4.0 out of 5 stars
The Convergence of Fantasy and Real Science, 28 May 2009
By Max Blackston - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: The Science of Middle Earth (Paperback)
The thing about Henry Gee is that he is a real scientist - not a populizer, not a science journalist - and he loves J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle Earth. This book is a delight (for all Tolkien fans) both for its insights into Tolkien and the "origins" of Middle Earth, as well as for the scientific explanations.
Gee takes a many of features of Middle Earth - its denizens, its topography and its "technology" - and attempts explanations of the science possibly underlying them. In doing, so he is both faithful to the science that he represents and respectful of Tolkien's conception of Middle Earth. When he cannot explain something - as with the "one ring" - he neither dismisses it as fantasy nor attempts a fictional way out; he simply admits that we do not yet know enough. In this way, he expounds on how Orcs came into being, the problem of the wings of the Balrogs, the acute sight and longevity of the Elves, how Frodo's Mithril undershirt might have saved him from the troll's spear, and many other Middle Earth topics.
In one memorable chapter, he identifies the theme of loss or diminution that pervades the Rings trilogy - loss of powers, reduction of peoples, lost skills - and relates this to both Tolkien's personal and professional life, as a scholar of the "ancient, lost tongues of the north..his need for restitution was so great that he was driven.. to create new, lost languages.. and.. to invent a culture and mythology to go with them."
Like all students of Middle Earth, Gee knows in his heart that, somewhere, somewhen , it really existed. This knowledge must be the motivation for his final chapter, in which he takes to task those who, like Richard Dawkins, "know" things so absolutely, that they simply cannot bear anyone else having different views of the world and of reality. How refreshing to hear another scientist try to knock that arrogant professor of "the public understanding of science" off his bully pulpit. It is surely no coincidence that the highlighted "blurb" on the rear of this book is a quote from Simon Conway Morris, professor of evolutionary paleobiology at Cambrige University. Conway Morris - less of a populizer than Dawkins and more of a real researcher - admiringly refers to how Henry Gee "..explores how the marvellous remains marvellous, but not fantastic.. ".
From now on, I will want to know every scientist's Middle Earth credentials before taking them seriously.