Start reading STIEG LARSSON Man, Myth & Mistress on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

 
 
 

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Read books on your computer or other mobile devices with our FREE Kindle Reading Apps.
STIEG LARSSON Man, Myth & Mistress
 
 

STIEG LARSSON Man, Myth & Mistress [Kindle Edition]

André Jute , Andrew McCoy
3.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (11 customer reviews)

Digital List Price: £1.92 What's this?
Print List Price: £10.20
Kindle Price: £1.92 includes VAT* & free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: £8.28 (81%)
Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £1.92  
Paperback £10.18  


Product Description

Product Description

Stieg Larsson
Man, Myth & Mistress
who created the Millennium Trilogy of
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
The Girl Who Played with Fire
The Girl Who Kicked the Hornets’ Nest

Is Lisbeth Salander a feminist — or a comic book avenger? Is her creator Stieg Larsson a feminist — or a prurient, violent hack? What is the Millennium Trilogy really about? Is it literature or vicarious violence and sex? Should Eva Gabrielsson be in charge of the Girl franchise? Should there be a second Salander Trilogy? Who built the Stieg Larsson myth, and is any of it true?

Best selling authors André Jute and Andrew McCoy wittily investigate the evidence — and arrive at the correct politically incorrect answers. They fix the blame for the Larsson scandal on… surprising people. Some Millennium fans will riot, most will be riotously entertained.

‘Jute is great…a private godsend.’
Ruth Rendell, The Times

The apartheid regime in South Africa twice sent assassins after Andrew McCoy, claiming his novel The Insurrectionist was a ‘blueprint for black revolution’ and a ‘handbook for the ANC’.

Like Larsson, André Jute has been a journalist and graphic designer. His novel Reverse Negative led to the exposure of the spy in the Queen’s household, Anthony Blunt. He is an acclaimed expert on the thriller, his Writing a Thriller going into three ever-expanding editions over 25 years.

Product details


More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
A Provocative Critique 23 April 2011
Format:Kindle Edition
Many thanks to André Jute for sending me a review copy of his (and Andrew McCoy's) critique/treatise on the Millennium Trilogy. I found it interesting, absorbing and thought provoking. Undoubtedly there are many like me who raced through the three books, enjoying the action and intending to come back and read the books more thoroughly later. This is because there are long dense passages outlining the political history of modern day Sweden which, while relevant, seem clumsily to interrupt the progress of the story. This is probably part of the reason for Jute and McCoy's critique of the structure of the novels.

This was my first impression of the books, but Jute's detailed exploration of the texts makes one realise there are certain inconsistencies and lacunas in the text. Jute brings out Larsson's self proclaimed feminism, or perhaps his partner's feminism as Larsson died before the books were published and therefore the majority of his supposed views come from his partner and colleagues. Is Salander consciously feminist or is she justifiably `getting even' against those people who harm her. Mind you, I don't necessarily think a woman can be definitively labelled as `not a feminist' just because she gets some fake breasts when she has the means. She might just wish not to be physically infantile any longer. Feminism (in my view) is the right of equality both in the home and the work place but does not mean one has to be deliberately unattractive! Some might say that Larsson's description of the rape is prurient and makes the reader feels like a voyeur. If this aids the cause of feminism I would be surprised.

I'm not sure if I quite agree with the author's analysis of Salander's preparedness to swap sex for goods - the `top of the range`laptop. In the story she is quite a stranger to almost any human warmth, having been abused by virtually everyone she has come in contact with, individuals and the State. Sex for her was probably considered a commodity, but the horrible violence shown to her on her second visit to her legal guardian was not `part of the deal' and her revenge is applauded by most readers, I should imagine. Incidentally, Jute touches on Larsson's suggestion that Salander has Asperger's Syndrome (which does sometimes go with high intelligence) and that had occurred to me, but her alienation is more likely

The fact that we (and André Jute) are drawn to analyze the characters Salander and Blomquist almost as if they were real is a tribute to Larsson, despite the under edited form of the books. I agree Blomquist, although leading the structure of the plot in the first novel is a shadowy reactive character and Salander is definitely the protagonist. But there is much more to think on in Andre Jute's book and it is well worth reading. I shall certainly read the trilogy again with a more critical eye and even if they do not last as `literature' I can see the books being analyzed in Popular Culture courses in the future. I have also seen all three Swedish films and the first in particular is so much tighter; it seems the film makers did a better job of editing than the publishers - although Jute makes it clear the constraints they were under, both from Eva Gabrielsson and the publishers who traditionally do not like to over edit the work of a dead author.

Penultimate thought: I loved the lists and the shopping - but there you go

Finally - thank you André Jute for explaining what `Kalle Blomquist' means! I have searched dictionaries and the internet to try and find out. Swedes would know immediately and a footnote in the book for other nationalities would have been welcome!
Was this review helpful to you?
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Pretty vicious stuff 11 Aug 2011
By Nick
Format:Kindle Edition|Amazon Verified Purchase
I thought this quite an interesting read but I was surprised by the tone of it - pretty vicious. It's a real hatchet job on Larsson and those around him. The authors keep stressing it's a literary review, but a lot of the vitriol is aimed at the claims Larsson made about his past, and how the publishers - and his girlfriend - exploited that, and what's happened since the books achieved such runaway successs ... so that's hardly keeping to the text. The language used by the authors is often playground, rather than civil debate. I found it very tabloid in tone.

