| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Maybe the heroine is a bit wild and difficult to get on with and it was her fault that she miscarried though if the horse hadn't bolted, her unborn baby would have survived and he didn't seem to care whether or not he nearly lost her so I think accusing him of treating her like a brood mare is justified there.
Of course during the 19th century, indeed until a few years ago, rape within marriage was not a criminal offence. But even then, I feel a decent man would never rape his wife, or any woman - whatever the law says...
However, in some ways I enjoyed the book because of her rebellious nature, but I found elements of the book rather offensive. I'm not saying that when writing novels we should pretend that people during the 19th century behaved as though they are in the 21st but I believe even during the 19th century, no decent man would behave like Ben Maddox towards his wife, whether or not that this was intentional on the author's part to project the 'hero' in a positive light. Such a partner is, in my opinion, abusive, be it the present day, the 19th century, or the Stone Age. He is described in the book as a "modern" man. Not if he tries to domineer her, then beats and rapes her to force her to do what he wants (or if he doesn't get his own way), in my opinion. Even if he does discuss intelligent subjects such as politics with her.
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|