I have a great deal of respect for Matt Rendell as a journalist, but his writing in "A Significant Other" disappointed me.
The book lurches rather awkwardly between Victor Hugo Pena's account of the 2003 Tour to Rendell's wider recount of the Tour history and his other 'on-the-front-line' observations. It's an appealing concept that's badly delivered. There is no flow, and so one section never fits smoothly with the other. Equally, as other reviewers have commented, Rendell also seems to enjoy making his sentences, or indeed whole paragraphs, painfully convoluted. It's disappointing so many of the points that he makes feel unnecessarily complicated.
He acknowledges pro cycling is, in many ways, not the most straightforward sport to follow and understand, but people curious to learn more about it would, I suspect, be completely baffled by this book!
Overall, it makes for a rather unsatisfying read - which is a shame, as his passion for the subject (if you listen to his realpeleton podcast) is quite infectious.