Mike King is Reader at London Metropolitan University as well as a Director for the Scientific and Medical Network, an organization dedicated to combating scientific materialism. He also, I understand, sits on the Steering Group for the Wrekin Trust Forum, which promotes spiritual learning on all levels. His new book, Secularism: The Hidden Origins of Disbelief, throws a long awaited new light into our recent literary squabbles about atheism, God, religion, etc.
On the writing of books dealing with religion, spirituality, and secularism there seems no end. King, however, presents us with a whole new multidimensional picture. For most of us, modern secularism rose out of the contingencies of the Enlightenment. King, however, argues that, with rare exception, the Enlightenment thinkers were not atheists and had no intention of eliminating religion but rather of improving it. He argues that the rise of an Eastern style, non-devotional impulse at that time was not accepted but did indeed encouraged the expression of what might be called Atheism.
King's perspective is a new and, to my knowledge, a unique one. He guides us through a broad range of thinkers, from Pythagoras to Freud, interweaving and incorporating the thought and perspectives of a variety of Eastern writers and thinkers.
His elucidation of the Eastern concepts of "bhakti" and "jnani" will be new to many readers and the use of these concepts (as well as "via negativa" and "via positiva") are vital giving us new perspectives on the historical development of "Western" religion, and of religion and spirituality in general.
I read this book with ever growing interest and at the end felt that King's planned next volume on this subject will be well worth the waiting. In fact I recently referred to it as "an intellectual cliff hanger" to a friend.
My only complaint about the book is an editorial one. To my mind, the "lead" time" to the true thesis of the book was a bit long and contained sections which contributed nothing to the main argument. This may be my personal taste, however, and the wait for the "real stuff" was well worth it.