Back in the 1970s, I bought Kempff's Schumann discs as they came out on LP. At that time the music was new to me, and I found Kempff's playing opened up a whole new world. Since then, much water has flowed under the bridge. But I still return to these classic performances with the greatest pleasure.
Kempff's view of Schumann is very balanced and centred, but (alas) some mistakenly think it's boring and lacking in passion and poetic insight. Even back in the '70s there were dissenting voices - those who felt his performances were not extrovert enough; the passion of youth viewed through the dulled prism of age and experience, so-to-speak. While it's true that Kempff's Schumann is less wild and crazy than many, he understands the inner message of the music like few others.
Kempff's greatest gift as an interpreter is his ability to render Schumann's (potentially) episodic flights of fantasy so that they register in a wholly coherent manner. With him, the music's inner narrative unfolds with a cohesive integrity that probably only Richter can equal. When I first heard these Kempff recordings 30 plus years ago, this aspect was not immediately obvious. Having few other performances to compare, I took this cohesiveness for granted.
Then, some years later, I recall trying to find an acceptable performance of Davidsbundlertanze on CD (Kempff's recordings having yet to be issued), and being shocked and dismayed by how 'fractured' and lacking in cohesion they all sounded. Davidsbundlertanze is perhaps the most difficult of Schumann's piano works to bring off convincingly. Yet Kempff effortlessly pulls each disparate strand together, and makes the music sound as though cut from a single piece of cloth.
The same is true of the Humoreske - and Kreisleriana. The latter is mercilessly mauled by most pianists in a vain attempt to squeeze out every drop of emotion, and in the process the structure of the work all but falls apart. Not Kempff; he holds everything together by not giving way to surface exaggeration and superficial point-making. The ghostly final pages are wonderfully atmospheric and evocative.
In this respect Kempff still has no equal, and that's why he remains my first choice for Schumann! Those who see Schumann's music (especially the works for piano) as something of a rollercoaster experience may find Kempff's performances lacking in thrills and spills. But, Schumann is more than a whiteknuckle ride. In Kempff, you have an interpreter who understands the inner Schumann; one who knows the way. So listen without prejudice and let him guide you!
J M Hughes