The British comedy scene of from the late eighties to the early years of this century is undeniably fertile subject matter for a book. Unfortunately, Ben Thompson has produced a work which while frequently enjoyable is deeply flawed.
For one thing, Thompson adopts an irritating spoof academic style (extensive footnotes and all) which veers uneasily between the present and past tense throughout. Thinking of buying this? I'd urge you to read at least the introduction first as you're in for a long haul (or more likely, a wasted purchase) if you cannot cope with Thompson's tiresome style.
Even worse, are the factual errors. To touch on Alan Partridge alone, no, the Christmas Special did not see Alan accidentally killing one of his guests. No, there were only two, not three series of I'm Alan Partridge. And, yes, I am sounding petty. But surely in a book citing Partridge as one of the ten best series of the decade, it's not unreasonable to expect Thompson to get his facts straight?
Despite these shortcomings, I still found this an engaging read, perhaps because I was so interested in the subject. Thompson's argument that the period covered by the book spawned a golden age of British comedy is a compelling one. The Fast Show, Father Ted, I'm Alan Partridge are all undeniably classics, even if Thompson's exclusion of Spaced from his "top ten" list seems bizarre.
Yet even this theory is undermined by Thompson's apparent conviction that Vic Reeves and Bob Mortimer are some sort of comedy geniuses. Even their mainstream flop Families At War - by any yardstick, a critical and commercial disaster - is heralded here as some sort of comedy triumph.
Events since the book's publication in 2004 have also weakened Thompson's hypothesis still further. If the golden age ended with the second series of The Office, how does Thompson explain the likes of The Thick of It, The IT Crowd and Peep Show?