Snow Hill
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details
|
More About the Author
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 24 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Vine™ Review
(What's this?)
This book has an excellent opening, a short extract from the main character's diary: "I went to my funeral this morning. I expected more people to be there..." The remainder of the book is narrated in the third person and I am sorry to say that I found it dull, badly written and a real struggle to get through. I don't like writing critical reviews but the deal with Vine is that if you request something you have an obligation to review it, so...
It's a good idea for a story: set in 1936 it features a young reporter looking into murder and its connections to police corruption and homosexuality (illegal then, of course). The trouble is that it is so badly told. For example, at the outset we are clumsily introduced to a cast of deeply unconvincing, stereotypical characters: the boozy journalist, the bullying boss, the troubled PC with a heart of gold, and so on. One is a posh bloke who is a rival reporter to the main protagonist who "tosses his flowing, chestnut locks." Lazy cliché mars the whole book - later someone is actually dragged somewhere "kicking and screaming" - and the prose is dreadfully clunky and downright inappropriate in places. There are irrelevant and tedious reminiscences about childhood scenes which add nothing and slow down an already sluggish narrative, apparently inserted to show how much research the author has done.
Characters do implausible things for the flimsiest of reasons, often putting themselves in danger for the sole purpose of setting up a predictable "tense" situation. For example, the protagonist goes to meet his only informant in a dodgy alley at 3.30am. No-one is in the alley when he gets there, but he spots a large, deserted cold-store building with its doors closed but unlocked. He knows people want to silence him, and anyone with a grain of sense would get away from there as fast as possible. I wouldn't dream of giving away plot details, but you may find yourself able to guess what he actually does, what he finds and what happens to him after he's found it.
I could go on, but I'm sure you get my drift. I didn't like the book at all and often found myself muttering "oh, for heaven's sake" out of sheer irritation. Other reviewers have clearly enjoyed this book and you should read their reviews before being put off by mine - tastes vary, after all. Apparently it's the first of a trilogy but I certainly shan't be bothering with the next two.
It's a good idea for a story: set in 1936 it features a young reporter looking into murder and its connections to police corruption and homosexuality (illegal then, of course). The trouble is that it is so badly told. For example, at the outset we are clumsily introduced to a cast of deeply unconvincing, stereotypical characters: the boozy journalist, the bullying boss, the troubled PC with a heart of gold, and so on. One is a posh bloke who is a rival reporter to the main protagonist who "tosses his flowing, chestnut locks." Lazy cliché mars the whole book - later someone is actually dragged somewhere "kicking and screaming" - and the prose is dreadfully clunky and downright inappropriate in places. There are irrelevant and tedious reminiscences about childhood scenes which add nothing and slow down an already sluggish narrative, apparently inserted to show how much research the author has done.
Characters do implausible things for the flimsiest of reasons, often putting themselves in danger for the sole purpose of setting up a predictable "tense" situation. For example, the protagonist goes to meet his only informant in a dodgy alley at 3.30am. No-one is in the alley when he gets there, but he spots a large, deserted cold-store building with its doors closed but unlocked. He knows people want to silence him, and anyone with a grain of sense would get away from there as fast as possible. I wouldn't dream of giving away plot details, but you may find yourself able to guess what he actually does, what he finds and what happens to him after he's found it.
I could go on, but I'm sure you get my drift. I didn't like the book at all and often found myself muttering "oh, for heaven's sake" out of sheer irritation. Other reviewers have clearly enjoyed this book and you should read their reviews before being put off by mine - tastes vary, after all. Apparently it's the first of a trilogy but I certainly shan't be bothering with the next two.
14 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Bought this book on the back of a good review in the Daily Telegraph: what a disappointment. "Snow Hill" features one-dimensional characters you can't engage with, woefully anachronistic and hysterically inept dialogue, and a clunky murder mystery that even Scooby and Shaggy would have made light work of solving. A monkey could write a better thriller - in its lunch hour.
Format:Paperback|Amazon Vine™ Review
(What's this?)
Set in the London underworld of 1936, Fleet Street reporter Johnny Steadman is tipped-off about a Snow Hill policeman's death. When he asks questions at the station, he's met with a blank wall of silence. Shortly afterwards, in search of a lead, he encounters a man's bloody death at close hand - but still persists in asking questions, discovering police corruption lies at the core. To unmask the killer he ends up having to go undercover as a dead man...
This is the debut novel (but not debut book) by Telegraph and Evening Standard journalist, and Seven magazine fiction reviewer, Mark Sanderson.
