Historical criticism. Form criticism. Feminist criticism. If you're starting on serious theological study, you've probably heard of them, even if it's not always easy to grasp them or distinguish some of them from each other. This excellent introduction, describing twenty-three different approaches to interpreting the New Testament (in less than ten pages each) will demystify them for you - I think it's quite simply the clearest and most accessible way into the subject there is. Each chapter starts with a review of the topic from a leading scholar (Bruce Malina on social science criticism, Mark Goodacre on redaction criticism, for example), with a brief bibliography of `essential further reading'. Then follows a worked example, in which Gooder applies the interpretive technique in question to a particular NT text.
These examples, for me, were the highlight: loads of new insights on familiar passages from new and unfamiliar angles, the best being a description of Elsa Tamez's analysis of the problems caused by (she argues) rich women in 1 Timothy 2 from a socio-political criticism standpoint; and of Musa Dube's postcolonial criticism perspective on Matthew's Gospel as a sort of apology for Roman imperialism. But it's invidious to select just two, because there are many other fascinating and thought-provoking examples. Gooder's positive evaluation of each interpretive lens concludes the chapters, and although here one feels she could occasionally have been more robust in critiquing the shortcomings of some methodologies, the reader is left with a clear sense of the value of the approach described. Very good indeed.