The central idea of this book is an intriguing one in an age when so many people are ready to proclaim glib certainties about Jesus' intentions. The Kingdom of God, the author argues, was and should continue to be established by indirection and by a subtle, suggestive 'pointing beyond' what is to what might be. McLaren is at pains to show how this approach is in continuity with the style of Jewish prophetic tradition, but also grows out of the social and political context of Jesus' day, when Roman occupation of his homeland was a major factor shaping thought and circumscribing the possibilities for political and social change. Though the book's central idea is a little difficult to sustain for over 200 pages (and there's an element of repetition in the middle section), there's much to ponder here.
If the Kingdom is as McLaren suggests it is, then new metaphors are necessary to describe it - I liked the metaphor of it being God's network. What emerges is a fairly radical new vision of what the followers of Jesus need to be working at in order to bring that Kingdom in. It will perhaps strike you as less radical if you're familiar with the work of activists like Jim Wallis, but I suspect McLaren's vision is aimed fairly squarely at more conservative strands of Christianity in his native America. One point that really jarred, though: McLaren sees the `peaceable Kingdom' as one of Jesus' goals, and that's a vision that involves harmony with the natural world. So far so good. But he quotes as evidence for that emerging vision another author's description of a choreographed show of captive orcas at a Seaworld Centre in Florida. How wild mammals, reduced to performing for human amusement in the confines of a pool, can embody the peaceable Kingdom eludes me. This (serious) critique apart, though, a recommended read.