If I'd paid good money for a hardback version I'd be complaining. As it is, £2.50 for the Kindle version didn't seem too bad for the chance to have a different view of the Larsson phenomenon, and they certainly provide that.
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Format:Kindle Edition
THE LARSSON SCANDAL

Recently, a trusted friend described the Larsson Trilogy as "books you just can't put down." With such a final recommendation, and having resisted until then, how could I resist any longer? At a loose end recently on a forced, family-related vacation in a very bleak cold climate, the trilogy provided an ideal escape from climatic challenge and familial torture.

In the advance-copy printed version "The Larsson Scandal - The Insider's Riotously Politically Incorrect Unauthorized Guerilla Critique of Stieg Larsson", kindly provided by Gemma at CoolMain Press, André Jute and Andrew McCoy have taken on the task of getting into the blood and bones of the books and of the Larsson juggernaut phenomenon which has elevated him to semi-sainthood and rising. They do a good job generally. Some have accused them of sour grapes and professional jealousy, in the face of the runaway success of the Trilogy. I doubt this. Like many others, they merely wondered what the fuss is all about; smelled a few dead rats, and sought to provide answers to some pertinent questions, for those unable or not interested to seek them out themselves. Let's face it; the entire Larsson story is a saga novel in itself!

They also point out a most fortunate and fortuitous conjunction: apart from the efforts of Larsson's print publishers in Sweden, the UK and the USA, the arrival of the e-book phenomenon spawned massive sales and other e-methods like blogs, added to the effect. It was in fact, a "created" fame with a huge add-on effect and benefits. Enter Amazon with great effect. Remember Dan Brown and his spawning capacity? This is far bigger!

Jute and McCoy write informally and at times, rather too loosely, but, despite the occasional word likely to send most racing for the dictionary - irredentist; decalogue; berserker; happenstances - mount a good argument and provide selected and pertinent examples in support of their contentions. As they also point out, yet more examples would have resulted in a mega tome, thereby over-labouring a point. There is much analysis and comment about the feminist perspective and, linked with this, Stieg's feminism and its source. I needed to be more informed on that but admit I have a long way to go before I'd be considered a feminist.

Back to the source, the Trilogy: a book can of course be a "good read" without overt critical analysis, but in my case, while I consider all three overall a "good read", early in the piece, the critical parts of my brain also started asking questions and saying... "Hang on a minute!" There were inconsistencies; there were great chunks of boring, pointless diversion and unnecessary detail, merely confusing and getting in the way of progress of the plot; and there were unlikely events and implausible scenarios, which at first, started to affect my overall perceptions and then to irritate me with increasing intensity. Added to this, Larsson's writing - neither fluent nor generally memorable - all collectively stimulated my critical faculties but still allowed at the end, a general assessment as a "pretty good read", in other words, a pass mark. Jute and McCoy share these perceptions.

Reading beyond the three books, there also appeared to be considerable intrigue about the life and death of the author himself and in this regard, I then started to wonder about the mix of reality, fact, myth and fiction. Another aspect of great interest is the entire modus operandi of the publishing trade. It is - it seems - a brutal world whose values are a bit murky. Jute and McCoy also turn their focus here.

Now, there are two key questions and then, many follow-on questions when one considers the "Larsson phenomenon". The first is, "Who was the real Stieg Larsson? And the second, "How much is his persona a creation of his own fictions and mythmaking and the gilding, fictions, diversions and mythmaking of others?" His writing really is a product of this complex mix of reality and fantasy. After the books, Larsson himself and the cavalcade around him is an infinitely more interesting saga of Norse proportions. Jute and McCoy certainly add to this notion.

Although a dead author is generally a liability, Larsson died at an opportune time for some, notably his brother Joakim and father, Erland, and then it must be said for his image and the commercial success of his publishers, who were it seems, surprised that they had an unexpected blockbuster on their hands. Conversely, Larsson died at an inconvenient time for others, notably long-term lover (common-law wife) Eva Gabrielsson. It is Gabrielsson, most curiously, who is still in possession of Larsson's laptop where allegedly, the fourth novel in the series lies in vestigial form as well as other outlines. In fact, far from expressing sympathy to Eva's plight, Jute and McCoy give Gabrielsson quite a serve and this contrasts markedly with the viewpoints of others who consider her a seriously wronged woman and a victim of primitive Swedish law. There is even a support Eva fund.

In Larsson's eyes, Sweden certainly is no dull, brooding backwater. If one is to believe the insinuations, Sweden as a presumed democratic paradise of free love and choice, has many deep and dark rivers running through it, including, in recent years, political assassinations. For Larsson, it is a place of conspiracy, murder, machination and mayhem. We have to be thankful for the goodies.

