The sequel to 'man of honour'....it had the promise to be a better book and the series does have a great future as there's something glorious about this period of history.
Yet why does it fail? According to the amazon reviewer Alejo ADB, giving it 2 stars is a too low. Well i give it one, because thats my opinion.
Well because although the tale of battle and siege are the sort to be a page turner of most military readers, Iain Gale, can not write it well. On the book's cover it says "if you like Sharpe, Jack Steel is your man". A clever ploy used by the publishers to get sharpe fans to buy it, but Mr Gale is no Bernard Cornwell.
Richard Sharpe stories are (not without fault), but on the whole a cracking read. Jack Steel books are not. Jack Steel is a boring character, and I thought by the second outing we may have had the character flushed out, but no we don't. I would recommend Mr Gale not trying to write a Sharpe story and concentrate on making Jack Steel and his annoying Harper-esque Sergeant original.
Anyway, The book opens with the battle of Ramillies 1706, 2 years after Blenhiem when something more interesting happened. Steel survives...and is sent on a sort of dangerous mission which involves, conspirators, frenchmen, an enemy or two and in the setting of the great citadel of Ostend.
If you liked the first book, you'll like this one...the third book Brothers in Arms is apparently out, so give it a read if youre a fan. But Mr Gale - please give more ooomph. Thank you.