Science and Creation: The Search for Understanding and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
  • RRP: £9.87
  • You Save: £0.17 (2%)
FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over £10.
Only 4 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Science and Creation: The... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Expedited shipping available on this book. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged.
Trade in your item
Get a £1.54
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Science and Creation: The Search for Understanding Paperback – 30 Jan 2007


See all 6 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Paperback
"Please retry"
£9.70
£7.43 £6.40
£9.70 FREE Delivery in the UK on orders over £10. Only 4 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Frequently Bought Together

Science and Creation: The Search for Understanding + Evil and the God of Love + Utilitarianism
Price For All Three: £33.19

Buy the selected items together


Trade In this Item for up to £1.54
Trade in Science and Creation: The Search for Understanding for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £1.54, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Paperback: 152 pages
  • Publisher: Templeton Foundation Press,U.S.; New edition edition (30 Jan. 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1599471000
  • ISBN-13: 978-1599471006
  • Product Dimensions: 14 x 1.5 x 21.6 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 505,741 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Synopsis

John C. Polkinghorne, internationally renowned priest-scientist, addresses fundamental questions about how scientific and theological worldviews relate to each other in this, the second volume (originally published in 1988) of his trilogy, which, also, included "Science and Providence" and "One World". Dr. Polkinghorne illustrates how a scientifically minded person approaches the task of theological inquiry, postulating that there exists a close analogy between theory and experiment in science and belief and understanding in theology. He offers a fresh perspective on such questions as: Are we witnessing today a revival a natural theology - the search for God through the exercise of reason and the study of nature? How do the insights of modern physics into the interlacing of order and disorder relate to the Christian doctrine of Creation? What is the relationship between mind and matter? Polkinghorne states that the "Remarkable insights that science affords us into the intelligible workings of the world cry out for an explanation more profound than that which it itself can provide.

Religion, if it is to take seriously its claim that the world is the creation of God, must be humble enough to learn from science what that world is actually like. The dialogue between them can only be mutually enriching." This work was originally published by SPCK.


Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
5 star
0
4 star
2
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful By Dr. H. A. Jones TOP 500 REVIEWER on 19 Jun. 2010
Format: Paperback
Science and Creation: The search for understanding, by John Polkinghorne, SPCK, 1988, 128 ff.

The compatibility of science and religion, 2
By Howard Jones

This volume, the second of a trilogy, begins where its predecessor, One World, left off - with natural theology. The author was formerly a professor of theoretical physics at Cambridge University but, since 1982, has been an Anglican priest. John Polkinghorne, KBE, FRS, admits quite honestly `I certainly cannot pretend to write as a professional theologian, but only as a scientist deeply interested in the understanding of religion.' As a scientist of considerably lower stature myself but also with an interest and some training in philosophy, to this extent I share a background with the author. The author says that `Theology cannot just be left to the theologians' because too often they ignore totally the findings of science and write as if their scriptures presented truth about the natural world. The remainder of this short book suggests how science can be used to provide evidence for the existence of the God of western religion.

Chapter 2, Insightful Inquiry, suggests how science and theology share the common objective
of gaining `a coherent and satisfying understanding of the world in which we live.' Polkinghorne suggests that the anthropic principle, as well as the fortuitous values of the natural constants in the universe pointed out by Paul Davies, form part of the evidence of a beneficent God. Chapter 3 on Order and Disorder expands on this theme.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Mr. D. P. Jay on 18 Nov. 2013
Format: Paperback
John Polkinghorne was (and is) a top physicist and he was ordained midlife and served a curacy in this city.

Although he is very orthodox, he isn't fundamentalist when it comes to creation, seven days and all that.

Just as Islam teaches that Allah reveals himself through two books: the Holy Quran and the book of science, so this author is one of those who: believe in the unity of knowledge and who consequently think that theology must take account of all that we know about the world in the course of its inquiry.

We need to share that mystery that many scientists have already grasped: There has grown up a widespread feeling, especially among those who study fundamental physics, that there is more to the world than meets the eye. Science seems to throw up questions which point beyond itself and transcend its power to answer..... It is because we come to know God in His transcendental Majesty and Truth, and know Him to be greater than we can ever conceive or express, that we acknowledge the limitation and relativity of all our forms of thought and speech about Him. Theological knowledge is thus profoundly relative because it is relative to the Absolute.

