What have Those Who Make The Decisions got against Star Trek: Enterprise? As a general fan of all things Trek I, like many others I suspect, felt that the TV series, having started off rather slowly, was just building up nicely to its obvious climax, namely the war with The Romulans and the subsequent founding of The Federation. Then the TV execs pulled the plug resulting in the deeply unsatisfactory mess that were the last episodes, leaving us thinking "Was that it?"
So I was heartened when the subsequent novels came out and once we got past the need to somehow reincarnate one of the central characters, the storyline picked itself up again, existing characters were re-fleshed out and new ones introduced. The Trek universe of the early 22nd century was enlarged and I looked forward to an on-going series of novels providing much more detail about the various "historical" facts that we already knew about. To be fair to Michael Martin, I realise that unlike pretty much every other Trek storyline (Titan, Typhon Pact, "New" Voyager etc..) which are open ended both in timescale and scope, Enterprise has a clearly defined end point which must be a bit restricting from the writers perspective. A good author should be able to adapt their narrative however and still provide exciting, believable stories about a period of Trek history that has a fundamental impact on all that came after it. Regrettably this is not the case with this novel.
Overall the impression left is of a hasty hotch-potch of a story, far below the standard of the other Enterprise novels and Mr Martin's other works in the Trek genre. There are just too many loose ends to tie up, too many characters whose individual stories warranted a fuller treatment and too many leaps in circumstance from the previous novel Beneath the Raptor's Wing that are barely explained. Assuming for a moment that you agree with the decision to bring this storyline to a close (which I lament) at the very least it seems to me that the whole Romulan War storyline should have warranted a trilogy by itself (rather like the climactic conflict with The Borg in the Destiny trilogy) with then perhaps a final story describing the birth of the United Federation of Planets. This would have given the author space to bring all the stories and characters together in a much more satisfactory manner. As it is, apart from Archer, T'Pol and Trip who feature throughout (and even they are moved around in a rather disjointed manner) some of the supporting characters barely warrant a scant paragraph in this novel, despite having played quite substantial roles in either the TV series, the previous stories, or even both!
Why buy this book? Like other reviewers have said, I suppose to get some sort of closure, however unsatisfactory. There is a lack of detail in some areas that really irritates and the need to cover a timescale of around thirty years means there are jumps in the narrative that leave you thinking "hold on- did I miss a page there?" I don't know if the decision to end it was made by Michael Martin, or by some other anonymous third party- if the former then sorry, it's a poor effort. If the latter you can have some sympathy Mr Martin- asking any author to wrap the previous multiple storylines up in one book is just unrealistic and I doubt anyone could have done much better. Some people have said that Enterprise was always the poor relation by comparison to the other TV series (I'm not sure I entirely agree with that either), but I feel the previous novels held their own and the storyline did not deserve to be axed in quite such a brutal manner, for a second time. Like I said before... History repeating itself.