Mr Boole's "review" is a travesty, not only because of its ludicrous misrepresentation of Splendour & Squalor, which is an outstanding book, but because of its absurd and defamatory comments about Marcus Scriven, who was a contemporary of mine both during basic training in the army and at Oxford. As has been mentioned above, he wasn't in the same college as Boris Johnson - who was two years below us - didn't know him, and so didn't spend years "sucking up to him". Mr Boole, whose review might well suggest to the uninitiated that he knew Scriven at Oxford, now admits that his original "review" wrongly alleged that Scriven got a Third in History. He is equally wrong to claim that Scriven envied those "better born than him", or indeed anyone (I speak as someone who has known him for 30 years).
As far as Mr Boole's review of Splendour & Squalor is concerned, Scriven does not present a single viewpoint of each of the primary characters but pays appropriate attention to their virtues as well as their vices, and goes to extraordinary lengths to unearth the origins of those vices, whether it's a disastrous arranged marriage or an appalling upbringing - such as John Bristol experienced at the hands of his father, Victor - as has been pointed out in comments above by Simon Pott, who was Bristol's agent, and by Ian Codrington, who was solicitor to Angus Montagu, 12th Duke of Manchester.
Perhaps Mr Boole should try his hand at writing fiction; he appears to have a talent for it.