|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Very disappointing,
By
This review is from: Snow Hill (Paperback)
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Programme (What's this?)
This book has an excellent opening, a short extract from the main character's diary: "I went to my funeral this morning. I expected more people to be there..." The remainder of the book is narrated in the third person and I am sorry to say that I found it dull, badly written and a real struggle to get through. I don't like writing critical reviews but the deal with Vine is that if you request something you have an obligation to review it, so...
It's a good idea for a story: set in 1936 it features a young reporter looking into murder and its connections to police corruption and homosexuality (illegal then, of course). The trouble is that it is so badly told. For example, at the outset we are clumsily introduced to a cast of deeply unconvincing, stereotypical characters: the boozy journalist, the bullying boss, the troubled PC with a heart of gold, and so on. One is a posh bloke who is a rival reporter to the main protagonist who "tosses his flowing, chestnut locks." Lazy cliché mars the whole book - later someone is actually dragged somewhere "kicking and screaming" - and the prose is dreadfully clunky and downright inappropriate in places. There are irrelevant and tedious reminiscences about childhood scenes which add nothing and slow down an already sluggish narrative, apparently inserted to show how much research the author has done. Characters do implausible things for the flimsiest of reasons, often putting themselves in danger for the sole purpose of setting up a predictable "tense" situation. For example, the protagonist goes to meet his only informant in a dodgy alley at 3.30am. No-one is in the alley when he gets there, but he spots a large, deserted cold-store building with its doors closed but unlocked. He knows people want to silence him, and anyone with a grain of sense would get away from there as fast as possible. I wouldn't dream of giving away plot details, but you may find yourself able to guess what he actually does, what he finds and what happens to him after he's found it. I could go on, but I'm sure you get my drift. I didn't like the book at all and often found myself muttering "oh, for heaven's sake" out of sheer irritation. Other reviewers have clearly enjoyed this book and you should read their reviews before being put off by mine - tastes vary, after all. Apparently it's the first of a trilogy but I certainly shan't be bothering with the next two.
14 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Snore Hill,
By
This review is from: Snow Hill (Paperback)
Bought this book on the back of a good review in the Daily Telegraph: what a disappointment. "Snow Hill" features one-dimensional characters you can't engage with, woefully anachronistic and hysterically inept dialogue, and a clunky murder mystery that even Scooby and Shaggy would have made light work of solving. A monkey could write a better thriller - in its lunch hour.
2.0 out of 5 stars
Clumsy clunker. Avoid,
By
This review is from: Snow Hill (Paperback)
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Programme (What's this?)
The blurb for Snow Hill promises much, and it gets off to a decent start, but heads rapidly down hill. Very basic writing, flimsy plot, ghastly moments of anachronistic language for a novel which is set in the 1930s.
I expected to love this, because for many years I lived in London's East End and worked in the Smithfield area which is where all the action takes place. But this is a very unrewarding read, full of lame cliche (the main character is 'fiercely ambitious' and that's just the tip of the... you know) and preposterous exposition. (By which I mean the main characters talk their way through the plot turns in order to explain their increasingly idiotic behaviour. It doesn't make sense when they do it, and it certainly doesn't make sense when they ramble on about it for half a chapter afterwards). The characters are poorly drawn and nearly interchangable; the sterotyping of the undertrod working-class lad making himself good and the overbearing upper-class nob having the upper hand is hackneyed (good pun, eh?) beyond belief. Then, just when you've been bored half to death and can't face really continuing, the action descends into a soft porn, boy-on-boy bondage scene. I almost wondered if that segment of the book was there to wake up those readers who'd dozed off. Sorry. Never going to read another book by this author again. It's not-quite-dreadful, which is why it gets two stars (I have read far worse). But I can't recommend it. 3/10
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|
|