Theology is not merely a secular subject, though I was indoctrinated to believe so: Worship and prayer is the context in which theology has to be practised; the academic departments of religious studies in our universities are like schools of science unfurnished with laboratories.

Otherwise, all our ideas about God are idolatrous. There are always prophets who challenge ideas that come from our seeking wish-fulfilment.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
0 of 1 people found the following review helpful By The NGs on 4 Dec. 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I bought this book to help my daughter with her Pre U philosophy course. Although I have a reasonable grasp of this subject and the different views I feel JCP has made this very difficult to read. Extensive use of unnecessary big words when simple ones would do. To be fair I am only halfway through but that is because it is a chore to pick it up, this should not be the case.
Read in conjunction with other authors for a balanced view.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 3 reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Part II of Polkinghorne's Science and Theology debate 15 Aug. 2012
By Dr. H. A. Jones - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
This volume, the second of a trilogy, begins where its predecessor, One World, left off - with natural theology. The author was formerly a professor of theoretical physics at Cambridge University but, since 1982, has been an Anglican priest. John Polkinghorne, KBE, FRS, admits quite honestly `I certainly cannot pretend to write as a professional theologian, but only as a scientist deeply interested in the understanding of religion.' As a scientist of considerably lower stature myself but also with an interest and some training in philosophy, to this extent I share a background with the author. The author says that `Theology cannot just be left to the theologians' because too often they ignore totally the findings of science and write as if their scriptures presented truth about the natural world. The remainder of this short book suggests how science can be used to provide evidence for the existence of the God of western religion.

Chapter 2, Insightful Inquiry, suggests how science and theology share the common objective of gaining `a coherent and satisfying understanding of the world in which we live.' Polkinghorne suggests that the anthropic principle, as well as the fortuitous values of the natural constants in the universe pointed out by Paul Davies, form part of the evidence of a beneficent God. Chapter 3 on Order and Disorder expands on this theme. Rather than the meaningless interpretation of Nature given by Jacques Monod's "Chance and Necessity", Polkinghorne says that the potentiality inherent in the properties of matter `is so remarkable as to constitute an insight of design present in the structure of the world.'

Chapter 4 on Creation and Creator takes us back to theology and Genesis. Refreshingly, in Chapter 5 on The Nature of Reality Polkinghorne adopts the stance that his interpretation of the world as a physicist and as a priest must be consistent. So many religious fundamentalists are happy to use their cars and telephones and undergo surgery, trusting in the validity of science and technology, but insist on rejecting scientific criticism of the Genesis story of Creation. Chapter 6 on Theological Science is an excellent discussion of the consistencies and conflicts between science and theology.

This is a good introduction to the science and religion debate. It concludes with several pages of reference Notes, a Bibliography of further reading, and an Index.

Howard Jones is the author of The Thoughtful Guide to God
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
He's better on science than theology 18 Nov. 2013
By Mr. D. P. Jay - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
John Polkinghorne was (and is) a top physicist and he was ordained midlife and served a curacy in this city.

Although he is very orthodox, he isn’t fundamentalist when it comes to creation, seven days and all that.

Just as Islam teaches that Allah reveals himself through two books: the Holy Quran and the book of science, so this author is one of those who: believe in the unity of knowledge and who consequently think that theology must take account of all that we know about the world in the course of its inquiry.

We need to share that mystery that many scientists have already grasped: There has grown up a widespread feeling, especially among those who study fundamental physics, that there is more to the world than meets the eye. Science seems to throw up questions which point beyond itself and transcend its power to answer….. It is because we come to know God in His transcendental Majesty and Truth, and know Him to be greater than we can ever conceive or express, that we acknowledge the limitation and relativity of all our forms of thought and speech about Him. Theological knowledge is thus profoundly relative because it is relative to the Absolute.

Theology is not merely a secular subject, though I was indoctrinated to believe so: Worship and prayer is the context in which theology has to be practised; the academic departments of religious studies in our universities are like schools of science unfurnished with laboratories.

Otherwise, all our ideas about God are idolatrous. There are always prophets who challenge ideas that come from our seeking wish-fulfilment.

