region: Region 2 (This DVD may not be viewable outside Europe. Read more about DVD formats.)
- Aspect Ratio: 16:9 - 2.40:1
- Number of discs: 1
- Studio: Warner Home Video
- Average Customer Review: 2.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (21 customer reviews)
- ASIN: B0011DD1NS
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 30,281 in Film & TV (See Top 100 in Film & TV)
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Product details |
Reviews
This is "Superman IV - The Quest For Peace" - the fourth in the Christopher Reeve series of films. It is UK catalogue number D087002.
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
For all those familliar with the quality of the 3 previous movies then this film will become a bit of a shock.
From the moment the beginning credits start to roll, you sense that there is something badly wrong. The credits try mimic the title sequence of the preceding movies but in a less effective and evidently cheaper fashion, this sadly foreshadows what is to come.
Everything about this film, apart from the performers, reek of bargain basement.
For a movie that is just turning 20 years old, the special effects are awful. Long gone are the cutting edge effects of the previous movies. When Superman is in flight it is either an extremely poorly matted Christopher Reeve nearly static flying through badly shot background footage. Or we have him flying with painfully obvious wire showing. Worst still, an obvious doll is substituted in some scenes.
Although it's meant to be set in America it's obviously been filmed in the UK. Tight close up shots and a scattering of American cars and signs attempt to disguise this without success.
I am a huge fan of Christopher Reeve's performance as Clark Kent and Superman and it is sad to know that this was his swansong in the part. He and the rest of the cast deserved better.
From the moment the beginning credits start to roll, you sense that there is something badly wrong. The credits try mimic the title sequence of the preceding movies but in a less effective and evidently cheaper fashion, this sadly foreshadows what is to come.
Everything about this film, apart from the performers, reek of bargain basement.
For a movie that is just turning 20 years old, the special effects are awful. Long gone are the cutting edge effects of the previous movies. When Superman is in flight it is either an extremely poorly matted Christopher Reeve nearly static flying through badly shot background footage. Or we have him flying with painfully obvious wire showing. Worst still, an obvious doll is substituted in some scenes.
Although it's meant to be set in America it's obviously been filmed in the UK. Tight close up shots and a scattering of American cars and signs attempt to disguise this without success.
I am a huge fan of Christopher Reeve's performance as Clark Kent and Superman and it is sad to know that this was his swansong in the part. He and the rest of the cast deserved better.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
The first 3 Superman movies starring Christopher Reeves are all Good!
Yes, I know, even the third one. The 3rd Superman movie with Richard Pryor had a great story, humour, and special effects way ahead of their time.....It's box office suffered because of peaking VHS copying and piracy at the time....
This film is what happens when you give the actor too much free reign on the direction and script of the movie. The screenplay, acting and special effects are all awful. There is no redeeming factor here.
It will take at least 20 more years before we can recover from the damage done by this movie to the Superman Franchise.........
Perhaps we can pretend that this movie never happened?....and leave the Reeves movies as a trilogy?
Yes, I know, even the third one. The 3rd Superman movie with Richard Pryor had a great story, humour, and special effects way ahead of their time.....It's box office suffered because of peaking VHS copying and piracy at the time....
This film is what happens when you give the actor too much free reign on the direction and script of the movie. The screenplay, acting and special effects are all awful. There is no redeeming factor here.
It will take at least 20 more years before we can recover from the damage done by this movie to the Superman Franchise.........
Perhaps we can pretend that this movie never happened?....and leave the Reeves movies as a trilogy?
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Format:DVD
With new producers, the director of the Ipcress File, all the principal players back and the leading man co-writing the script here was an opportunity to erase the terrible memories of the third film and come up with a return-to-form.
What a waste. The rumour is that only half the budget Cannon Films/Golan/Globus were given to make this fourth instalment was actually used. So instead of a big epic Donner-like revival of the Superman franchise, you get a film which feels like an above-average tv movie.
