Moorcock is a major influence on most contemporary fantasy but presumably Tolkien's publicity machine is more efficient and his characters a bit more 'common-reader'-friendly! If you were bored by the Lord or just a bit disappointed or want something a tad grittier but just as intense an epic, then Stormbringer is for you. Moorcock, like Tolkien, lasts on the superiority of his language and the vitality and originality of his plotting. This fantasy was created without any influence from Tolkien but a great deal from Peake and Dunsany, both of whom preceded publication of LOTR, as well as 1930s pulp poets like Robert E. Howard and Clark Ashton Smith. What helps keep Moorcock in JRR's shade, is his temperamental disposition to use his fantasy, as Peter Ackroyd says, 'as a divining rod for the century's most urgent concerns', rather than provide comfortable escape. He never uses juvenile or animal central characters and his heroes and heroines have genuine, if rather sensational, adult relationships. What is missing in Tolkien, you'll find in Moorcock. Stormbringer, some of it written before the author's 21st birthday and the epic completed before his 23rd, is engaged with a world Tolkien could scarcely imagine, let alone tolerate and Mr Moorcock's baffled, tormented protagonist has genuine crimes and betrayals on his conscience with which we can all, to some degree, identify. This remains the best and, with Tolkien, the biggest influence on modern international fantasy. There is no ending better!
Great stuff, well worth rereading if you haven't looked at it lately. I was pleasantly impressed.