I took some convincing to get one of these things. I love books - the feel, the look, the sheer tactile pleasure of a new and unopened volume, the smell of the ink and paper, the physicality of knowing how far through the piece you are, seeing them lined up in no particular order on the bookshelves. So reading on a slick piece of Japanese technology didn't seem a great idea, even if the theory of it - potentially hundreds of books all tucked into something the size of a pamphlet - had its attractions.
But I borrowed one of these machines from a friend for the weekend, and had a go at "Great Expectations". A day and half and a third of the book later, I realised that I had discovered no great problems, had found the physical experience entirely comfortable, had enjoyed the convenience and simplicity, and really concluded that my only complaint was, well - it wasn't a book.
So I bought one.
I've downloaded a whole heap of free classic literature, all of which so far seems nicely formatted and eminently readable, and I reckon after 20-30 of those I will have written off the cost.
So what about the screen and the interface? I was very dubious about the touch screen, being concerned about the shininess (an oft aired complaint), grubby finger marks, low light performance, clarity etc. In practice, the screen is a little reflective, but in general a slight adjustment of angle - easy, because the machine is light and easily handleable - resolves the issue. It isn't a bright screen, not being backlit, and that is actually a key to it being a comfortable paper replacement. So no, you can't read with the lights out. But I can't read a book with the lights out either. I've been reading in bed entirely comfortably with a well shaded and not terribly bright lamp. If it was backlit I believe it would be unuseable, and I fully expect Apple's iPad to be an e-book disaster because of that.
Interface wise, it is a little sluggish on occasions - needing a deliberate touch or the stylus - but is simple and clear. Page turning is simple with button or gesture, and the refresh speed is very good. I read quite quickly, so I do turn pages rapidly - I would like a slightly larger reading area, even at the smallest font size - but I've had no "lag" issues or frustration. It's just like turning a paper page.
Battery life seems fine and being able to use it as a simple MP3 player will be very handy.
One of the top scoring features is the integrated dictionary: this is simply wonderful. It's a pretty good Oxford dictionary as well, coping remarkably well with Dickens, and I absolutely love the feature. You could only improve on it by loading up the Shorter Oxford really.
Overall, I'm very surprised by the quality and practicality of the PRS600. What seem like compromises are actually often typically good Sony design features, and I see myself reading a lot of classic literature this way. How much I buy is another matter, and the joy of a bookshop browse and a few unplanned purchases made of real paper and ink will never be replaced. As an adjunct to "normal" reading and as a great way to save some space and read some great works for no extra cost - it's very good indeed.
I would suggest that you should try before you buy, because it won't work for everyone, but you might be pleasantly surprised.
_____________
Supplement from extended use:
- the MP3 facility is not very good
- buying ebooks from Waterstones is clunky and irritating, particularly because there is DRM in place, but also because the prices are criminally high. It's frquently cheaper to buy the hardback version of a book rather than download the e-version. Blatant profiteering, which personally I won't be falling for. They could easily kill the market for the devices. And DRM ... has nobody taken note of what has happened in the music market? Books have always passed from hand to hand, so exactly what are they afraid of here?
Otherwise, all of my other points re the functionality of the machine still stand. Very enjoyable.