- Hardcover: 256 pages
- Publisher: OUP USA; illustrated edition edition (20 Oct 2005)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0195139445
- ISBN-13: 978-0195139440
- Product Dimensions: 23.9 x 15.5 x 2.8 cm
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,527,643 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Storm over Texas
and over 900,000 other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
..".a well-researched and well-argued treatise." --Reviews in American History
"Enlightening.... Silbey presents a lucid, fine-grained political history, complete with nuanced profiles of political leaders, that illuminates this watershed era of American history."--Publishers Weekly
"As a watershed episode in the collapse into ominous sectionalism, the politics of Texas's admission into the American Union have long demanded special attention. Fusing pacy narrative with shrewd analysis, this splendid book confirms Joel Silbey's reputation as one of the most discerning of American political historians."--Richard Carwardine, Rhodes Professor of American History, University of Oxford, author of Lincoln
"One of America's best political historians here demonstrates that Texas Annexation was one of the nation's prime turning points. Silbey's clear writing, impressive learning, and balanced judgments make this book a valuable addition to the excellent Pivotal Moments series."--Wil
Product Description
In the Spring of 1844, a fiery political conflict erupted over the admission of Texas into the Union, a hard-fought and bitter controversy that profoundly changed the course of American history. Indeed, as Joel Silbey argues in A Fierce Political Storm, the battle over Texas marked the crucial moment when partisan differences were transformed into a North-vs-South antagonism, and the momentum towards Civil War leaped into high gear. One of America's renowned political historians, Silbey offers a swiftly paced and compelling narrative of the Texas imbroglio, with an exceptional cast of characters, including John C. Calhoun, John Quincy Adams, James K. Polk, and Martin Van Buren. He shows in particular how the Van Buren bloc of the Democratic Party--the "Barnburners"--stood at the heart the annexation controversy. We see how a series of unexpected moves, some planned, some inadvertent, sparked a crisis that intensified and crystallized the North-South divide, which then became, for the first time, a driving force in national affairs. Sectionalism, Silbey shows, had often been intense, but rarely widespread and generally well contained by other forces on the political landscape. But after Texas statehood, the political landscape was transformed into one sculpted by implacable sectional differences. The bitter discord over annexation--with slavery the core issue--was the seed from which America's great crisis of union grew, leading ultimately to Southern secession and Civil War. The Texas controversy released demons that were never again pushed back into the bottle. With subtlety, great care, and much imagination, Joel Silbey shows that this brief political struggle became, in the words of an Alabama congressman, "the greatest question of the age"--indeed, a pivotal moment in American history.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
First Sentence
THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS of the United States was in its final hours in the last week of February 1845. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONGRESS of the United States was in its final hours in the last week of February 1845. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
Customer Reviews
|
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon U.K.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
3.5 out of 5 stars (8 customer reviews)
9 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Less Than Convincing, 23 Mar 2006
By H. Campbell - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Storm over Texas: The Annexation Controversy and the Road to Civil War (Pivotal Moments in American History) (Hardcover)
The author has a good writing style for history but his central thesis, that Texas' annexation was the pivotal point in the North-South separation, is undermined by his own story. Mr. Silbey points out how the Mexican WAr, Wilmot Proviso and most significantly, the Nebraska-Kansas crisis were more important steppingstones en route to disunion in 1861. True, Texas did precipitate the war with our southern neighbor, which, in turn, led to Wilmot, et al, but Silbey does not convince that these events would not have occurred otherwise. Clearly, the South's agenda to overturn the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was not going to need much of an excuse to manifest itself, Texas or no Texas. Being a Texan, I would like to think that we are responsible in a more or less indirect way for almost 50% of the present US, since the Mexican War did result in our reaching sea to sea as desired by the Manifest Destiny-ers. That case I could defend, but alas Mr. Silbey's contention vis-a-vis the Civil War would need a better attorney than either myself or evidently himself as well.
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Texas and the increase of sectional politics, 19 Feb 2006
By Bomojaz - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Storm over Texas: The Annexation Controversy and the Road to Civil War (Pivotal Moments in American History) (Hardcover)
That the annexation of Texas in 1845 was the key event leading to the Civil War is Sibley's main thesis in this book. Since 1835 when Texas first petitioned for annexation, the South had always looked eagerly at the territory as a means to expand slavery. The North recognized that point, but the consensus was that the issue was not fit for national debate. But Martin Van Buren, in 1835, even though he believed with the South that slavery was a partisan issue, sided with the North in opposing annexation. When the issue surfaced again in 1843, the debate had shifted to strictly sectional lines. Soon all issues of national debate were conducted on sectional lines. As George Pugh said in 1856, "Let us turn from the constant jealousies of the North toward the South, and the South toward the North, to proceed in that path of national achievement which now invites our care," but it was not to be. With the Wilmot Proviso of 1846, sectional debate (and animosity) on the slavery issue was heightened greatly. It seemed that what Daniel Barnard of New York had predicted in 1845 was coming true: "As certain as truth and God exist, the admission of Texas into this Union will prove, sooner or later, an element of overwhelming ruin to the Republic." Silbey's account is succinct and well-presented. Recommended.
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
The Excitement of "Pure History", 24 Aug 2005
By J.R. - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Storm over Texas: The Annexation Controversy and the Road to Civil War (Pivotal Moments in American History) (Hardcover)
When one picks up a book written by an academic historian, one must be prepared to enter a literary world in which precise and dispassionate interpretation of sources makes for an exposition that may be less captivating than more lusciously contrived popular history and historical fiction. The reward for exposure to scholarly interpretation is an opportunity to understand and test a thesis, the very process of which may provide a more usable understanding of modern political currents.
Much of Dr. Silbey's scholarship has been devoted to the rise of national political parties in the era of Van Buren. The collapse of this system and its replacement by political movements sensitive to sectional interests clearly fits the category of a "pivotal moment in American History." That the seeds of this transformation should be found in the politics surrounding the Annexation of Texas may seems strange in the context of the American History we were all taught in high school about the inevitability of our pursuit of our Manifest Destiny. Dr. Silbey opens up this debate and reminds us that the achievement of political consensus regarding major policy issues can be an unpredictable, uncontrollable and even a destructive process. An appreciation of the importance of visionary leadership and the building of consensus holds immediate lessons for us today.
Important, too, is Dr. Silbey's distinction between "partisanship" and "sectionalism" in the era before the Civil War. In our era, the "reds and blues" of the political landscape are derived from social issues which are so profound as to be said to define "two Americas". In this context it is useful to undertand the role of "partisanship" in forging political parties with broad national appeal and the price paid when broad appeal collapses in the face of highly emotionally charged social perceptions.
Dr. Silbey's book is, indeed, pure history and the excitement of a reading of his book is not so much the history he relates but, rather, the consoling sense that we have been there before and, armed with understanding, we may be able to do a better job next time.
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
