I picked up "Seduction Theory" down at the Blue Pear book store on Attalee Street. The summary compared the author to Salinger and promissed the reader an interesting view of New York through the eyes of a struggling college graduate.
Right away, this raised two red flags for me. Whenever a new author is compared to a previous one, the connection is almost always languid or non-existant. But more importantly, who wants to see anything through the eyes of a college graduate?
But I read on hoping to be pleasantly suprised. The book was not good and it was not bad. The prose was vapid to be certain, but was still a few levels above excerable. Poe once remarked that the only successful criminals are the gifted or the insane. I'm afraid the same is true of artists, and particularly so of authors. Unfortunately, the content and Style of Herr Beller's work is meaningless.
When Pushkin first published Eugene Onegin, his readers complained that it was bland and pointless. But soon even the most severe critics admitted that they saw a little bit of Onegin in everyone. Eugene Onegin was supposed to be dull. He represented a personality that was typical of late Imperial Russian society. But Pushkin was a genious and Beller is Beller.
I think his book was published because it attempts to stamp New York on every page. Beller gave his purile prose a geographic identity and his publisher thought it might go somewhere. Ah well...