I was bought this by a relative, who said it was brilliant. In my opinion, it isn't. Firstly, the subject of the book is still only a child, and really should not be intruded upon by the press anymore than she already has been. Secondly, it is sensationalist throughout: 'Britain's cruellest mother' being one of the very first phrases in the book. Really? Worse than Baby P's mother? Are we recounting facts, or using hyperbole to create even more anguish and drama? Thirdly, pretty much everything the author writes is regurgitated from info already in the public domain, ie from widely circulated news stories. Nothing much new here. And fourthly, the author adopts a superior Daily Mail-esque tone of outrage thoughout, yet is not above profiting from retelling the harrowing tale of a very dysfunctional family. Worse still, the book is not narrated by the person who actually went through this experience (like 3096 Days, for example), nor has it been written a respectful number of years after the deaths of all those involved. Oh no- this book is about a family which still is alive, and a child who I reckon we can safely assume is not yet over her ordeal. It smacks of the most hideous kind of intrusive, greedy journalism: you know, the kind of hack that takes photos of grieving people or camps outside the doorsteps of the bereaved. Horrible stuff.