I use quite a lot of the Barrington Stoke books with the kids I teach (mostly 14 to 16 year olds, not confident readers, often quite seriously streetwise), and while this book's by no means a bad read (and while I really like Robert Swindells' work), it's just not as good as it *could* be. For a start, the plot seems to lack a lot of the interesting ethical questions posed by other books in the series (it's basically: Boy witnesses crime, takes pictures, is tracked down by one of the criminals and - after a couple of twists and turns - is rewarded by the police for his good work). Secondly, it has a rather unconvincing and unexpected plot twist that takes up two chapters of explanation at the end of the book, but delivers very little in terms of reader interest or action. And thirdly... it's just very, very oddly written. While it's obvious that books aimed at this readership can't be laden with high-octane swearing, this one just seems weirdly old-fashioned in its language... halfway between 'Brighton Rock' and a very early episode of 'Grange Hill'. I know that fashions in language change all the time, but being so far from the mark with street talk in a book aimed at Snapshot's readership seems like a lapse in editorial rigour.