- Hardcover: 150 pages
- Publisher: Chapman and Hall (May 1978)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0412154404
- ISBN-13: 978-0412154409
- Product Dimensions: 23.9 x 16.5 x 2.7 cm
- Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 2,898,469 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
Scientists Must Write
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
'I recommend this book to all scientists - students of experienced workers - it will encourage them to write and write well.' -Chemistry in Britain (praise for the 1st edition)
--This text refers to the
Paperback
edition.
Product Description
Good writing and communication skills are essential in many areas of science and engineering, to help observation, thinking and remembering, to organize work and to avoid stress. Written by a scientist for scientists, this book is much more than a textbook of English grammar – it is a valuable source of information for all aspects of writing in scientific and technical situations.
The only book focusing on the ways in which writing is important to the scientific community, this book assists readers on:
* how to write and choice of words
* using numbers and illustrations
* writing project reports, theses and papers for publication
* giving a short talk or presentation.
The new edition of Scientists Must Write has been fully revised and updated to take account of the changes in information and communications technology including word processing and information storage and retrieval; new appendices on punctuation, spelling and computers; and useful exercises to improve writing.
This popular guide will be of great use to undergraduates, postgraduates, professional scientists and engineers.
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
When asked why we must write, most scientists and engineers think first of the need to communicate. Read the first page
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
When asked why we must write, most scientists and engineers think first of the need to communicate. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
Format:Paperback
Am doing Open University science and environmental courses so having to study and write essays (which I haven't done for over 40 years) was a shock to the system!! Needed a book to help me and found this one to be full of helpful hints and information. Good price too so well worth the money. Highly recommend.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
4 reviews
18 of 20 people found the following review helpful
Who was the audience?
14 Aug 2005
Format:Paperback
I can not recommend this book.
I wanted to like it. I write, a lot, about technical topics, and am convinced that proper training improve my writing. A few pages in, I found so many errors, both minor and major, that I lost the hope this book would help.
Minor things included the author's micro-management of whether dates in business letters should be punctuated. (Yes or no, can you guess what he requires? Does it matter?) Another minor point was insistence that a certain line in a business memo be underlined. Underlining was never a great way to emphasize text, and has gotten worse since the 1970s writing of the first edition. Underlining has come to mean "link" in the Web era, and it's safe to assume that most memoranda will be viewed electronically. Underlined but unclickable text causes confusion, and causes more confusion if a paper document is ever fed to an OCR scanner. Text recognition is dicey at best, and adding junk to the letterforms can never help.
The major problems include notebooks, resumes, and basic English usage. Scientific and engineering notebooks can sometimes approach the status of legal documents. Proper notes can establish primacy of discovery, and can affect the validity of valuable patents. The best notebooks are permanently bound with printed page numbers, giving some assurance that pages weren't added or removed at some later date. Many engineers also favor grid-ruled pages, for aligning text, as 'training wheels' for uncertain sketching skills, and as aids in tables and graphs. Barrass recommends a combination of lined and unlined pages, interleaved from different sources. I'm glad he discusses professional note-taking at all, but I'm disappointed by the discussion.
Ditto examples. It's great that he presented real text from real publications for critique, and that he stresses the importance of critique. He is simply wrong, however, in asserting (p.36) that "[change] unequalled in magnitude MEANS unequalled." Changes may differ in magnitude, in speed, in visibility, and in as many more dimensions as a creative reader can imagine. I agree that the phrase may be ungainly, and may not be appropriate to the rest of the cited text. Still, it is worthwhile for the writer to point out which aspect of change is under discussion, an idea that Barrass denies.
His suggested resume (p.28) addresses only the needs of a high-schooler (is this the scientist who must write?), and addresses those badly. It really is as grim as you may imagine. The suggested cover letter (p.27) would be pathetic even for a high-schooler. It never even mentions the job's content, let alone the reason that the applicant feels qualified to apply for the job.
I admit, I made it only 36 pages into the 190+ of this book. In those first four chapters, however, I found so much bad advice that I simply could not believe the rest of the book would repay the time spent in reading it. Perhaps the next 150+ pages were filled with wisdom, but my budget of trust for this author is bankrupt. I leave it to the next reviewer to describe the good in this book.