He cautions those who look at modern science and say that God is somewhere behind everything – one day scientists will fund whatever it is and that will mean that God is squeezed out: The God of the Gaps is dead and with him has died the old-style natural theology of Paley and the Bridgewater Treatises. No theologian need weep for them, for the God of the Gaps, hovering at the periphery of the known world, was far from being someone of whom it could be said that 'all understand that this is God'. He was proposed as a sort of demiurge, a cause among the other competing causes of the world. When Aquinas spoke of God as 'first cause' he did not consider him thus as a jostling participant among the many efficient causes of the cosmic process. Rather, he is the ground of all that is in the world and not to be identified with any part of its process. He is the author and producer of the play, not a particularly striking actor upon the stage.

He doesn’t accept the multiple universes theory of some: Some have been prompted to speculation that there might be a great variety of universes on offer, so to speak. If that were so …….then we appear in the one we do because it just happened to have the fine tuning permitting us to do so. This notion can be tricked out in various pseudo-scientific ways!' but, since we have the experience of one universe only, we have scientific motivation to speak of that alone and all that goes beyond it is, in the strictest sense, metaphysical. An alternative metaphysical idea of coherence and economy would be that there is just one world which is the way it is because it is the creation of a Creator who wills it to be capable of evolving beings who can come to know him.

Do we see order because we are looking for it and avoid any evidence to the contrary?: but it is your mind, not God's . . . We are understandably liable to see certain characteristics in the objects we perceive because these objects have indeed been shaped by our minds; hence we imagine that the world in and of itself operates according to certain differential equations, that it is built on well-defined quantitative relationships, and is governed by purpose. A natural illusion, but an illusion all the same. It is hard to exaggerate how implausible such a view is. It assumes a strange plasticity in experience which we can mould to our reason-seeking will. The feel of scientific inquiry into the world is entirely different. The phenomena encountered often prove extremely sur¬prising and contrary to our intuition. They resist our attempts to bend them to our prior expectation.

The chance, the dice-playing of God, God’s playfulness, is that makes all sorts of potential possible: When I read Monod's book I was greatly excited by the scientific picture it presented. Instead of seeing chance as an indication of the purposelessness and futility of the world, I was deeply moved by the thought of the astonishing fruitfulness it revealed inherent in the laws of atomic physics...the fact that they have such remarkable consequences as you and me speaks of the amazing potentiality contained in their structure. From this point of view the action of chance is to explore and realise that inherent fruitfulness.

God takes risks, supremely, of course, in the Incarnation – whether or not there was some plan, anything could have happened because humans have free will: We are called by God to share with him in the vulnerability of his act of creation because only by such acceptance can the One who acts by the lure of love rather than by the force of magic accomplish in us and in his whole world his purpose of good.

So there can be miracles, because creation isn’t fixed. There is always the potential for something new.

The author is nowhere more orthodox than in his Christology: An evolutionary view of Jesus as the 'new emergent' in creation fails that test, for what hope could such a figure provide for us who have not emerged? A similar difficulty confronts inspirational views of Christology," which see the special character of Jesus as resulting from his being filled with a unique measure of the divine Spirit, a quantitative rather than a qualitative difference from other prophets and men of God. I personally do not perceive any view of Jesus' person which is capable of coping with these salvia claims about him, which does not seek to wrestle with two difficult and deeply mysterious assertions of orthodox Christian theology: the doctrine of the incarnation (that the hypostatic union of divine and human natures in Christ provides a unique meeting point between God and men through which divine saving power is made available to men - the divine assumption of total humanity to bring about its total redemption); the doctrine of the Body of Christ (which proclaims human solidarity in Christ, so that through that union the life of God is made available to all mankind). Of course, these are counter-intuitive notions which we have the greatest difficulty in grasping. Anyone whose habits of thought have been formed by the practice of science will recognize, if not always welcome, that the complex strangeness of the world can lead us into regimes which in their true nature run counter to the intuitions of everyday life. If science does nothing else it ought to liberate us from an undue tyranny of common sense.
5 of 9 people found the following review helpful
Science and Creation - The Search for Truth 26 Dec. 2007
By Jurassicmark - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Polkinghorne talks about the theological and scientific paradigms by asking some very fundamental questions about how they relate to one another. Some of the questions he poses include what is the relationship between matter and mind, a subject I find extremely fascinating. How are the realms of "becoming" as we experience it and the world of "being" as he believes the way the world of physics describes it relate to God's involvement and the physical universe. How do the supposed insights of what he believes modern physics and the intertwining of order and disorder relate to the Christian doctrine of creation? These are some of the questions he asks and attempts to answer in this book. Notes at the end of the book, a bibliography and a subject index are most helpful.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback