Amazon.co.uk allows you to pay for your items in your local currency. Restrictions apply. Learn More. |
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
Listen to Samples and Buy MP3s
Songs from this album are available to purchase as MP3s. Click on "Buy MP3" or
view the MP3 Album.
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
2 reviews
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Roussel's four fine symphonies -- a real find
22 Feb 2010
Format:Audio CD|Amazon Verified Purchase
I only recently discovered these early 20th century symphonies when I learned that Martinu, the great Czech composer, had studied with Roussel (1869-1937). These are fine little-known works, written between 1904 and 1934. Charles Dutoit leads the Orchestre de France in excellent performances recorded in 1985. (This new Apex release is a reissue of the 1999 Erato set.) I think this set has the edge over the now out-of-print RCA recording led by Janowski, recorded a few years later in 1993/4. The Janowski cycle excels in the slow, quiet movements, but Dutoit is better in the more boisterous passages.
Symphony No. 1 (Le Poeme de la foret) is a lovely Impressionist piece in four movements of 35 minutes length, clearly influenced by Debussy as well as Roussel's teacher Vincent d'Indy. A portrait of the forest's moods through winter, spring, summer and fall, it utilizes classical forms -- sonata form for the second movement, a ternary adagio for the third movement, and a rondo finale. Symphony No. 2 was written in 1919 and is darker in tone, reflecting Roussel's wartime experience. Roussel served voluntarily, despite his age. I find this to be a most impressive work, but it was not a success and is rarely heard. In three movements of 37 minutes duration, it is the longest, most complex and difficult of Roussel's symphonies. It was considered too gloomy and austere by a public eager to move on from the Great War, but I think it is revealed today to be at least the equal of Roussel's Fourth, and I would argue closer in quality to his symphonic masterpiece, the Third.
Symphony No. 3 was commissioned for the 50th anniversary of the Boston Philharmonic Orchestra by its legendary conductor Serge Koussevitzky, and he led its triumphant premiere in Boston on October 24th, 1930. It is a tremendously vivacious piece, leading off with a five-note motif in a distinctive dance/march rhythm that seems to have been in Martinu's head when he composed his similarly energetic 4th Symphony in 1945. The Third Symphony moves irresistably across four movements of 24 minutes length. Surely Roussel's best known work, it is more than deserving of its popularity. Its reception bolstered Roussel, who wrote one more symphony a few years later in 1934. Symphony No. 4 was written easily and quickly in only five months from August to December. Another four-movement work, it is is 21 minutes long, and similar to the Third in its classical and impressively balanced form.
If you really fall for Roussel's symphonies you may want to hear the new cycle from Eschenbach on Ondine leading the Orchestre de Paris -- Symphony 1 "Le Poème de la forêt" and Symphony 4, Symphony 3 and "Le Festin de l'araignée" and Symphony 2 and "Bacchus et Ariane". Eschenbach considers Roussel's Second to be a 20th century masterpiece.
Symphony No. 1 (Le Poeme de la foret) is a lovely Impressionist piece in four movements of 35 minutes length, clearly influenced by Debussy as well as Roussel's teacher Vincent d'Indy. A portrait of the forest's moods through winter, spring, summer and fall, it utilizes classical forms -- sonata form for the second movement, a ternary adagio for the third movement, and a rondo finale. Symphony No. 2 was written in 1919 and is darker in tone, reflecting Roussel's wartime experience. Roussel served voluntarily, despite his age. I find this to be a most impressive work, but it was not a success and is rarely heard. In three movements of 37 minutes duration, it is the longest, most complex and difficult of Roussel's symphonies. It was considered too gloomy and austere by a public eager to move on from the Great War, but I think it is revealed today to be at least the equal of Roussel's Fourth, and I would argue closer in quality to his symphonic masterpiece, the Third.
Symphony No. 3 was commissioned for the 50th anniversary of the Boston Philharmonic Orchestra by its legendary conductor Serge Koussevitzky, and he led its triumphant premiere in Boston on October 24th, 1930. It is a tremendously vivacious piece, leading off with a five-note motif in a distinctive dance/march rhythm that seems to have been in Martinu's head when he composed his similarly energetic 4th Symphony in 1945. The Third Symphony moves irresistably across four movements of 24 minutes length. Surely Roussel's best known work, it is more than deserving of its popularity. Its reception bolstered Roussel, who wrote one more symphony a few years later in 1934. Symphony No. 4 was written easily and quickly in only five months from August to December. Another four-movement work, it is is 21 minutes long, and similar to the Third in its classical and impressively balanced form.
If you really fall for Roussel's symphonies you may want to hear the new cycle from Eschenbach on Ondine leading the Orchestre de Paris -- Symphony 1 "Le Poème de la forêt" and Symphony 4, Symphony 3 and "Le Festin de l'araignée" and Symphony 2 and "Bacchus et Ariane". Eschenbach considers Roussel's Second to be a 20th century masterpiece.
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful
Roussel by Dutoit
20 Sep 2009
Format:Audio CD|Amazon Verified Purchase
Very nice to know the complete Roussel symphonies. I
think the Nrs. 1 and 2 are much better than more famous
Nr.3. Dutoit conducts with real conviction and deliver
a splendid symphonic cycle. This is the cycle to get.
think the Nrs. 1 and 2 are much better than more famous
Nr.3. Dutoit conducts with real conviction and deliver
a splendid symphonic cycle. This is the cycle to get.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Listmania!
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
