- Unknown Binding
- Publisher: Encounter Books (2005)
- ASIN: B006LT8XHG
- Average Customer Review: 3.2 out of 5 stars See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
- See Complete Table of Contents
Romancing Opiates
and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle .
Learn more
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
32 of 34 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Dalrymple's essay on the myths and deliberate lies surrounding heroin addiction is enjoyable, in parts amusing and largely accurate.
Heroin, as he suggests is a piece of cake to withdraw from, especially when compared to alcohol withdrawal. The very worst one might expect are symptoms similar to those of a nasty cold, perhaps with a bit of diarrhea thrown in. Alcoholics however, might have to contend with hallucinations, convultions and death. As a rule of thumb, no-one ever dies coming off heroin, plenty die coming off alcohol. However, it is in no-ones interest, not least the addict or the ubiquitous D & A worker to blow the gaff. Dalrymple explains why.
He also, interestingly, devotes time to methadone use as a pharmacological substitute for opiates. Has methadone killed more addicts than heroin? Perhaps it has.
I also enjoyed the examination of De Quincy and Coleridge, and their self serving descriptions of opiate use and addiction and its subsequent transference to popular culture. He thesis seems probable and is certainly intering.
However, towards the end of the book, Dalrymple seems to run out of steam. His call to shut all treatment agencies may of course be based on countless interactions with staple-faced, DM wearing, holier-than-thou 'workers', who it seems to me, after 10 years working with alcoholics, are attracted to the counter culture aspects of the work rather than anything else. And, I can understand how jaded he mnight be working with those people who, at best are a conduit for the addict (to get drugs) and are at worst actively harmful, in their idealogical "client driven" way,to their clients, their families and society at large.
But - Dalrymple either does not know of, or has not bothered to do research into agencies that do tell the addict exactly how it is. They may be few and far between, but assuredly, they do exist.
Heroin, as he suggests is a piece of cake to withdraw from, especially when compared to alcohol withdrawal. The very worst one might expect are symptoms similar to those of a nasty cold, perhaps with a bit of diarrhea thrown in. Alcoholics however, might have to contend with hallucinations, convultions and death. As a rule of thumb, no-one ever dies coming off heroin, plenty die coming off alcohol. However, it is in no-ones interest, not least the addict or the ubiquitous D & A worker to blow the gaff. Dalrymple explains why.
He also, interestingly, devotes time to methadone use as a pharmacological substitute for opiates. Has methadone killed more addicts than heroin? Perhaps it has.
I also enjoyed the examination of De Quincy and Coleridge, and their self serving descriptions of opiate use and addiction and its subsequent transference to popular culture. He thesis seems probable and is certainly intering.
However, towards the end of the book, Dalrymple seems to run out of steam. His call to shut all treatment agencies may of course be based on countless interactions with staple-faced, DM wearing, holier-than-thou 'workers', who it seems to me, after 10 years working with alcoholics, are attracted to the counter culture aspects of the work rather than anything else. And, I can understand how jaded he mnight be working with those people who, at best are a conduit for the addict (to get drugs) and are at worst actively harmful, in their idealogical "client driven" way,to their clients, their families and society at large.
But - Dalrymple either does not know of, or has not bothered to do research into agencies that do tell the addict exactly how it is. They may be few and far between, but assuredly, they do exist.
Format:Hardcover
Dalrymple writes from extensive experience, on a subject about which there is far more propaganda than true scientific discussion. Writing as a medical student, I wholeheartedly agree with his sentiments about the over-empathasisation of this area from the medical profession. This is a fantastic book, presenting a well-argued and eloquent case against the 'standard view' of addiction.
Format:Hardcover|Amazon Verified Purchase
Perhaps the most interesting revelation in this book is that William Wilberforce, who led the revolt against the slave trade, was an opium addict. Got the job done, but he was an opium addict. One can only respond, so what? The trouble is that the writer has, by his own choice, overexposed himself to the world of addicts. He can no longer see that human beings have intrinsic worth, no matter what their behaviour. The whole book is a discussion of how frustrated he is with the world, with addicts, with his life as a doctor, and how the lies of the therapeutic community make everything worse. He even takes many pages to blame literature for glamorising drug use.
He looks at the real motive for taking drugs - life is crap. We're in an existential crisis and there is no answer. But is this assumption, the assumption that underlies the entire book, true? Where is the evidence? Wouldn't it be more true to say that the people who become heroin addicts have been born into absolutely hideous circumstances, have never been loved by anyone, and that love is what they really need? This writer doesn't love anyone or anything. His hatred for and judgement of humanity boils on every page. And that's his choice. I am so glad this is not my doctor.
He looks at the real motive for taking drugs - life is crap. We're in an existential crisis and there is no answer. But is this assumption, the assumption that underlies the entire book, true? Where is the evidence? Wouldn't it be more true to say that the people who become heroin addicts have been born into absolutely hideous circumstances, have never been loved by anyone, and that love is what they really need? This writer doesn't love anyone or anything. His hatred for and judgement of humanity boils on every page. And that's his choice. I am so glad this is not my doctor.
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
