Buy Used
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Expedited shipping available on this book. The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged.
Trade in your item
Get a £0.34
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Sanctuary (New Doctor Who Adventures) Paperback – 20 Apr 1995

See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
£8.99 £1.53

Trade In this Item for up to £0.34
Trade in Sanctuary (New Doctor Who Adventures) for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £0.34, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

  • Paperback: 272 pages
  • Publisher: Dr Who (20 April 1995)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0426204395
  • ISBN-13: 978-0426204398
  • Product Dimensions: 1.9 x 11.4 x 17.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 3.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 339,989 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description


The TARDIS is caught in the gravitational field of a dark star. The Doctor and Bernice are forced to evacuate, and find themselves stranded in medieval France - a time of crusades and war. They both realize that to leave history unchanged they may have to sacrifice far more than their lives.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
As a Doctor Who novel this offering by David Macintee is a bit of a curveball. It actually reads as a straightforward 'sword and sandals epic' rather than a Sci-fi story. This is not a bad thing in itself - after all the original concept of 'Doctor Who' lent itself to the TARDIS going back into Earth's past and involving the crew in shaping the planet's destiny. Unfortunately 'Sanctuary' is no 'Reign of Terror'; it's not even a 'Gunfighters'. Full marks for originality and presentation (great artwork usually leaves The Doctor out!); but that's as good as it gets.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 1 review
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Zzzzzzzzzzzanctuary 1 Jun. 2003
By Andrew McCaffrey - Published on
Format: Paperback
SANCTUARY did one thing very right. But it drowned that one shining beacon of quality in a plethora of things that were off, or dull, or just unnecessary. I found reading this to be a very frustrating experience. On the surface, it has a lot going for it. It's a pure historical, which hadn't been seen for a long time. It features just the Doctor and Benny, a combination that wasn't used as often as it should have been. The setting (medieval France with the Crusades as a backdrop) is intriguing. However, virtually nothing is executed well. The sole exceptions are the secondary character of Guy de Carnac and his relationship with Benny.
The story opens with a pointless and endless sequence of the Doctor and Benny surviving some technobabble invader, which eventually deposits them in the main portion of the plot. If this section had been removed, nothing at all would have been lost. I never really understood the lengths that some authors will go through to insert the Doctor and companion team into the story. CAVES OF ANDROZANI aired here recently, and the difference between that opening and SANCTUARY's couldn't have been more pronounced. Robert Holmes doesn't bother with long explanations about why the Doctor happened to land on Androzani Minor; he just launches into the story at full-speed. SANCTUARY would have been greatly helped had the introduction explanations been completely removed. The only reason they seem to exist here is for the author to indulge in numerous and inane continuity references. The book is virtually at a standstill until McIntee gets all of this out of his system.
The main problem that I had with SANCTUARY is that is was deathly boring. There was a one hundred, fifty-page section in the middle that I simply had to force myself to get through. The single interesting thing going on was the nicely understated relationship developing between Benny and Guy de Carnac. I looked forward to these sections to pull me through the tedium that was the rest of the story. I just couldn't make myself care about any part of the main plot. The Doctor's subplot is dull. The whodunit is dull. The Inquisition-era politics is dull. The fight scenes go on for far too long, and they're dull. The base-under-siege mentality is unoriginal, and dull. I simply couldn't get excited about any of these parts of the story. If I ever decide to reread this one, I think I'll restrict myself to only reading the Guy portions, and to completely skip the rest.
Despite not liking most of SANCTUARY, if McIntee's Guy trilogy of books ever materializes, I'd be interested in reading them. Guy de Carnac is not only one of the few good things about this novel, but he is a genuinely intriguing character in his own right. His reactions to his surroundings, his attitude, his point of view and his back-story are all quite strong. He does fall into cliché at times, but is a solid enough character in other ways to rise above that. One of the best moments in the story comes as a dream/flashback sequence in the later half, featuring an examination of Guy's background. It's a shocking moment, and one that shines as a giant diamond in a sea of turgid writing.
As well as being a great cure for insomnia, the book does itself no favors on the prose-front either. When it's not purple, it's workmanlike. When it's not workmanlike, it's awkward. When it's not awkward, it's incomprehensible. The aforementioned dream sequence is the only point in the book when the actual writing itself doesn't interfere with the story being told.
And, yet, I feel that buried in here somewhere was a really good story. If the numerous fight scenes had been harshly trimmed back, if the lethargic opening scenes were cut entirely, if some of the secondary characters had been written as people rather than as instruments to further the plot, if the editor had been a little more liberal with the red ink. If all these things had been done, I think we'd be looking at a really good story. Of course, it would only be about half as long and would probably need to be printed in a gigantic font to boost the page-count, but we can't have everything, can we?
Was this review helpful? Let us know