//wiredweird
I wanted to like it. I write, a lot, about technical topics, and am convinced that proper training improve my writing. A few pages in, I found so many errors, both minor and major, that I lost the hope this book would help.
Minor things included the author's micro-management of whether dates in business letters should be punctuated. (Yes or no, can you guess what he requires? Does it matter?) Another minor point was insistence that a certain line in a business memo be underlined. Underlining was never a great way to emphasize text, and has gotten worse since the 1970s writing of the first edition. Underlining has come to mean "link" in the Web era, and it's safe to assume that most memoranda will be viewed electronically. Underlined but unclickable text causes confusion, and causes more confusion if a paper document is ever fed to an OCR scanner. Text recognition is dicey at best, and adding junk to the letterforms can never help.
The major problems include notebooks, resumes, and basic English usage. Scientific and engineering notebooks can sometimes approach the status of legal documents. Proper notes can establish primacy of discovery, and can affect the validity of valuable patents. The best notebooks are permanently bound with printed page numbers, giving some assurance that pages weren't added or removed at some later date. Many engineers also favor grid-ruled pages, for aligning text, as 'training wheels' for uncertain sketching skills, and as aids in tables and graphs. Barrass recommends a combination of lined and unlined pages, interleaved from different sources. I'm glad he discusses professional note-taking at all, but I'm disappointed by the discussion.
Ditto examples. It's great that he presented real text from real publications for critique, and that he stresses the importance of critique. He is simply wrong, however, in asserting (p.36) that "[change] unequalled in magnitude MEANS unequalled." Changes may differ in magnitude, in speed, in visibility, and in as many more dimensions as a creative reader can imagine. I agree that the phrase may be ungainly, and may not be appropriate to the rest of the cited text. Still, it is worthwhile for the writer to point out which aspect of change is under discussion, an idea that Barrass denies.
His suggested resume (p.28) addresses only the needs of a high-schooler (is this the scientist who must write?), and addresses those badly. It really is as grim as you may imagine. The suggested cover letter (p.27) would be pathetic even for a high-schooler. It never even mentions the job's content, let alone the reason that the applicant feels qualified to apply for the job.
I admit, I made it only 36 pages into the 190+ of this book. In those first four chapters, however, I found so much bad advice that I simply could not believe the rest of the book would repay the time spent in reading it. Perhaps the next 150+ pages were filled with wisdom, but my budget of trust for this author is bankrupt. I leave it to the next reviewer to describe the good in this book.
//wiredweird
Should be required reading of graduating seniors in math and computer science
26 Feb 2011
Format:Paperback
People in all areas of science, mathematics and technology must be able to write clearly, concisely and accurately. While in most cases, a failure to do so leads to a bit of confusion and a correction being published, in a few cases the failure to communicate clearly can be mission critical or life threatening. In this book, Barrass dispenses some excellent advice regarding how to execute technical communication; I compare it favorably to the classic, "The Elements of Style" by Strunk and White. Effective written and oral delivery of technical information are both covered.
Reading this book should be a mandatory requirement for all graduating seniors in computer science and mathematics. One of the most common criticisms of recent graduates in computer science that businesses state is an inability of those graduates to communicate effectively in both oral and written form. A careful reading in combination to some practice will have a very positive affect on the impression that the graduate will make on potential employers. Finally, even longtime professionals will find that reading this book will lead to an improvement in their communication skills.
Published in Journal of Recreational Mathematics, reprinted with permission
Reading this book should be a mandatory requirement for all graduating seniors in computer science and mathematics. One of the most common criticisms of recent graduates in computer science that businesses state is an inability of those graduates to communicate effectively in both oral and written form. A careful reading in combination to some practice will have a very positive affect on the impression that the graduate will make on potential employers. Finally, even longtime professionals will find that reading this book will lead to an improvement in their communication skills.
Published in Journal of Recreational Mathematics, reprinted with permission
Good reference
24 Nov 2009
Amazon Verified Purchase
This book offers a good reference for scientific writing. Even though it is outdated the writing style of scientific journals is great. The book in written in English (GB) so there are a few words and phrases that may need some getting used to.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
