Salmon is concerned about the growth of applied storytelling: storytelling used to persuade, sell, or educate. In particular, he rails against the use of stories and storytelling in business and politics, in seven chapters with titles like these:
- The New "Fiction Economy" (about manipulating workers emotionally so they can, in turn, fool customers)
- Turning Politics Into a Story (about the role of narrative in recent presidential politics in the U.S.)
- Telling War Stories (about video-game-like, immersive military training) and
- The Propaganda Empire (Karl Rove, Fox News, the internet and more.)
Salmon sees all these trends as combining to form a frightening replacement of a reality-based world with a series of "shared fictions" (p.67). His claim is that storytelling puts emotions over rational thought, elevates entertaining fiction over hard reality, and replaces political skill with "fictional competence."
But I believe that, like all tools, storytelling can be used for good or bad, to illuminate the nature of reality or to conceal it. Salmon, to be sure, puts his finger on some disturbing uses of storytelling. But he focuses blame on the tool, not on those using it or even on those of us who allow ourselves to be manipulated.
I would have loved a good book about the dangers of mis-applied storytelling. But this isn't it.
Salmon writes like a muck-raking journalist. He is good at assembling many examples of storytelling-as-deception and assembling them into an alarming montage. But he has clearly spent more time compiling examples than constructing a penetrating analysis of them - or suggesting a reasonable corrective for society.
To make things worse, his writing is frequently lacking in the logic that he glorifies. He often uses examples that don't support his conclusions. He uses emotional language in an apparent attempt to prejudice the reader against his targets. (For example, people in favor of storytelling are most often referred to as "gurus" in his book, whereas those critical of it are "researchers.")
He doesn't appear to have noticed that the emphasis during the Industrial Age on "discipline" and "rational argument" has failed to make us happy or peaceful. Most importantly, he doesn't seem to notice that storytelling's increased presence is in part a reaction to the suppression of important aspects of the human experience.
Altogether, his implied story has more in common with tabloid journalism than with reasoned analysis: "We are being manipulated by unseen forces that are taking over the world. Be afraid!"
To see Salmon's book as being about storytelling is, in spite of its title, missing the point. It's really about dangerous trends toward manipulation through narrative. If this were well-argued, it would be a valuable addition to the literature about storytelling.
Storytelling deserves better critics. I hope that the coming years produce them.