Don't be fooled or put off by this excellent volumes' small size!
Having disposed of the current mass resistance to psychoanalysis, one can be ready for the works of Karen Horney. She is, after all, what all our current 'popular' psych. writers have cut their teeth on, a good part of the time. Her dissociation from some dimensions of Freud notwithstanding, many will find all her books very useful. I have re-read them all several times, and currently am working with SELF-ANALYSIS. It is full of useful accounts ('case history' material) that are quite useful, and deserving of many re-readings.
It also has a generous supply of necessary aphorisms for analysis, blended with the text. One could make a list of them. I bet such a list would constitute a useful outline for study of her book.
Yes, the SELF-ANALYSIS volume can be opaque in many respects, at first. It does require re-readings, at least for the beginner. It is, however, an excellent hook to hang your analytical hat from. Once determined to get from psychology in general, and the works of Karen Horney specifically, all they are worth, this book will become a standby for overcoming mental obstacles to sanity and health. Nobody can walk away from a thorough and honest assimilation of Karen Horney's books without a richer, sunnier, more positive and optimistic outlook on human psychology and life. This is entirely apart from the basic foundation/springboard one can get from Karen Horney for further psychotherapeutic reading and study.
Although written years ago, Karen Horney's books lack the shrillness and lesser professionalism of many popular psychology writers. At the same time, she makes many basic truths and understandings of psychology practical, workable. This is an advantage over more advanced writers in psychoanalysis. You can get alot out of reading Karen Horney without wading through the greater complexities of, say, Otto Fenichel, Edward Kempf, Edward Bleuler, and other writers on psychoanalysis, who may intimidate new readers by an apparent initial lack of explication. (You can turn to such writers later. And I would highly recommend the three I have here mentioned. Horney's list she includes in the first few sectons seems a mite incomplete. )
Whatever her flaws, she communicates much of the stability and sobriety with regards to psychology, and life itself, that Clara M. Thompson does ('Interpersonal Psychoanalysis', Basic Books.) Our popular psych. writers to the contrary, it is pleasurable to learn psychology as something besides a circus, or perhaps a superficial ego-gratificaton festival.
(Worthy introductions of a classical type abound. Anna Freud's 'The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense' is one of the best, short, concise, sane introductions to any personal psychology studies whatsoever. Her fathers' 'Interp. of Dreams' may be gleaned to advantage, yet may take awhile to assimilate in its largesse: I would suggest, by and large, going for his ' Psychopathology of Everyday Life,' a briefer text, for your beginning readings of psychoanalysis. Eventually you will add the rest of Freud, and others.
Might I also suggest that you add to Karen Horney, Theodore Reik's 'Listening with the Third Ear,' Jung's 'Two Essays on Analytical Psychology,' and ' Man and His Symbols,' Fenichel's 'Psa. theory of the Neuroses,' Eduard Bleuler's ' Demenetia Praexox, the Group of Scizophrenias,' Helene Deutsch's two-vol 'Psychology of Women,' and Franz Alexander's 'Psychosomatic Medicine,' to your basic psychology studies ? - readings like these can 'walk you over' to the saner side of psychology. Even such as Georg Groddeck's 'Book of the It,' in spite of the eccentricity of both author and text, could prove quite useful and enlightening. Brenner's plodding intro, 'An Elementary Textbk. of Psychoanalysis,' revised since the 1950s, also may prove useful to many.
It is advised that, thru all this democratic selection of readings, chosen despite greater and lesser difficulties and vagaries, one should avoid becoming dogmatic, and focus instead on comparing and contrasting ideas, for a long time. This is essential for objectivity and proper application. It is a discreet, non-fanatical, commonsense, yet pleasurable and confident overall reinforcement of your observational skills, that you should want to acquire. ' All things in moderation!' and 'Fanaticism is above all to be eschewed.' If this sounds like learning about life, so it is: psych. is rather like that.
To swallow mamy of these texts whole, without forethought and discrimination, would be a mistake. without a thoughtful maintenance of distance from them before making them part and parcel of one's overall inegrated understanding, is essential if one is to study and understand them. )
Horney offers a useful recommended reading list in the first part of SELF-ANALYSIS for the beginner.
Yet all of Karen Horney's books themselves should be read by those interested in understanding self and others. They make the reader take that undogmatic 'one step back fom life,' so necessary for an understanding of psychology, that allows one to access necessary objectivity and calm towards life and self.
I always recommend Karen Horney as a 'sin qua non,' even for more advanced readers in the realm of psychology. Her general appeal, as well as her sober, non-flashy approach, is also useful for those who wish to apply preventatives against potential mental illness problems arising in their own lives, for now and the future.
I might, however, recommend getting Karen Horney's other books first, and reading those before concentrating on the SELF-ANALYSIS volume. In truth, all of Karen Horney's books deserve a place on anyone's health bookshelf. You won't be making a mistake by putting them there.
(as an aside: what we need is a one-volume edition of a half-dozen of her earlier volumes, for convenience, and to alert readers more immediately and thoroughly to the fact that she wrote more than one or two books.)
To put it simply, Karen Horney has yet to be replaced, either as a psychology writer, or as a general necessity.