Jute and McCoy point out, extremely stridently at times, the often poor quality and sloppiness of Larsson's writing in totality with its awkward constructions, convoluted sub-plots which digress from the key direction, and meaningless diversions, which often end up confusing the characters and direction. Much of it indeed does not ring true and at times the authors wonder if it is Larsson having a private joke at the expense of us all. Such conjecture certainly fits with the Larsson we think we now might just know.

But, I hear you say: it's fiction: does it all need to hang true? Well, yes. Within the genre in which Larsson writes, good fiction should reflect reality and at the very least, the realms of the possible. Right on boys and girls!

There is another point worthy of mention: with Larsson, what is really on trial is the whole Swedish state, it system and structures; and here, the books do get rather mixed up with reality. Often touted as a model democracy and welfare state, the fact is that Eva Gabrielsson, regardless of any posturing or myth-building of her own, can be disinherited after 32 years because there was neither a valid marriage - according to the Swedish state at least - nor a valid will. Brother Joakim apparently had urged his brother to marry but regardless, he and his father now preside over the spoils of his brother's failure to marry properly, in accordance with primitive Swedish law, and allied failure to leave a valid will. Ouch! Gabrielsson, however, remains a thorn in their collective sides and an angry woman.

And then there's the violence, which Jute and McCoy also consider although they do have questions about Larsson's quoted "statistics". I don't think the violence - as appalling as it is - is gratuitous: Lisbeth Salander has been subjected to physical and emotional violence all her life, by the state and its instrumentalities, structures and systems; and by her father. She has been dispossessed, denied and discarded because the state placed her obnoxious father on a higher level of importance. She has good reason to be a bit miffed with it all. I see Lisbeth as a symbol of resistance and survival, even if I didn't exactly fall in love with her. She is a victim of the state, through its agencies and agents, on a frolic of their own, who have chosen to play dirty and nasty, and most conveniently out of sight and off the official record. And, all clearly is not well in the kingdom of Sweden! Much in Swedish society gets hidden away and ignored and while this might not apply to Sweden alone, it is also interesting, in the light of all of this, to consider what the Swedish state, in collusion with others, has done or tried to do, to Julian Assange of Wikileaks infamy. Political assassinations in Sweden and the "reasons" for them also make an interesting topic for analysis.

Oh, and what of the characters, upon whom Jute and McCoy also pass judgment? Of course, Larsson's characters are all flawed in some way and often display twists and turns which merely confuse and frustrate with their bloody-mindedness. They certainly can test one's patience and sympathies, and one is challenged to like any of them. But then, this is perhaps reflective of Larsson himself. Another private joke?

Unless you want to go on a critical crusade of your own, read this book for a bit of useful Larsson enlightenment; a denouement of the plot. It's not perfect but it hits the mark!
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Envious or politically motivated hatchet job
What a disappointment. This seems to be written by people who either for political reasons want to smear a dead man or are so envious they have not manged to write a world wide... Read more
Published 3 months ago by nick goss
Angry
I'm now about 60% of the way through this book and I have wanted to scrap it more than once. I find it very repetitive in its criticism and the comments about feminism leave me... Read more
Published 4 months ago by Annieblue
Poor, utter rubbish
Poorly researched, badly constructed 'review' - the aim is to cash in on the subject's success, by trying (and failing) to undermine that legacy. Read more
Published 7 months ago by Michael L
Good but flawed
I bought this Kindle book almost as soon as I'd finished The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest. I wanted a critique of Larsson's trilogy, and I suppose I can't have any complaints... Read more
Published 11 months ago by Truman
Excellent guide to how publishing does and doesn't work
My first encounter with Andre Jute's work was way back in the 1980s when I was working my way towards writing my first novel, when I read his excellent Writing a Thriller (Writing... Read more
Published 13 months ago by Keith Brooke
......part Four .
When i finished the `Tattoo` trilogy i was surprised at how much i had enjoyed it despite my being aware throughout just how much of it was quite hard work to get through. Read more
Published 16 months ago by willie wit
Minority Report
"Any man more right than his neighbors is a majority of one."

Who said that?

Well, it doesn't really matter, you get the point. Read more
Published 17 months ago by William Marantz
Fasten your seatbelts, we're in for a bumpy ride
I'll declare my interests. I received a free review copy of this book from the author Jute through the kindle Discussions boards. Would I shell out actual hard-earned to read this? Read more
Published 17 months ago by Alina
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Popular Highlights

 (What's this?)
&quote;
an intellectual should count his enemies with pride as the measure of his righteousness, and if he finds none backtrack to when he sold out. &quote;
Highlighted by 4 Kindle users
&quote;
Grisham doesnt have something else that great writers whose books survive to become literature must have: he doesnt touch some important universal human experience. &quote;
Highlighted by 4 Kindle users
&quote;
Then the blogs, particularly powerful in America, joined in. &quote;
Highlighted by 3 Kindle users

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Amazon Media EU S.à r.l. GB Privacy Statement Amazon Media EU S.à r.l. GB Delivery Information Amazon Media EU S.à r.l. GB Returns & Exchanges