There are pluses. Christopher Reeve and Gene Hackman make the film come alive when they are on screen and Margot Kidder's Lois Lane is as gorgeous as ever. Also the attempt to make the film relevant to what was still a very real concern regarding the arms race is a brave one.
And that is it as far as the pluses go. Jon Cryer as Lex Luther's dimwitted nephew is annoying, Mark Pillow's Nuclear Man is a cardboard cut-out and Metropolis has been reduced to stock footage of New York and actual footage of an industrial estate in Milton Keynes.
The one major set piece on a Metropolis street is ok but not thrilling and the special effects just don't match up to the original film which was filmed nearly a decade earlier.
A film with a big heart is destroyed by plastic effects and poor editing, knocking the franchise back twenty years in the process. If there is such a thing as the fabled Superman `curse' than it had a field day with this movie.
What a waste. The rumour is that only half the budget Cannon Films/Golan/Globus were given to make this fourth instalment was actually used. So instead of a big epic Donner-like revival of the Superman franchise, you get a film which feels like an above-average tv movie.
There are pluses. Christopher Reeve and Gene Hackman make the film come alive when they are on screen and Margot Kidder's Lois Lane is as gorgeous as ever. Also the attempt to make the film relevant to what was still a very real concern regarding the arms race is a brave one.
And that is it as far as the pluses go. Jon Cryer as Lex Luther's dimwitted nephew is annoying, Mark Pillow's Nuclear Man is a cardboard cut-out and Metropolis has been reduced to stock footage of New York and actual footage of an industrial estate in Milton Keynes.
The one major set piece on a Metropolis street is ok but not thrilling and the special effects just don't match up to the original film which was filmed nearly a decade earlier.
A film with a big heart is destroyed by plastic effects and poor editing, knocking the franchise back twenty years in the process. If there is such a thing as the fabled Superman `curse' than it had a field day with this movie.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
superduff, supernaff
well superman 4 what can i say even when i was seven i didnt really enjoy it, its not the worse movie made christopher reeve & gene hackmen are good in there scenes together. Read more
Published 20 months ago by mr mark mooney
Superman IV: The One Where You Can See the Wires
Superman IV: The One Where You Can See the Wires - sorry, The Quest For Peace - may have started out with the best of intentions, but new producers Cannon's escalating financial... Read more
Published on 21 Mar 2010 by Trevor Willsmer
Superman 4 out of 5
This film is much maligned, and I'm sure you can gather that from some of the other reviews. I will say that again this is one I seen as a kid and did enjoy at the time. Read more
Published on 18 Feb 2010 by Gary Ward
Super review
Ok so Superman 4 got blasted into a bad movie phantom zone, Hey budget cuts and script cuts and editing cuts aside , the film is fun, full of colour and has a great cast... Read more
Published on 25 Jun 2009 by Spice Boy
The End of A Super-Era
While this film is considered a low-point in the Superman series, it still packs enough action and familiar faces to keep Superman fans entertained. Read more
Published on 27 Sep 2008 by S. R.
For completionists only
Superman IV was a disaster from start to finish. Excessive budgetary cuts, very poor quality effects, and being viciously cut and edited add up to a very bad film. Read more
Published on 19 July 2008 by Alex, lord of the bass
Superman is STILL Superman!
I know there have been cuttings of the film thrown onto the floor and lost forever ... thanks to the budget issues with the Salkinds. However, this is STILL Superman! Read more
Published on 7 Dec 2007 by M. Sidhu
not great but deserves som cred
this film is a bad attempt to a superman movie but im sorry after watching superman 3 this seems an academy award winner this isn't as bad as you'd think at least lex luthor is... Read more
Published on 1 Sep 2007 by D. Robinson
Appalling
I have to say that this is the most rubbish and incomplete film ever. The special effects and sound are very badly dated even for the eighties (they look and sound exactly like... Read more
Published on 20 April 2007 by D. Climo
Absolutely appaling film.
I am amazed that anyone could give this film more than 1 star when it doesn't really deserve that. This film is a bit like the movie equivalent of finding a fallen man in the road... Read more
Published on 15 Feb 2005 by Ian Nind
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