The novel garnered good reviews in certain areas of the press - including the Daily Telegraph (hmmm) - and plaudits from the likes of Melvyn Bragg and Jake Arnott. But here's the dichotomy: many reviewers on Amazon don't rate it at all, and the people who buy the books are the most important audience of all.
I fall somewhere in the middle of the two camps. `Snow Hill' has its good points: the author does inject a level of dark atmosphere and period feel, putting excellent research to good use, but he sometimes overplays his hand at this, slowing down the narrative - not an especially prudent thing to do in a crime thriller. In addition to the occasionally plodding pace, it's packed with clichés, some stereotypical characters, and Sanderson sometimes strives too hard for literary effect and, for me, fails.
I don't wish to be too harsh on the guy because the story is good, but as a journalist and book critic he's discovered how hard it is to make all the important elements of a novel - plot, characterisation, narrative tug, prose, etc. coalesce into a satisfying whole.
The first part of a projected trilogy, I came away from the book disappointed because thirties London is such an interesting, noir-ish era in which to set crime fiction. I know how hard it is to produce publishable material so, I won't be giving up on Mr Sanderson just yet. I'll look-up book two when I get the time and I'm sure he'll have learned hard lessons from the mixed response to `Snow Hill'.
This is the debut novel (but not debut book) by Telegraph and Evening Standard journalist, and Seven magazine fiction reviewer, Mark Sanderson.
The novel garnered good reviews in certain areas of the press - including the Daily Telegraph (hmmm) - and plaudits from the likes of Melvyn Bragg and Jake Arnott. But here's the dichotomy: many reviewers on Amazon don't rate it at all, and the people who buy the books are the most important audience of all.
I fall somewhere in the middle of the two camps. `Snow Hill' has its good points: the author does inject a level of dark atmosphere and period feel, putting excellent research to good use, but he sometimes overplays his hand at this, slowing down the narrative - not an especially prudent thing to do in a crime thriller. In addition to the occasionally plodding pace, it's packed with clichés, some stereotypical characters, and Sanderson sometimes strives too hard for literary effect and, for me, fails.
I don't wish to be too harsh on the guy because the story is good, but as a journalist and book critic he's discovered how hard it is to make all the important elements of a novel - plot, characterisation, narrative tug, prose, etc. coalesce into a satisfying whole.
The first part of a projected trilogy, I came away from the book disappointed because thirties London is such an interesting, noir-ish era in which to set crime fiction. I know how hard it is to produce publishable material so, I won't be giving up on Mr Sanderson just yet. I'll look-up book two when I get the time and I'm sure he'll have learned hard lessons from the mixed response to `Snow Hill'.
Most Recent Customer Reviews
In a way, hilarious !
The plot idea for this book is compelling , the opening few sentences are gripping and the cover is nice.
Unfortunately, that's where the positives end. Read more
Unfortunately, that's where the positives end. Read more
Published 8 months ago by bingomatic
Good start ...
You will know, probably, that this book has a cracking start, expressed in the first person and promising a good story. Read more
Published 12 months ago by S. Hill
Absolutely Brilliant
Utterly brilliant!
The best thriller I've read for years. I was gripped right from the opening sentence and I just couldn't put it down. Read more
The best thriller I've read for years. I was gripped right from the opening sentence and I just couldn't put it down. Read more
Published 13 months ago by CocoRobot
Any novel that opens with ...
"I went to my funeral this morning. I expected more people to be there"
Just begs to be read! Read more
Just begs to be read! Read more
Published 14 months ago by Karen Baxter
Snow Hill plodder
In the acknowledgments the author thanks his editors and states that Snow Hill would have been a very different book without them. Read more
Published 15 months ago by Ardquin
Worth buying but flawed
This should be a very good book. It recreates a fascinating era in which gay men were persecuted but in which London had a vibrant gay scene. Read more
Published 17 months ago by Mark
Atmospheric and entertaining
I am most surpised that this book has received so many negative reviews. Perhaps if it was hyped in the press this may have lead to disappointment upon reading, but I hadn't read... Read more
Published 18 months ago by Sue at home
Not bad, not excellent
When I saw the synopsis of this book, I was really keen to get into it and read it. Mark Sanderson has written a pretty good mystery but for me there was something lacking. Read more
Published 20 months ago by Stracs
Don't be too long with the next one!
After the first couple of pages I was hooked! Couldn't put it down - a real page turner. Mr Sanderson conjures up true tangible atmosphere, allowing the reader to voyeuristically... Read more
Published 22 months ago by Youchew
It's shockingly bad...
The story here is a pile of stereotypes and cliches. It seems to have been written with the express view of the homophobe. Read more
Published on 28 May 2010 by TeamScoop
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
